Anarkink Post-Bookfair Play Party

2009-03-14 00:00
2009-03-14 23:59
Etc/GMT-7

Anarkink presents: Post-Bookfair Sexy Good-Time Fun Party!

For kinky (and curious) anarchists and their friends.

Saturday, March 14th
9pm-2am
2192 Folsom (at 18th) SF CA
$5-15 sliding scale donation
(no one turned away for lack of funds)

* rope bondage performance by Mike West
* spanking and flogging booth
* beats by dj tomk@t and Miss Gawker (SPAZ)

(you must be 18+ to attend)

Anarkink is a group of anarchists and anti-authoritarians who practice or are interested in BDSM. Proceeds from this party will help us secure a regular meeting space and ensure that our workshops can be free for everyone. More info at http://anarchistbdsm.wordpress.com.

** Volunteer and get in free! Write to subversivesub@gmail.com for details. **

i really wish kinky

i really wish kinky anarchists didn't mean BDSM anarchists

yeah, there are so many

yeah, there are so many other ways to be kinky (or not vanilla) than restraining your partner(s). anonymous sexplay is kinky even if the actual activities are vanilla. anonymity also fosters an ease with homoerotic contacts in a way that actually meeting and courting or seducing someone cannot, what with the ingrained homophobia of this society. can we work on setting up a safe-sex-positive sexplay space instead of focusing on BDSM?

I find it interesting that

I find it interesting that an anarchist would be turned on by authority and domination.

And I find it interesting

And I find it interesting that your feeble mind can't distinguish between reality and role-playing.

-postnihilist

To be turned on by role-play

To be turned on by role-play is bridging the gap between reality and role-play, because then there comes a very real response to that game. And for an anarchist to be turned on by the notion of authoritarianism is just mildly ironic.

That's because BDSM only

That's because BDSM only provides the illusion of authority and dominance. It's actually based on an incredible affinity and shared trust between the participants. It is sexual dominance, not social or political dominance. Having someone take control of your sexual responses and dominance of your sexual stimulation can be very arousing and refreshing (I've never done it, shit, I'm a virgin, but what I've read, the people involved say it has nothing to do with coercion or actual domination).

No more ironic than you

No more ironic than you trying to tell people what sexual acts they can and can't engage in.

-postnihilist

Oh no, that's not at all

Oh no, that's not at all what I'm saying. People can engage in any mutual sexual activity they want to. It just seems to be a peculiar fetish for an anti-authoritarian. No hard feelings cause I certainly feel that we can act on any mutual sexual desires we have.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.