The Contemptuous Communique #4

thought you were done with anews after communique #1...?

The Contemptuous
Communique #4
We Bring Flamethrowers
to the Snow Storm

“My passions, concentrated on a single point, resemble the rays of a sun assembled by a magnifying glass: they immediately set fire to whatever object they find in their way.”
- Marquis de Sade

“When someone interprets as derogatory almost anything that is said about him (or about groups with whom he identifies) we conclude that he has inferiority feelings or low self-esteem…Low self-esteem, depressive tendencies and defeatism are not restricted to the Left. Though they are especially noticeable in the Left, they are widespread in all of our society.”
- Ted Kaczynski

Fragility becomes a virtue when all can play at being wounded victims. The pathology of civilization has developed into a sort of Munchausen. For all the lip service to resisting patriarchy, in the end what all these victims want is a paternal savior: daddy, doctor, social worker.

Everyone has become a snowflake. Everything is too difficult, too offensive, too problematic to handle. It must be banned, cancelled, or deplatformed for these sad sacks to avoid going into tremors of distress. Between the left and the right, we are being crushed. The left wants to take away my Jünger. The right wants to take away my avant-garde queer smut. Come and get it. You'll have to pry them out of my cold dead hands. And yes, as you can see, we love war and perversity.

An anonymous commenter on ANews said of our second communique, "Of course they quote Ernst Jünger... of course. So Fucking Cringe". But of course you cringe; you can't look straight on to anything you have been programmed to consider problematic, offensive, wrongthought. Someone asserted to you that Jünger was bad, that years after his death he is contagious still. You put on a good guy badge and cringe away. Merely reading a book by him is becoming a node of infectious spread in a deluded mirage of emergent fascism. If you had actually read Jünger you would find that there is no fascism hidden in there, that he had even rejected his initial nationalism early on in his writing career. But you have not read him. I suspect you have read very little, other than the smartphone flickers you passively absorb.

"Of Course" this was on AnarchistNews, the 4Chan of anarchy. The comment section rivals the intelligence of the comment section of PornHub. The anonymous commentators practice deploying recombinant cliches, often responding to themselves as if they were another user. The users come in two basic flavors: the easily offended leftist and the transgressive who transgress no boundaries. Some complain that the moderators delete too many posts. You should be glad that The Contemptuous are not the moderators, because if we were... poof, no comments, no posts, the server seems to have been unplugged.

ANews is mostly infested by people whose thinking was entirely based on the proclamations of Aragorn! When we lost him, most lost their ability to think. They didn't know what to think when January 6th happened, so they turned to the media. Here they were told that fascists threatened democracy, so they believed it, as if it were still 2017. Those with awareness knew that this LARP had no possibility of succeeding. We did get a good laugh out of Ashlee Babbit's glamour headshot, caught on video for all to see. What a hair flip. Enchanting.

Jünger is one of a whole list of authors you are not allowed to read. In the Alex Jones style chalkboard fever dreams of the antifa researcher, contact with these books transforms the reader into a potential node of contagion. The antifa researcher becomes a contact tracer, charting out all of the contacts you may have infected, each that may have infected you. The justification is the idea that there is an emergence of fascism in this country. But who is the fascist threat in this country? The Proud Boys? Hardly. Their politics are some sort of cretin populism, not fascism. This should be taken as further evidence against populism and democracy. The gang themselves are something that only a fashion columnist could have created. Formerly they looked like a combo of insecure hipsters and third string extras/fluffers in a rough trade flick. Now their membership is primarily middle-aged suburbanites with nasty beards and faces that look like crabapples. To hear them speak is to hear the sounds of worms eating brains. Patriot Front? They can't even successfully pull off a viral video shoot without getting arrested or beat up by the locals. But they sure are good at sticker sales.

But antifa types need the fascists in order to give their lives meaning. They transform themselves into para-state actors in this fight. Like the mainstream hate watch groups, they need to give the impression that there are more and more hate groups, always on an upward trajectory. Where Southern Poverty Law and such do this to drag in funding, antifa folks do so to give themselves a virtue to signal. But let us take a break. How about we get a little chuckle? What do you call an undercover agent that has infiltrated a Nazi group? A Nazi! So, what do you call an antifa researcher who goes undercover infiltrating a Nazi group?

It is worth considering how many Proud Boys are feds. We know that some are. Could the whole thing be a psy-op? It is also worth considering whether Alexander Reid Ross is an agent. Remember, not all agents know they are agents.

Just making criticisms like this can get one branded as a MAGAite or fascist adjacent. It has become impossible for leftists to believe that anyone could critique the left from a consistent anarchist position. Or critique identity politics from a consistent queer position, for that matter. We might go hard on the left, but that's because they are the ones we are most likely to interact with, the most likely to populate the anarchist space. Still, we don't forgive them. They've stolen too much. They stole insurrection and redefined it as a most radical revolution. They stole queer and redefined it as bisexual communist (in the best case. More likely bisexual social democrat). They've even tried to steal primitivism and egoism. Yet anarchists stand back, afraid that they will be labeled a reactionary, a fascist, or worse if they put up a stink. But we know that anything could be used as evidence anyways. Hell, a psychic bird could tell you we are fascists and you'd believe them. [That actually happened.]

Just look at the reaction to the 3rd communique, specifically a passing reference to "Dis-membering". On AnarchistNews, Lumpy was triggered particularly hard by this word. He wrote "Don't forget this particular little scumbag is now signing off with a generalized death threat at the end". Later he started rambling about us giving helicopter rides to leftists (Was he mixing us up with Moxie?). We are happy to report that Lumpy's meds have been adjusted and he is showing positive progress. Clearly the word was written by us in such a way as to signal elimination of membership. But, yes, it was also a play on words. You see, we at The Contemptuous hold Valerie Solanos in extremely high regard. Inspired by her, we intend to undermine all phalocentric logic & normativity (both hetero & homonormativitiy). Some of us at The Contemptuous are queer, and those who aren't, it isn't for lack of trying. The verdict is in: Lumpy is homophobic and transphobic.

But just to be clear, the snowflake syndrome is fully distributed through the entire system. The right cries about anyone who doesn't agree with them, wants to ban books, ban drag shows. The anarchist left have a programmed response to this; adopting all the positions that progressive media tell them they should, maybe adding a few anarchist buzzwords. They do the appropriate hand wringing over issues like transgenderism. Don't get your panties in a bunch. My panties certainly aren't. For the appropriate response isn't hand wringing, pearl clutching, or anything of the sort. We must be colder, crueler, and harsher, say the things that need to be said, speak truth to power. The problem is the left still believes in some sort of inherent dignity and human rights within all. They want to wear their good-guy badges. Sometimes we just need to be bad guys, but we're not wearing any badge. We need to be willing to tell a "Moms for Liberty" type, that if they feel the need to protect a child from inappropriate books, maybe that child doesn't deserve to be protected. If a kid isn't reading at an adult level by the time they are in high school (well, middle school if we are being honest), then that kid probably will never be able to read at an adult level. The kids would read more sex in a Stephen King novel than most of what these snowflakes want to ban. Their kids should be called out for their incompetence. Maybe if their children are too fragile to see a drag show that is less sexually explicit than any music video played after school in the 90s, it is symptomatic of a deeper psycho-sexual issue. Maybe these moms for liberty need some therapy for the trauma inflicted by the liberties their dads took? We are through with feeling sympathy for the herd. The opinions of these sorts are not worth giving credibility to.

This isn't a centrist both-sides-ism position. Yes, they are two sides of the same coin, but we do not intend to redeem and unify the coin. We hate radical centrists too. We intend to melt down the coin and use the metal to cast bullets. Don't worry that the metal content of coins has been devalued, we don't need silver bullets. We are not intending to hunt werewolves or monsters, after all. Because we are the monsters. Some might complain we are "forced try hard writing", but how else should one achieve appropriate velocity? You might think you are the target audience, but in reality you are the target.

People have a sick predilection for needing constant support and reinforcement for their pre-existing opinions. Again, this is the same for left, right, and center. It doesn't matter if you are an anarcho-communist, pious atheist, reified egoist, space-communist, anti-civ social democrat, make-believe traditionalist, antifa transhumanist, neo-reactionary, witchy-poo back patch salesperson, or anything. You only want to see information that confirms what you already believe. The Silicon Valley technocratic controllers are more than happy to assist you in this regard, transforming you more and more into a pure representation of a demographic. A demographic profile entirely predictable to their super computers.

As for us, we like to be challenged. We actively seek out books and people that challenge our worldview. This is a more fruitful route toward anti-ideology than the passive nihilist one. The passive nihilist seeks to combat ideology by having no opinions, hedging every bet. They become simulacra of their image of Adorno, though they have never actually read him. They do have a small collection of dank Adorno memes, of which at least a third have quotes that he actually said. We seek a different route. We do not fear that having an opinion or thought locks us into a rigid pattern. We can always change our minds, or better yet incorporate new and possibly divergent ideas into them. We learned the difference from Bob Black: "Do you have ideas or do ideas have you?". There is much that can be learned from different, converse, or even hostile opinions. However, you have to actually put the effort into understanding them and working through those positions. This requires a level of resilience that few seem to have in these times.

I suspect that some might take offense to terms such as resilience, associating it with the limited notion of strength we have in these toxic times. Strength is considered masculine, while femininity is associated with weakness. This shows a further weakness of our civilization, with a limited bone-headed concept of what constitutes strength. Many factors play into strength, and even more into resilience. It says much about the projections of leftists who would default to the position of gendered binaries. They are the ones who associate women with weakness. We, on the other hand, know that all are potentially capable of resilience. There are many archetypes of feminine strength, resilience, and brutality: Lilith, Hecate, Mother Kali.

In the face of oblivion, can you hang on to the resilience to survive, to thrive? Can you hang on to the beautiful idea even when you know there is no revolution to come? Can you live without illusions? Can you slaughter your lies? Are you a snowflake that melts in the face of an indifferent sun? Are you a snowflake that wishes to give anarchs frostbite in a war of attrition? We Contemptuous ones hold flamethrowers in our hands. We will melt you.

“I think identity politics is for people that don’t have an identity.”
- Penny Arcade

“Eat shit. Ten billion flies can’t be wrong.”
- Tribe 8

*****

We'll burn you
with black flames
of invisible suns.
To us contemptuous ones
negation is fun

We burn out our enemies
before frostbite sets in,
We only settle
for peak living, liminal zones,
and sin.

The Contemptuous
contemptuous@riseup.net

There are 166 Comments

Lol, okay bro

So this band who doesn't do any music (sadly) was really just some troll on Anews. Wow. Then I sleep.

You’re right! They should release an album!

Burn baby burn! Edgelord inferno!

"this was on AnarchistNews, the 4Chan of anarchy" -the Cuntemptuous

I move thecollective rename the website to anus.chan. All in favor?

Aye!

Cunts rule!

It’s beyond embarrassing that anews is publishing this. I hope thecollective has a meeting or something and reconsiders their recent choices. There is no shortage of actual anarchist content on the web to republish.

It really is sad.

I'd understand if there was money to be made,,,,,,,,, but nope. Just straight up subcultural drama fetishists I guess? Wait,,,,,,, was Keating right?? (Fuck off, Keating!)

I've been around long enough to remember when Anews carefully thought out what they published. This edgy kid's diary of tears certainly wouldn't have made the cut before.

Nothing here would have made the cut just a few years ago, especially when Aragorn! was still alive (there is a gapping hole). The Contemptuous is a rare element breathing some life back in here. There is nothing kid-like here. What is immature is to dismiss it without ever engaging in the content.

Actually, i am glad that anews still has space for these types of rants. i find it much more interesting than the mostly lukewarm action reports (sigh), endless prisoner support info (important, but sometimes a bit repetitive), identity politics (boring), and the rehashing of the same old played-out crap. I think Aragorn! would love it!

I am glad that the dim-witted and fragile pawns on the right, left, and center all get it.

Marquis de Sade quote is perfect, Ted is spot on, Jünger is more relevant then ever, and Lumpy gets his lumps too...

One of my favorite quotes " Some might complain we are "forced try hard writing", but how else should one achieve appropriate velocity? You might think you are the target audience, but in reality you are the target."

I think The Contemptuous is a much needed tonic in the embarrassingly dismal anarchist space.

Melt All Snowflakes!!!

*Anarchists bomb a coal power plant*

Anon: that is rather luke-warm and boring

*Anarchist posts an incoherent rant about cancel culture and identity politics*

Anon: Now this is interesting. Just the tonic I need!

That those action reports are just standard boilerplate for this website, i personally get bored by them too, especially because a lot of details are left out.

However, one thing all The Contemptuous articles have in common is they are just empty: the logic is "make anarchy great again" without any mention of what was so great about classical anarchism. I would bet you there was some sort of cancel culture equivalent back in the day...maybe they could find it and write an essay about it. I don't see what they are after besides online dopamine hits, how similar they are to liberals and leftists!

i doubt they are thrilled with “classical anarchism” either. i get the feeling they are generally dissatisfied with most self-proclaimed anarchists, which i would completely agree with. that has always been the problem with the beautiful idea, most humans are too stupid, lazy, or uncreative to engage with it. this seems to be getting exponentially worse as tech and social media have become the culture. and, how are the similar to liberals and leftists???

One or two actions do not erase a hundred other ones that are literally boring as fuck. I found all of the communiques quite coherent, this particular angle gets boring too.

There is a desperate shortage of material. How is this not “actually” anarchist? The anarchist space is a virtual desert of interesting, critical, humorous, or relevant content. Thank you Contemptuous! Keep’um coming!

lol rent free inside your heads!

you want to "unplug the server", you want to "adjust my meds", you want everyone to think you're twice as clever as you are. ADORABLE! are we done here yet?

so. fuking. sad...

i mean, which one of us is the old man shouting at the cloud? i can't even tell!

funny how everyone becomes queer and/or trans directly after making very edgy jokes that strayed across the line. thought we were against identity politics? except when trying to dig ourselves out of a hole apparently?

specifically said i didn't think it was a real threat, if anyone cares to check

Old man complaining about queers wanting special privileges? That’s so Lumpy

lol get-out-of-death-threat-jail-free privileges.

i'm a prison abolitionist anyway! there's no jail. edgy jokes aren't war crimes, they're just a really ... REALLY bad look in this case.

Lumpy the attention seeking populist for anarchists, their version of The Anarchist Trump, Lumpy, lording up the attention like the frustrated megalomaniac on a messianic trip! MAKE ANARCHY GREAT AGAIN leftist rhetoric always spewing out, against the real individual anarchs who sneer at your cliches!

You DO knOw that the guy was a hobo once, could you imagine being couped up in a boxcar rolling through Nevada sippin' on some sour mash with the gang and this invisible woke bastard was whining on and ON about ideology, we're just wanting to take in the spirit of the moment, contemptuous of all ideology, just watching the desert scape roll on? DaaaAaaam!

Funny?! I don’t know who the fucking contemptuous are, but if you think being queer makes their lives easier, then I don’t know where you are coming from. Did you hear this on Fox News?

You know that's not what lumpy was saying. IF you don't see that you're either very dumb or a low effort troll. Don't let your bad faith comment choke you on the way down. Happy Pride month!

Yeah, Lump gets ironic denial, right? I am sure he didn’t see it as bigotry, but he is fucking around with it. Why did he even bring it up then? Make a real critique, don’t differ to their sexuality.

i didn't bring it up? they did?

"Some of us at The Contemptuous are queer, and those who aren't, it isn't for lack of trying. The verdict is in: Lumpy is homophobic and transphobic." <---- this part?

where in response to a criticism about choice of rhetoric, they say "oh yeah?! well, some of us are QUEER"

You are totally reading this wrong. They weren’t saying the are queer to justify making edgy comments, they were making edgy comments because they are queer. Be a bad queer. Fuck normativity. “Filth is my politics”

Make Queer Queer Again!
Do you think queers are revolting?
You bet your sweet ass we are!
We come from a time and a place, an intersectional space you might say, when and where queer meant something. It was authentic and deviant and creative and exploratory and adventurous and non-recuperable. It was fun. It was raw. It was dangerous. It was vulnerable. It was real. Now, it is just another superficial and plastic identity having less to do with anything physical or emotional and more to do with holding space and power. Queerness now values inclusion above individuality. It values acceptance over autonomy. It values synthetic safety over wild abandonment. It values fashions over uniqueness.….and it seems to have very little to do with actually experiencing the endlessly wild continuum of living sexually and sensually.
We want a queerness that is more moved by actual fluids
than abstractions of fluidity.
We want a queerness that never seeks to be accepted or understood,
but is queer for its own sake.
We want a queerness that cannot be reified, commodified, and politicized.
We want our mama’s queerness back, when it was wild and free!
Make Queer Queer Again!

YeeHah, LETS MAKE IDENTITY TYPES POLITICALLY GREAT AGAIN so I can become President of Queer Muhrica again in 2024!

Yup, 'bout time Jünger received the praise he deserved !

Theodore Roosevelt too! The OG uncle Teddy has a lot to teach anarchists.

Also Himler.

Rough ridahs woah!

I WAS A SUICIDAL JAPANESE KAMIKAZE PILOT WHO READ ERNST JÜNGER AND DITCHED MY PLANE IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN!!

Yeah, this isn’t just a stupid stretch. Let’s just hyperbolically compare things so we don’t have to hint. Sign of the times.

Aw my comment about Junger being useless for anarchists made them so upset they.... *checks notes*.... blogged about it with some other edgy stuff.

Terrifying ;-)

This is a content free post. You have no critique of Junger. Make a point or shut up.

"Shyuaaaaat uuuuuup! Leave Junger aloOoooone!" *cries*

What’s wrong with crying, Womack? Hold me…

For someone that is so cringe, it sure seems hard for people to make a single substantive criticism of Junger.

and some anarchists who have no more loyalty to leftism. Sure the man wasn't perfect and he's not someone that you should make a primary figurehead(from a Stirnerian perspective) but he's a nice side chick. Better then most leftists and, indeed, many anarchists.

His aesthetics and writing alone make the cut.

It’s been stated a thousand times since the first edgelord tried to creep Junger’s writings into the anarchist conversation. But since you’re ignorant here’s a quick note: Junger’s anarch is an authoritarian worshipper of authority Anarchists are anti authoritarians They are not compatible. Junger was never repentant if the Nazi association or nationalist position. He was an authoritarian. His work and philosophy is authoritarian. It is incompatible with anarchy and is a waste of time for anarchists to polish his turd.
Got it?

You obviously never bothered to read the key passages in Eumeswil. Junger's anarch is essentially agnostic to authority not pro or anti. His agnostic forest fleeing position is pretty consistent. You might think that's a limitation(I certainly do) but that is not worshipping authority.

It'd be um..... swell, if people did even the most basic searches before making assertions based on their boners for dead, white, authoritarian men.

I am an anarch – not because I despise authority, but because I need it. Likewise, I am not a nonbeliever, but a man who demands something worth believing in.

Although I am an anarch, I am not anti-authoritarian. Quite the opposite: I need authority, although I do not believe in it. My critical faculties are sharpened by the absence of the credibility that I ask for. As a historian, I know what can be offered.

The Anarch is to the anarchist, what the monarch is to the monarchist.
— Ernst Jünger

It'd also be um, swell if anarchistnews fixed the search function because this has been talked about to death before on this very website.

I'd rather be burning down police stations or making love than licking a dead, German, authoritarian's boots in a pointless discussion on Anews with an edgy troll, personally.

I have read Junger and more dead white authors that you can imagine. I am a lecturer of comparative lit that also teaches classes in continental philosophy. So you can knock it off with the toddler games of "well I bet you've never read xyz," because I assure you I have, kid.

He is saying the Anarch is their own authority. It is literature. Did you read the novel? Do you remember how it ends?

Reading a novel is licking the author’s boots? Do you have a safe word for library visits? I mean you sound maybe mentally I’ll, but also kinda fun…

Reading comprehension is required on internets?!? Capybara are mammalian therefore have tiddies?

Is the imperative to insulate oneself away from and against society. It's not quite what I would call anti-societarian but it's closer to that then most anarchists particularly those who don't have those Stirnerian foundations and are suckers for the social form(society).

YeeEes, I am the king of the anarchs, DO nOt invAde mY AUra, my dAsein. Nothing wrong with this autonomous facete within the anarch continuum.
Long life the Contemptuous!

“I work at a community college, so knock it off. I am the authority, brah.”

Congrats on the publication of the paper: “Semiotic Iconography of Fascism in the novel ‘Superfudge’”

wow, using search engines instead of actually reading the texts. brilliant. you cherry pick your quotes from google searches. i don't actually believe you read junger, and if you did, you read it with assumptions you can not get past. first, nobody said idolize anyone. second junger has some interesting things to think about and challenge simplistic assumptions. third, he is talking about personal power. forth, its not a matter of burning down police stations or reading, i can do both, any idiot can just burn down a police station, and, any alienated dweeb can just read. fifth, blah, blah, blah, how many times are idiots gonna write off someone by boxing them into "dead white guys", its just plain stupid. i read all sorts of folks from all sorts of perspectives. i think that's kind of what the essay was saying too. and finally, because junger was already discussed here, we should not read or discuss him anymore? kid?

Nobody can hear you over all your pearl clutching, 13:08. Junger is dead he can't pat you on the head and call you "Guter Junge" as you praise his authoritarian ideas to anti-authoritarians.

Additionally, saying "use a search engine" does not equal "use a search engine instead of reading a book." But since we're 12, let me try: I, in fact, do not believe that YOU have read Junger's work. You offer no proof and your many comments here show little understanding beyond what one might have read on Redding or the chans. You are pretending to be able to read just like you are pretending to be an anarchist. Additionally, my mother could beat the shit out of your father. And you're ugly.

Ridiculous, illiterate troll.

ooOoo nOoooo only pasting a brief quote instead of the pasting the entire book into the comments field means you haven't read the based book that is eumeswil! u are no anarch! daddy ernst will not be pleased oooOooo nOoooo!

wow. i only wrote one comment concerning junger, so don't attribute all of them to me. but, i know, everyone who thinks differently than you are all the same.

i have read Eumeswil, which was suggested to me by anarchists i respect as his most interesting and relevant work, and an author that leftists don't want us to read. i think it is very applicable to anarchists who are critical thinkers, not as a bible or ideology, but as a strong counterpoint to anarchist pitfalls, dogma, and practice. i just started glass bees, i will let you know, well not you, but others. i have no interest in earlier works which he evolved from....but, as a lecturer at some low-cred community college i am sure, if that is even true, you know what is best for everyone. you idiot.

have you tried the turner diaries, brow? there is some based stuff in there for the evolved anarch to consider fleshing out their anarch position. look into it. college is for dumb chumps. i just go to the library like good will hunting except fuck the hollywood liberal elite!

Nein! Nein! Nein! Ze jumping auft point must be ze Notes of Herr Himler! Only ze anarch educated zis was can Overcome the retarded leftist anarchist scourge! Then our daseins can bring about the new reign of radical anarch ego contemptuousness!

Do you consider Hogan’s Heroes a documentary?

Hmm,
Vaneigem’s “masters without slaves”?
Goldman’s aristocrats “of spirit”?
The anarchy-monarchism of Captain Nemo?

Jack off of all trades, master of none

While I was jacking all trades were you mastering the blade?

Oh you know, just getting that degree, but the Gramsci & pop culture class is a snore fest

Switch majors to ceramics. Trust me, brah.

Hilarious. I have no use for Junger, but can’t help laugh that he is saying that he isn’t an anti-authoritarian because he is a historian (academic), so he is reliant on what it offers. I am sure that hurts your feelings. I know he’s also saying other stuff, but he doesn’t concern me further. I am just happy to see that once in a generation Ziggy outsmarts someone event.

"His agnostic forest fleeing position is pretty consistent"

HUh, huh... So did he flee to a privately-owned estate in "the forest" he acquired with the comfy assets he accumulated in the capitalist, also fascist, economy like Junger himself, or was this a commons? Wait.. don't tell me he clandestinely took a place of his own in a forest, regardless the legal status and regulations applying to this place! Was he a Hunter-Gatherer?

Was he Teddy K back when it was still underground?

In the novel the Anarch clandestinely builds a bunker hidden in the forest.

Kung is the true Unique one. The anarch licks Kung's boots (breakfast) throughout the entire book.

me, bunkers are dark creepy places... why would anyone with a sane brain want that? Plus this is next door to digging your own grave and just waiting to die there. Usual stockpile of DIY explosives will just help it!

'90s survivalist brutes with beard masks aren't exactly the dream model for an anarch. Nomadism is the way, brow. Evasion is the way.

That’s just stupid. It is his novel people are referring to, and his ideas. Do you hold every work of fiction up to this standard? How about every anarchist? If so, there would be a huge vacume once you removed all the trust-funded ones, or at least those coming from a place of relative privilege. Grappling with ideas is something the modern anarchist, for the most part, will avoid at all costs. No, they swallow their position and that is that. I think that is one of the main points here.

Seems false. Please provide primary source citations to prove your assertions.

*response directed toward anon Rossite, not Squire Ziggs

ziggles the diddler himself!

there's your praise from 4/chan, saluting your contempt with his mouth fedora, ready to have long discussions with you about epheebo versus peedo. look upon your own works and despair lol

Umpy, The rant literally makes fun of Chan culture. Can you read?

How are you this dumb?
The Cuntemptuous was making fun of Anews comments section, equating it with Chan culture. Then a voice of support rings out from the comments section by non other than SirEinzige, an avid promoter and fetishist of Chan culture.
The irony is revealed to you twice and you still don't get it.
Get it now?

I can always count on you like clockwork for LOLtarded takes. It’s hilarious seeing you try to get a read on my positions and failing so spectacularly.

For one thing I didn’t praise the writing. If you recall I didn’t care for their earlier communique as it was a forced and pretentious read though still up my alley.

In regards to 4chan, I myself don’t even visit the place as it’s not for people with a handle who have substantive ideas. It’s not for me in that regards. All I’ve said(if your pea brain could pay some attention) is that @ discourse should hold some discourse territory down there and not simply be associated with the current institutional liberal/leftist structure. That doesn’t make me a 4chan fan you dumb fucking idiot.

And also, of course, being against AOC laws(you know, laws retard) and for pubescence and corresponding intelligence being the markers of consent and sexual readiness does not make me a pedo you brain wormed moron. I’ve said numerous times that I am what’s known as anti-contact. You’re just like those NPCs who lose their shit when ever anyone brings up the historical and biological reality of under 18 sex and you’re an anarchist of all people which makes it worse.

It’s all par for the course with you though Lumpy and in Golfing terms your level of intelligence and analysis doesn’t make the cut.

What's anti-contact? Autism, per chance?

No sexual contact with the kiddies(prepubescent) if not one.

Lumps literary skills/grammar/translation/comprehension reached an all-time low today, comparable to that of a 30-something hobo of the Reagan era, that's homophobic and seething ressentiment by today's standards, weird yet fascinating conservative mutation, scary.

Well now you’ve gone and done it!!!
My poor son was just put back into the institution. Police were called because he was laying on the lawn screaming “Adorable” at full volume. I tried to call Ziggy, cause you know, Lumpy has just been in a terrible state since Ziggy quit the Warhammer campaign, but he refused to come talk him down. So now Lumpy is on 48 hour observation, so thanks a lot!

i've been playing diablo 4 MOM and it rules! something something chicken tendies!

and I TOLD you i hate ziggy cuz he won't stop talking about creepy shit PLUS he's not even a real person: he's 3 nambla neo-nazis in a trench coat and he smells like a mouth fedora that watches too much anime and i hate him! and he probably cheats at warhammer too

Yeah, yeah, we all saw that episode of SVU.

Or maybe Ziggy is a Tulpa formed from the collective imagination of Anews.

Or maybe you are just dreaming. But imagine Ziggy in you mind for a moment & wonder who is the dreamer and who is the dream…

only if you imagine how depressing it would be, to be an NPC in ziggy's dream.

i'll wait. take your time, let it sink in.

OooOooh nOooo, lumps has taken it personally, nyuk nyuk nyuk!

I don't see it that was at all. Complete misuse of "OooOooh nOooo". You're on notice, 17:54. Try to be better.

I’ve come to terms with that a long time ago. Why do you think the world is so bad? Ziggy is the dungeon master and he’s lost is D12.
But at least it isn’t Diablo.

Do people know how to read anymore? The idea that the comments are more ridiculous than the "communiques" really seems to be the syphon that keeps the contemptuous going (for the dense commentariat: a syphon uses gravity to move liquid from a higher position to a lower one), despite both trading in rhetorical piss the contemptuous is not only condemned they are misread in blatant and ridiculous ways. Somehow the comment section manages to drain the bucket of dehydrating urine and put it in the kiddy pool where we seem to enjoy splashing it on our (probably) ugly faces. But seriously, most people trying to take this shit down with whity comments have below average reading comprehension when there isn't clearly delineated semiotic decoders available. Fucking pathetic. And publishing criteria goes out the window on this site if they publish a WashPo article when Uncle Ted goes and put out anything that liberal maoist gang of poseurs at Crimethinc vomits onto their menagerie of online marketing strategy.

> syphon

>>siphon

keep going contemptuous ... I enjoy your writings

Okay so basically this is another long ranting Anews comment set up as an article...

The Emile bot back in the days at least was putting more efforts (even professionalism) in their writings. Now everything can be an Anews article!

wait a tick, I thought communiques were to report something happening?

What about the communiques of the association of ontological anarchy?

“Let every dirty, lousy tramp arm himself with a blog or a Twitter, and sit in gaming chairs in the furnished basements of their moms and rant at or cry about the actual anarchists that think they're goofballs. Let us quote reactionary writers out of context without mercy, and let it be a cringe blogpost good enough for Anews to republish.”—the Cuntemptuous

nOooooo yOoou are the one who is so far off the mark! completely out of funky bunch territory!

i think the action that the communique is explaining is the intervention on the overwhelming stupidity and fragility of the anarchist space. much appreciated.

Imma newbie here, hello fellow cerebral anarchs of the free spirit tendency, this Contemptuous is JUST WHAT I wanted/expected on an anarchic site. Bravo!

Shameless!

just don't take these communiques as targeting yourself. just enjoy what can be useful in them (as in everything else). they are targeting a generic ghost (leftism). i can bet that the contemptous at some point will also joke about themselves if they really want to be iconoclast. do you get the point? sarcasm is very liberating! there is no anarchy without it.

in their first communique they said —

"In recent decades, the North American anarchist subculture has become at once corpulent with bad ideas yet sclerotic in accepting new ones. "

are we to believe that Ernst Jünger is dealing in "new" ideas?

damn, people really can get tripped up by one thing, nobody puts anything into larger contexts here. y'all are hopeless. but to respond, no, junger is not new, but his work has recently come to more people's attention lately, so in some ways, mostly new to many anarchists.

lol

y'all

ain't nobody tripping, son. just pointing to one of many sclerotic ideas passing as new. but please, do keep reading your fascist adjacent novels while pretending to be @ .

They make headphones now that you can put on when you’re feeling overwhelmed, brow

regard

"The Contemptuous hold Valerie Solanos in extremely high regard. "

how high? spelled her name wrong high, that's how high.

The Contemptuous was too busy repainting our room in the Nude House to run spellcheck. Cut me some slack! God, y'all!

To these mods. I thought the first thing you posted was kinda vapid and dumb, but i cant say i disagree with any part of this communique...

Thank you. The vapid and dumb such as me need you. Friendship has become a wretched thing of the past.

I only dispute this notion that the left can actually steal anything. Oh well. Signing off...

LOL I don;'t even disagree with what these people wrote about this site and its commenters and the leftist anarcho-spazzes that see fAsCiSm everywhere they look.

However, the whinging of authors of this communique seem severely triggered. It's pique irony and it's delish.

“ We did get a good laugh out of Ashlee Babbit's glamour headshot, caught on video for all to see. What a hair flip. Enchanting.”

I loved when that happened.

this was the best communique yet, biting, hilarious, and on fucking point.

its my estimation that 80% of the commenters didn't read and/or comprehend it.

tired of the comments, where can we find a better venue?

warms my heart to see over a 100 comments on a post for this site. I've read all the contemptuous communiques at this point and sometimes they make me laugh. sometimes they make me think. I'm trying not to take any of it too seriously. To those saying these posts should be suppressed-- to what end? It's talking about anarchist ideas. It's not like the masses are beating down the doors to post here. We've got room.

Agreed. What would be the reason not to have them posted Here? Disagreement, discomfort, and even annoyance are all needed for growth. I find people’s responses here to be a sight of these sad self referential and alienated times. We need more ruffling of feathers.

Best piece of "allow fash authors in our anarchy or else u LEFTIST!" logic fallacy in a while.

If you start your texts intentionally quoting wife-beaters and borderline neonazis just don't be surprised you get REACTIONS, on an anarchist website, dumbasses.

Goad didn’t beat his wife. He beat up an abusive girlfriend. He hasn’t changed since AK press published his first book.
Junger was a Revolutionary Conservative when young. He actively sabotaged the Nazi regime, as a military officer. Others have whined about fighting since people first tried to sneak him into the anarchist space. Really? How old are you? There are issues of Fifth Estate from the 80s with quotes from him. But daddy Bookchin & special agent Reid Ross say he bad!

The responses to this piece are just awful. Almost no one addressed the substance, though the comments did provide ample evidence to support the thesis. They showed pretty clearly that a news is no post-left anarchist space, not even really an anarchist space. Frankly it reminds me of Processed World’s attacks upon Bob Black. Though don’t get me wrong, the Anews commenters would never have the motivation to take the level of action PW did. We should be glad for that, if some of the commenters ever actually had power they would be organizing book burnings. Proves this posts thesis that they want to control what offends them.
Also not a single comment on the criticisms directed against the right?
Also not a single comment about the theme of resilience?

If you are more like Bob Black and less like his haters I think that future authentic counter cultures will be kind to you. No one will remember the morons who cancelled BB, Hakim Bey or more recently Wolfi Landstreicher.

True to that. Anyone with something real, interesting, critical, and pointed will always be targeted by those with absolutely nothing to say.

You play a great victim! Poor you I will subscribe to you blog!

Who is this directed towards? Ziggy? He wasn’t calling himself a victim, he was complaining about the people who cancelled others. The original commenter? For calling the responses stupid? How is that playing the victim? I suppose they are victims in the sense that they had to read your comments to this post. Isn’t that punishment enough?

19:49 aka the Cuntemptuous aka thin-skinned, fash-lovin' blogger that must reply to every reply. But we can add Ziggy to it too since why not.

Good logic. Keep up the conspiracy theories. Maybe Musk will hire you to crack the Twitter files? Really solved that mystery.

Why do you think only the contemptuous would respond? That is some absurd self-absorbed logic, and kinda paranoid. There are still a few anarchists out here, other than the contemptuous who aren’t leftists and have thoughts. And, calling shit what it is is not playing the victim game.

The contemptuous resonate with the unique individualism of the anti-anon SirE and Leway who hold the beacon for the anti-statist freethinkers of the Abyss!

The Contemptuous, SirE and Leway are quite the impressive face of this contemptuous form of anarch-y! I predict a huge success based on the representation alone!

I don't think SE or myself can be categorized or said to adhere to any "form of anarch-y" because we recognise uniqueness and the boundless creative abyss this describes, however, yes, peripheraly there is congruence towards the Contemptuous spirit towards snowflakes.

themselves as a collective:

"They've stolen too much. They stole insurrection and redefined it as a most radical revolution. They stole queer and redefined it as bisexual communist (in the best case. More likely bisexual social democrat). They've even tried to steal primitivism and egoism. Yet anarchists stand back, afraid that they will be labeled a reactionary, a fascist, or worse if they put up a stink. But we know that anything could be used as evidence anyways. Hell, a psychic bird could tell you we are fascists and you'd believe them. [That actually happened.]"

Yup, they like to play the victim. I think to a certain extent they are correct since leftists are constantly bullying/humiliating people who disagree with them, but this claim that anyone can steal ideology and ideas is pretty lame, cowardly, manipulative, etc.

how is it playing victim to point out what happened or is happening? They are actually calling for fighting for and taking it back from leftists....and how is it cowardly, lame or manipulative.....just throwing out words now

posts here...I will see them, as i read more comments than articles on here. Sorry if that makes me an idiot, i can't be as smart as The Contemptuous. Some things will never be. As I said before, I am pitiful and stupid and I need help with basic tasks obviously.

How is it possible to "steal" any of the sacred ideas that they are whining that the leftists have stolen from them?

You could also reduce every essay that the contemptuous as "just throwing words out there" if you wanted to. Playing the victim means pretending that someone has done something to you when they haven't. Claiming that someone stole certain revolutionary or "true anarchist" concepts from you is the perfect example. If you think it's possible to steal egoism, insurrection, queer, and primitivism...then yes, you are pretending that some fictitious entity is ruining your life, and you as the victim wants to hold other people responsible.

How can we possibly have primitivism stolen from us when there is plenty to hunt and gather? Have you ever been to a grocery store, or read about a mass shooting in a standard news outlet? Cannibalism is the perfect form of primitivist behavior. So is shoplifting, standard hunting, making fires, camping, etc.

How is it possible to steal egoism when all animals by default are egoists? How is it possible to steal queer when queer is just a vague label to describe a lot of things outside of normative social values? How it possible to steal insurrection when insurrection is a form of theft? If you don't like people criticizing your precious contemptible, then there are plenty of conspiracy theory sites...tell them about how the leftists on anarchist news are stealing beautiful ideas and come up with plots of how to steal them back. You can always default to groups persecuting you if the miseries of daily life are not enough. People are such self-tormenters, sometimes i think of killing myself, and i probably should. There is no shortage of self-pitying misery among humans. Luckily for you, there are also psychiatric medications.

Contemptuous Communique # 4 isn't the content we need but it is the content we deserve

not to kink shame you or anything but could you not royal "we" your bootlicking?

if you want to crouch down and simp for your contemptuously fashy adjacent mommies and daddies, that's your business ...

calm down.

also happy if "bootlicking" would disappear as the fucking idiotic flamebait that it is.

...really mods? don't see why an appeal to "calm" has anything to do with this sad little display

i'm aware it's a meme

twitter bullshit like "simp for your contemptuously fashy adjacent mommies and daddies,", i thought you would realize by now that anews trolls are constantly defending writers on here even when the criticism is accurate. Who doesn't like to lick a fresh leather pair of boots and get whipped every once in a while? Does paying your internet bill on time make you a bootlicker? Even if you don't pay for your own internet bill (unfortunately, i pay for both of mine...), you are dependent on someone who is, which does not cleanse you of your bootlicker status.

I mean fuck, do you ever get sick of the "fascist" ad-hominem, ever? If you are after troll thrills, i would suggest you take it easy, because the U.S. presidential election is right around the corner. You're gonna be on here a lot, and you'll have plenty of opportunity to call everyone who disagrees with a fascist and white supremacist!

Oh, and the contemptuous, i went back and read your #3 essay about what venemous dangerous fools you guys are, and i was the one who reacted to your first essay by calling it"trumpian". Isn't it obvious what's trumpian about your whole project now? The intention wasn't to put YOU down, but your harkening-to-better-times writing style.

And to be clear what i do agree with: yes, fuck those people who try to tell you not to read Junger, i never tell people they are morally correct for reading certain books...but if you need permission to read dangerous books, then yes you are contemptible/contemptuous. If I am like every other one of your enemies because i said your writing style is trumpian, then yes you are contemptible/contemptuous.

You guys are similar to the Attassa writers, but not nearly as good. I'll defend serial killer worshippers before i harken back to the good ol' days!

How do you know this isn’t outtakes from Attassa 3?

that is the whole purpose of the whole premise of Attassa if you didn't know!

But yes i get it's all a trick, and that thought did cross my mind quite honestly lol

do I ever get sick of reactionaries who all think they're so special and insightful but it's always the same misdirected hostility?

sure!

will I ever stop pointing it out?

nope.

what would we ever do without lumpy's perpetual misguided arrogance. what's "misdirected" professor lumpy? and "reactionary" is a loaded term that often gets applied to anyone who is against something.
i thought lumpy was taking some time off to gather his thoughts.

Well Lumpy's kind right, in how you're having your face stomped on a daily basis and yet instead of hitting back at those doing this you're just doing what they'd like you to do... which is to kick at everybody else.

The police are usually very "loaded" by themselves. In every meaning of the term.

Wow! Celebrity sighting: it is Derrick Jensen! Didn’t know you still came on Anews

I dunno if he's still here, but pretty sure DJ's still coming on salmon.

Whoever uses the internet is a reactionary capitalist bootlicker!

i don't think anyone was asking permission, just that how lame it is that so-called anarchists jump to the "fashie" charge with almost no reason.

absurd to call it trumpian in content or style. that’s just empty mud. i still have yet to read anyone actually engage with what they have written in any of the communiques. and who said anything about “the good ol’ days”. i didn’t read that anywhere. trashing the present doesn’t glorify the past. if i find any issue with the contemptuous folks, it is that they wasted their time on the fools here. feels like they are still a bit romantic in these desolate times.

It would be especially good for it to go away since “bootlicker” is a well known homophobic dog whistle term.

“cIs, crAcKeR, aNd aCaB aRE hATE spEeCh!!1!!”

No. But bootlicker is a slur for a sub, which you know is often kinda the basis for homophobia. Comparing this to the those other three is clearly an attempt to obscure this, a common alt-right tactic. Are you the one who was posting slurs in the comment section for the crime thing poster?

Why not instead of complaining you simply recommend a less problematic alternative that won't hurt feelings or be based in a homophobic slur even if the meaning of the term in this context has changed over time?

Let me try:

1. Instead of saying "bootlicker" why don't people say, "You, sir, are a person who is so submissive to people in positions of power that you would likely do anything they asked of you including licking the shit off of their boots to please them, but I mean this in a totally non-homophobic or slur against sexually submissive people because I believe in my hear of hearts that this is totally okay.".

Or

2. Instead of saying "bootlicker" why don't people say, "You, sir, are simping for authority but just because simp rhymes pimp I am in no way drawing conclusions about your profession that could perhaps involve sex work, which is work."

You are welcome.

best piece from yall so far keep drilling down! you can do it you can find the magic sauce. i didnt believe before but now im rooting for you

If you like it why not help the author out at:

Cashapp: blackandgreenpress
Vanma: blackandgreen
Paypal: blackandgreen

Thanks y'all!

that's funny, but KT couldn't ever write something like this. there's no cherry-picked anthro to back his claims and he's too busy worrying about the next election...no really. fuck kevin, he's a poser.

KT has more to him than you give credit. In fact he contains multitudes. Or multiples, or something

The anarchic poetry shines through,
Shards of reality slicing as they fall,
Through the things we hold in contempt,
The anarch bards are the only ones with balls.

*shart

*Sharts

NooOoo yoU mOrOns, 'shards' as in -- shards of glass, long slivers, acutely angled segments,,,,

you know, the shrill trolling on this site usually smothers a more interesting discussion but maybe it's worth a last reminder

i'm also sympathetic to the post-left critiques, i'm not uncritical of the vampire castle, if i didn't think these screeds veered way too far in the other direction, there would be plenty of common ground.

i'm not exclusively a creature of the internet, i have to deal with the scumbags who peddle liberal identity all the damned time. i count many of those pathetic huckster cry-bullies as my active enemies in the streets. they never face me, only constantly try to poison everyone against me and my friends until it stops working because the sum total of what we do makes their shitty little arguments dry up and blow away on the wind.

some perspective, for anyone who's bothering to think harder than just memes

Add new comment