Anti-Eviction Riots in Barcelona

On Monday, May 26, police from the Mossos d'Escuadra evicted the 17-year-old squatted social center Can Vies, starting at the atypically late hour of noon, perhaps due to heavy morning rains. Can Vies had an open eviction date, but the choice of day was to be expected as Sunday was elections for the European Parliament (which, incidentally, saw a sharp increase in the presence of far right and far left parties). The party in power never wants to start unpredictable conflicts in the weeks before an election, and the day after an election, the media is full of related news.

People were locked down inside the squat and over a thousand came to show their support, but the police presence was formidable and supporters were kept a couple blocks away; they did, however, block three major roads at the important intersection of Plaça de Sants with banners and chains. All in all, the eviction took about six hours to execute, and the forces of order immediately proceeded to tear the building down.

Can Vies was an emblematic social center in the neighborhood of Sants, and had waged a long campaign of resistance against its eviction, based on legal battles and winning neighborhood support, also allying with transport workers in the CGT (as the building, owned by the rail company, had once been ceded to the union, a fact that enabled Can Vies to win a trial several years back). Can Vies was an important social center in both anarchist and Catalan independence circles (although only the more libertarian wing thereof). In the last months the Barcelona government opened negotiations with them and offered to call of the eviction if they agreed to limit certain activities (e.g. concerts) and pay a symbolic rent. Fortunately the social center refused legalization.

During the anti-eviction gathering, about a hundred people broke away and snaked through the narrow streets of Sants, blocking intersections with dumpsters and taunting police units guarding the back entrance to the squat. People were not masked, but this was only a prelude.

That evening at 8, there was a call-out for a protest to meet in a plaza nearby. A heavy rain began just before the hour, but despite the Mediterranean intolerance for precipitation, over a thousand people came out. Half an hour in, just as the demo was getting ready to start, the sun appeared. And with it, the police helicopter.

A hundred people or more had already masked up, and well, with the aid of umbrellas and a sheltered area in the plaza. Slowly, twenty meters at a time, the demo marched forward, the tension building as it covered the two blocks to Plaça de Sants, within sight of Can Vies. The only police in sight were Guardia Urbana blocking the nearby roads—Carrer de Sants and Joan Güell—a large force of riot cops far behind the march protecting the train station, and one riot van (presumably the first of many) visible on the corner next to Can Vies.

At this point with a megaphone the organizers of the march thanked everyone for coming and announced that the protest was now over (disconvoked, and therefore no longer their legal responsibility), but they added ominously that Can Vies would live on. There was a period of tense waiting, punctuated by the banging of a solidarity hammer on a sidewalk billboard made of some indestructible plastic. Then fifty masked anarchists broke away, charging the cop blocking traffic on Joan Güell. The urbano jumped in his car and sped off, bottles flying in his wake. Wasting no time, the anarchists closed on the satellite van of a progressive TV station and smashed its windows out. A nearby bank met the same fate. Dumpsters were dragged and tipped to barricade the street, and along with the media van they were soon engulfed in flames. Everything was done quickly, calmly, and with determination, and the block stayed, if not tight then at least together, given the variety of objectives being accomplished at the same time. They returned to the march, met with cheers.

Now the anarchists led the march up Carrer de Sants, away from the center. Banks and cellphone stores had their windows smashed out, dumpsters were dragged into the streets, nearly always with someone leading the way to assure that fellow protestors were not run over, and nothing else was touched.

After no more than two minutes, sirens could be heard and flashing blue pierced the evening sky, reflecting eerily off the walls. People began to run but the anarchists held up their hands, many now holding hammers, poles, bottles, or molotov cocktails, and prevented a route. Dumpsters were arranged into barricades and set on fire, and people moved to defend them.

More than half of the protest had already been cut off by the van-charge, more a psychological maneuver than anything else, but there were at least two hundred people, mostly masked, arrayed behind the barricades. A minute later the police charged in earnest, driving over the banner with which some brave and unmasked protestors tried to hold them back, and right up to the line of barricades. Riot squads leaped out, clubs in hands, and the retreat began. Some anarchists tried to encourage a direct resistance, and many objects were thrown, slowing the police advance, but on the wide street the crowd inexorably backed away, eventually breaking into a run as the cops pushed aside the barricades and began another van-charge.

Half of the anarchists went to the right, into a residential neighborhood of narrow streets, and half went to the left, in the direction of the railroad tracks, a zone filled with construction sites and underpasses impassable to vehicles.

Once in these neighborhoods, they quickly stopped running and began defending the streets, blocking the way with burning dumpsters and in a couple cases parked motorcycles. Others began picking away stones to throw. Although the activity was often frenetic, the atmosphere was inspiring. Rioters looked out for one another, communicated on police positions and the best place to set up barricades, when to set them on fire and when not to. Anarchists constantly worked to prevent panic and limit retreats to what was strictly necessary. When running they looked over their shoulders to gauge what police were doing and communicate this to their comrades. People who threw stones in ways that could hurt others were reprimanded; in a characteristic incident someone stomped out a dumpster fire someone else was setting, then apologized and suggested the fire be set once the barricade was in place and not in the middle of the crowd. Many neighbors cheered from balconies or insulted the police. A couple motorcycles were tipped over as barricades and a car with the misfortune of getting trapped by riot police had its windows smashed in the crossfire, but the attitude and atmosphere were consistently more solidaristic, respectful, and calm than on May Day.

Next began a long period of street fighting with the riot police. Barricades were defended, sometimes abandoned, sometimes retaken. Some charges were stopped, others led to temporary routes. After more than a couple minutes of inactivity the crowd preferred to move on rather than risk the police being able to surround them. A couple times divided groups reconverged, sometimes on Carrer de Sants itself, right under the noses of the columns of riot cops.

After a strong campaign against the use of rubber bullets (the kind of high-caliber round of hard rubber that has caused the loss of many eyes, spleens, lungs, and other organs on the streets of Barcelona, and that can also cause death), this crowd control weapon has recently been illegalized. During the riot, the police made heavy use of a couple of their new weapons, but not the water cannon, which would be inoperable in the narrow streets being contested. Their new less-lethal ammo, referred to euphemistically as a “precision-shooter,” is also a type of rubber bullet, a long round ending in a compressible rubber ball the size of a ping pong, that causes extreme pain on impact and makes extremities “fall asleep,” fired from a gun similar in size and shape to an MP5. They also brought out their LRAD sound cannon.

In contrast to Spain's violent, rambunctious, and dangerous Guardia Civil, the Mossos d'Escuadra of Catalunya are one of the most disciplined, best trained riot squads in Europe (in a different league from the settler states in North America, where cops are less trained in crowd control and in uncontrollable situations escalate directly to military suppression via the National Guard, RCMP, etc.). On May 26, that training was evident. All police charges were disciplined, upon encountering fierce resistance units would stop their charges in unison, small groups of cops never became isolated, aided by the helicopter overhead they were not taken unawares by attacks from other directions in the maze-like streets, and on the occasions when they were forced to retreat by heavy attacks, they would go to the nearest intersection, take shelter behind riot vans and corners, and fire from cover with continuous barrages from their precision-shooters and LRADs. Even in these conditions, masked anarchists sometimes made charges, pushing dumpsters ahead of them as makeshift shields, but the material inequalities were obvious and made themselves felt.

Finally the Mossos made a sustained charge, street by street, on foot with clubs, shooters, and LRAD, backed by their riot vans. On any streets wide enough, the vans were used effectively to break lines of resistance and cause retreats. Once the crowd's supply of rocks and flammables was diminished and an increasing number of people were screaming, limping or being carried after being hit by the new rubber bullets, the retreat became a route, and the riot cops never gave people the time to resupply. At one point a part of the Black Bloc, by now fractured into at least four groups, retreated onto one of the large streets that crisscrosses Sants, reducing all of the denser neighborhoods to relatively small pockets. They took the opportunity to smash some more banks, but soon the Mossos found them and sent a column of riot vans tearing down the avenue and sending the anarchists running. Once in a zone of large streets, the bloc was dispersed.

Generally, the Mossos used empty riot vans to achieve this dispersal and inflate the appearance of their numbers. In the moment, it is always impossible to know if the van bearing down on protestors is empty, or if there are a dozen cops inside ready to spring out, and when they come four or ten at a time, it's not a bet that any but the largest or most prepared of blocs is willing to take.

The mossos had a huge number of agents on foot and with the vans, dealing with the various blocs and also pushing back the bulk of the thousand-strong protest, back in the direction of Plaça Espanya, keeping it from rejoining with the masked rioters. In the course of this operation they attacked the offices of the movement newspaper, La Directa, smashing out its windows.

In the end only two people were arrested, although more arrests can be expected. Rioting was substantial, raising the city's costs for evicting a beloved social center, but far greater than the material damages was the fierce resistance shown to police and the tactical lessons learned.

Today there is another mobilization in support of Can Vies. And these months there are other important social centers facing eviction: el Banc Expropiat in Gràcia; l'Ateneu de Eixample Dreta; Flor de Maig in Poble Nou; and Distrito VI in Navas.



Wait who are the victims and who needs to be called out I'm confused what is this? Is this another language?

Can Vies is a CSA, a "self-managed social center," an empty building that was occupied 1997 and made into a community center that has punk shows, free meals and anarchist organizing events.

Things are continuing, here are pictures to feed the Spectacle, most accurate vision of events on ground can be achieved by abandoning computer, closing eyes, and imagining.
Black storms agitate the air. More news pending publication. Don't wait around for it.

This is the article about the May Day riot that was referenced here

"Can Vies was an important social center in both anarchist and Catalan independence circles (although only the more libertarian wing thereof)..."

I was at the event, it was a vital combative event, and happily at least on Monday night there was no Catalan nationalist garbage on display, not from what I saw, other than maybe one person with a black bandana covering their face which had the stripes and star in a triangle of the Catalan flag on it.

I have it on the good authority of folks around here -- enemies of capìtalism in Barcelona -- that at present Catalan nationalism is a real problem befogging the consciousness of exploited and dispossessed people in Catalonia. It is the Catalan nationalists of the right in the Barcelona city government who are out to crush spaces like Can Vies. And on the other side of the bourgeois Bill of Fare the leftoid nationalists adopt much of the combative streety posture and imagery usually associated with anarchism to steal its thunder; for example, images of young people in hoodies and masks throwing bricks and Molotovs on posters and in street graffiti.

What I saw in the Monday night event was much more chaotic than what´s depicted here. It appears that the Mossos d Ésquadra pigs rely on their vans to repeatedly speed them around a relatively small few blocks area in an event like Monday night in Sants in part beacuse their body armor is too encumbering to allow them to move fast or for very long on foot. I was in the Metro last night and a voice on the loudspeaker announced that the Plaça de Sants metro station -- at the site of Monday´s actions -- was closed. A Barcelona Metro worker told me this was because of a manifestation, so more unrest may have occured last night.

Compared to the San Francisco Bay Area there are many libertarian atteneus in Barcelona. They tend to play a real role in the life of the working class neighborhoods in which they are situated, unlike, say, Station 40 in San Francisco, which is a safe space for posturing subculturalists to have spiky play-dates and make mudpies. Also, from what I´ve been told, Flor de Maig in Poble Nou is not currently under threat.

Corrections: Flor de Maig in Poblenou is under threat, there were definitely more riots last night, the riot cops in Barcelona can run with their armor on, but the vans are more useful to break up barricades and blocs.

I know a person who is involved with Flor de Maig, and for now I´ll take their word for it. Also, read the previous post; I never said there wasn´t more skirmishing last night. I wasn´t there so I couldn´t say one way or the other.

"Anarchists constantly worked to prevent panic and limit retreats to what was strictly necessary"

wow anarchists have really embraced their protest marshall role haven't they

was this written by the same person who called for a "calm and respectful riot" (insurrectionary critique blah blah) in that awful piece that I've been been seeing passed around tumblr by the boring ass social insurrectionists (leftists like ninjabikeslut, splatterqueer gag)

Riot police work primarily by inciting panic and fear. To work to disarm panic is to work to generalize conflict. This is hardly marshalling.

well we can tell someone here has never been in a riot. keeping people from panicing and running away makes the riot better you nitwit.

Protest marshalls use the threat of collaboration with the police or expulsion from the protest. People with more experience in the streets, anarchist or otherwise, who try to prevent stampedes or share good methods for holding the streets are operating in a completely different dynamic. They communicate suggestions (like holding up their hands and saying "don't run! stick together!") that people can choose to follow or not. They don't kick people out of the demo and obviously never collaborate wtih the pigs. In sum, you are a caricature of a ridiculous position.

"is to work to generalize conflict"

sure is insurrectionist in here. so sick of that fucking stock phrase

i remember that insurrectionary critique of may day painting a picture of far more then just "holding hands up" to influence course of a manifestation... it mentioned attacking people physically... and kicking people out...

but does it matter? does only making suggestions make someone acceptable, tolerable? that seems kind of a weird thing to say, as if that removes someone from attack or critique, the fact that they're only making suggestions that can be "followed or not".

does preventing the throwing of bottles and rocks at bystanders make a "better riot" too...?

it strange that cops only do one thing and only incite one emotion. it's almost like you're looking at them as mythological figures in some cosmic battle of good versus evil instead of people with varying tactics, desires, and emotions. it's kind of a funny tick - whatever people are uncomfortable with, that's what the cops do... if you're against panic in riot/mass situations, the cops only cause panic...

i'll say it again. anarchists are the avant-garde of protest marshalling.

also why are stampedes always bad?

what if you're trying to do something like this:

What are you even doing here ..? You seem more like the type to endlessly pontificate about things but if I ever did see you randomly whipping projectiles at bystanders unprovoked … in a riot or otherwise, of course I would kick the shit out of you and smile while I did it. I don't share any affinity with such juvenile nihilism and I'm cheerfully the agent of a reality check if it's within my power to do so. This makes me an " avant-garde protest marshal" in your eyes? Cute. Nobody cares. Fuck you.

That said, I'd make a careful distinction between this hypothetical and something that seems more plausible; people weren't being careful enough with their aim because their blood was up.

Shut the fuck up dude. We all know who you are. You have the same stupid cop-like critiques of everything. You are a stupid nihilist who is right to be excited by chaos but does not know how it could happen or how it could last. You fetishize only the most petty forms of interpersonal violence simply because it is taboo to anarchists. You like to fancy yourself as an abnormal mirror of dominant anarchist positions. Because you define yourself how you do (always against) you will always remain a pathetic pawn in the maneuvers of other people.

Your inability to see how panic freezes a riot by making people thirsty for order and peace typifies your incredible, and relentless, inability to understand crowd psychology. Probably because you've never been in a riot.

"how it could last"

we muss make da insurrezion permint *gurgles*

"fetishize" prude

Exactly. You are not interested in destroying this society or undoing this civilization. You are only interested in deconstructing hostilities through the acceleration of what is the most petty forms of conflict resulting in the accidental expansion of control insofar as the conflicts you are excited about are rendered completely governable. As such, your recommendations are a form of counter-insurgency masquerading as something else.

"Your inability to see how panic freezes a riot by making people thirsty for order and peace"

plz don't generalize

Generalizing about the world around is how human life, and all mammalian life, has come into existence (pattern recognition etc).

Your liberal pluralistic please are a form of individuation.
Yes, we can analyze trends through our experience and make decisions based on that information.
Yes, it will not always be correct.


i dont believe you

Add new comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
Subscribe to Comments for "Anti-Eviction Riots in Barcelona"