Claim of Expropriation in Defense of Street Counter-Culture

  • Posted on: 15 March 2018
  • By: thecollective

via pudget sound anarchists

TL:DR we stole a bunch of shit from a corporate store that was clowning hip-hop and selling streetwear inspired clothes cause we hate that shit and cause we hate capitalism and cause want to keep the streets criminal, go team anarchy!

Something made our blood-boil. That’s not unusual. There’s a Columbia outdoor clothing store in downtown Seattle which currently has a window display that reads “Straight out of Portland” with some hip militant-looking streetwear behind it. Now, graffiti artists like Kidult who tag up fancy shops that have “graffiti” designs on their clothes etc, we hate seeing “street” culture commodified and pacified – especially by the very same capitalists who are helping crack down on lived street culture and especially by a bunch of rich white men who continue the colonial looting of non-white resources. To commodify anything is disgusting and to rip the criminality and conflictuality out of streetwear is not only a bad move aesthetically/effectively, but also an attempt to neutralize something that is a threat to the ruling order. Of course not all of “street” culture is desirable and not all criminals are our friends, but if there is a criminal class true anarchists most certainly are of it. And we certainly aspire to be true anarchists which is to say true criminals.

That which fundamentally comes in conflict with the ruling order is deemed criminal by the ruling order. This is the sense in which we are criminal. Not all legally criminal actions are desirable and not all legally non-criminal actions are undesirable, but at this point in time to maximize potential means to operate in the criminal realm. Being on a criminal – dare we say Illegalist – bent we decided to fight back against the recuperation/co-optation of street culture and get some loot in the process. We’ve seen what happened to rock and roll and while it’s impossible to completely prevent co-optation we can curb it and use it to our advantage. Feeling inspired we decided to embark on a campaign of expropriation;

we decided to loot back.

We managed to steal a hell of a lot of clothing using a layered foil lined bag to block the security devices on the clothes from tripping the alarm at the door, some situational awareness, sub-par acting skills, and the will to act. When we took our loot home we looked up on youtube how to remove the security device from the clothes which was hilariously easy. And then we sold most the goods on sliding scale to skate-rats which means cheap or free to broke comrades and half retail price to rich kids. We’re saying all this, because we’ve gone over the pros and cons and think that sharing a little information will help these tactics spread where desirable or better inspire people in other areas. We’ve been careful not to share too much though;

loose-lips sink ships.

Remember, shoplifting is a risky thing. It usually pays off if you’re good at it, but it’s largely about luck. The stores want to make you feel as if someone is always watching and that alone is usually their main method of control, that is to say people self-policing themselves is what prevents most shoplifting not actual security guard intervention or whatever. This only goes so far, if you don’t want attention don’t draw attention. If you look like your looking around constantly to see if someone’s watching, concealing your face on purpose, or a pack of teenagers this may not be a good strategy if you’re trying to go unnoticed. If you’re flash mobbing in and grabbing whatever you can and dipping then you probably should think more about getting away while having all eyes on you, what you look like, or whatever than just trying to look like a normie in the store.

Another part of shop lifting is knowing your target, knowing yourself, knowing your environment, and knowing your enemy.

  • What are you going in for?
  • What’s worth the risk?
  • Will you look suspicious? Will you keep cool under pressure?
  • Do you shop here regularly and if so will they recognize you if you come back?
  • What security measures are in place?
  • Does what you’re grabbing have a security device on it that will trip the alarm?
  • What security people do they have?
  • Will they fight you?
  • Will they chase you?
  • Will they beat you up and leave you?
  • How many cameras are there?
  • How many are probably actually being watched?
  • Where are the cameras?
  • What behavior looks sketchy?
  • Can I use guilt or the race-card to worm my way out if I get caught?
  • Do the workers actually care if you’re stealing?

Just like at other direct actions where you may be on film, breaking continuity is key. It’s harder when shoplifting stealthily due to the fact you can’t walk around in all black with a mask without drawing undue attention, but you can wear a wig and sunglasses or a baseball cap. You can shave your beard for the occasion. You can wear clothes you will never wear again. This is a little extra, but some of us like to wear an outfit to bus downtown then change into another do some shopping then change back into the bus outfit once we’re a good ways away then bus back just to break continuity further.

Stealing from capitalist stores is totally chill. Property is made-up, but also the capitalist class loots the planet, steals worker’s potential, exploits the poor, and is largely responsible for the hell-scape of condos and social-death plaguing Seattle, not to mention the horrible things these corporations are doing to the global south and the daily violence of the poverty they enforce. If by stealing from them we can help support our insurgent projects and deal damage to them it’s a win-win. We’d like to be autonomous from them and not even rely on stealing from the owning class, but at this point in history we can have Nikes on our feet and a brick in our hand and rightly say we’re doing everything in our power to effectively and desirably fight back and build autonomy while looking cool as hell and not being complicit.

Hooligans are the ones who popularized a lot of the streetwear and a lot of them got their clothes by stealing them from fancy shops and though many were not acting according to a critically analyzed ethics we still place ourselves in this continuum. To us that which is produced by capitalism can be expropriated and used to actualize our desires. To us looting and shoplifting are attacks on the commodity-form for itself.

Though we did sell most of what we stole, and it may seem contradictory for anticapitalists to do such a thing, this is a means to an end for us; sadly we live under capitalism and capital is the most flexible material resource in this age so like pirates and anarchists before us we use money for subversive ends. Though there are comrades in Greece who rob stores only to distribute the goods and burn the money.

On top of obtaining resources, stealing brings us face to face with the actually existing infrastructure of class-society and property which are things like self-policing, the threat of brutalization by the justice system, security systems, and all those sorts of things. In these struggles we are reminded that law is authoritarian-control and arbitrary morality and stagnation in favor of the ruling order. We are reminded that justice was invented to settle disputes among the rich and justify whomever controlled the state and is our enemy. We are reminded that stocked shelves are guarded from the starving and empty homes are guarded from the homeless.

Petty acts of resistance also help us not crumble under the psychic weight of the everyday brutality of the ruling order. Also, distributing the loot to insurgent and mutual aid projects reminds us that hope to live the, “from each according to ability to each based on need,” dream known as communism. What we mean by communism here is not Stalinism or any other authoritarian state-socialism, but rather the coming together of comrades who hold all material things in common that is to say who share everything. We want to use resources to meet needs and build projects and property relations, markets, and things like this only get in the way.

Fundamentally we can only speak for ourselves in saying that in this criminal path we are also, fundamentally, nihilists. We hold faith in nothing and reject morality, but that doesn’t mean we don’t have ethics. To us there is a difference between those two things. Morality being largely faith-based or handed down by mass-society and ethics being a critically forged theory and practice of how it is most desirable or “good” to act in what we perceive as the world. And we have also found ourselves to be, again, anarchists who reject reformism, liberalism, conservatism, statecraft, capitalism, and all other projects that hope to dominate living beings.

In our anarchic criminality we want to do away with the barrier between living and fighting. We are fighting to try to build capacity to overthrow the state and capitalism, but also to meet needs and take our lives away from the subjugation of work which, though being desirable in and of themselves, also increases our capacities.

We’ve found that moving towards communist anarchy is most desirable. Living communism and spreading anarchy has the most potential to make our dreams real and, to us, is best for living better in the immediate. We’ve also found that the criminal element is a key part of maximizing what we can do and what we get out of this trajectory. However this does not mean we look down on anyone who decides not to steal from a store or who has affinity for more anti-social anarchist trajectories. We in fact have much love for the individuals who are wary of “communism” or any overly-collective project or don’t think the rev is possible at all and just want to be weekend nihilist artists who attack what is ugly. We’re also chill with those who are down as hell, but are not in a place where stealing petty goods is a wise choice. If you feel more comfortable suing cops or getting money from the state or capitalists in some other above the board way than more power to you as long as your projects as a whole are still fundamentally conflicting with the ruling order.

Cheers to the duo who pulled off that diamond store smash and grab in Northgate, that was some Pink Panthers-ass action. Very inspiring! Hope y’all are still free and know what to do with those rocks.

Make anarchy the last crime.

See you in the streets.

~The Black Iguana Cell of the International Anarchist Insurgency

[Technical notes for the curious reader: We submitted this communique using the Tor Browser on the TAILS operating system on a public network. We ran this text and some of our previous texts through the program Anonymouth to try to catch any unknown patterns in our writing that could give us away.]

category: 

Comments

it's trip to a read a thing about taking back "street counter-culture" and not seeing any mention of how most of what gets sold in stores is actually an appropriation of Black street culture. well, PNW.

Anyone who critiques you for selling shit you stole is yuppie scum who knows nothing of poverty.

I went into an a communist bookstore and asked for a copy of "Steal This Book", and they escorted me to the door, insisting they were fresh out.

not since the late 00s has such a lengthy communique been written about a minor act of petty crime
reminds me of the one about smashing some poor dope's laptop, although that one was actually pretty distasteful. this is just kinda funny

"Save on Meat" billboard taken hostage, never forget!

Pretty sure that old laptop smashing story was a totally made-up joke/satire communique though.

I remember there was one communique years ago about physically attacking random yuppies, pretty sure that was a spoof. A good one.

But Yea this is a trip down memory lane, mid 2000s, but with less nihilism, more strugglismo in the communique. Funny how this happens.

i hope it was a joke but i don't recall it striking me that way....i used to know some really angry people who i wouldn't have put it past. made me sad.

Good to know aboiut Anonymouth, but please.... Tails is unsafe as fuck unless you use it as a VM. SystemD is one fucking huge security flaw that most of the GNU/Linux systems developpers fell asleep over.

There is no evidence to back this up. Suspicion of SystemD is baseless conspiracy theory which is not backed up by any of the very technically knowledgeable radical people I know, including ones who work professionally and personally on building linux operating systems. They weren't "gotten to", there just is nothing nefarious to hide here.

Beyond the shallow "conspiracy theory" one-fits-all logic fallacy, for the readers actually interested in knowing how problematic SystemD is, especially for usurping control over their own machines, here's a good, concise compendium of the many issues involved with it:

https://suckless.org/sucks/systemd

So basically this makes Tails just as safe as Windows if used on hardware, instead of virtual machine. Because basically that is a subsystem which hijacks your Linux OS at bootup, then takes control of all the functions that could help anynonimyzing you or protecting your saved personal data.

@ Fri, 03/16/2018 - 09:47, there is a difference between claiming something is a piece of shit vs something that is inherently insecure. Your links makes the former claim of systemd being a piece of shit and that's about it lol.

When the subsystem controlling your system's base routines and hardware is shit, that means something equally insecure on the onset. What is not shit: the GNU principle of being in control of your machine.

So just avoid it, and that solves the problem. There's other init systems that are not shit out there, and aren't taking over your computer.

I'm sorry you failed to show the insecurities of systemd as claimed. That should've been a simple thing, but you failed. ha ha. Linking to why some linux distro shouldn't use systemd has jack diarrhea to do with security.

systemd is a buggy pos. the dude has to go and find bugs for you you to prove this? no. lol. go and find them yourself if you want proof, wtf....

Remember when pottering won a pwnie for systemd? remember how those bugs where handled? https://linux.slashdot.org/story/17/07/29/1647255/systemd-named-lamest-v...

you are a fool that has little clue in what they are talking about.

Basically, systemd's doing a bunch of highly suspicious routines at root level that users don't ask for, and is also blocking user control over the system. Anyone bevlieving it's a good idea to use such a Gruyere cheese of a subsystem, that leaves so many obvious openings to MITM attacks and other exploits is either misinformed or a likely NSA shill.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemd#Availability

Small minority of linux distros not adopting Systemd.

There's actually a seizable community of SystemD resisters in Arch.

Oooooh look what those horrible capitalists did to the punk culture, all those anorexic models mincing on the catwalks in mink ermines and denim jeans splashed with bleach and slashed with boxcutters.

It's quite amusing to me that the author of that article links to an article with a pay wall.

Attention East Coast & New York City people reading this:

Instead of trivial, self-indulgent, easily ignored stuff, draw some negative attention to this event instead...

Presented by Tina Brown, touted as 'Women in the World Summit,' and taking place April 12 to 14, at -- appropriately enough -- the David H. Kock Theatre at Lincoln Center, this event features Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski, an energetic champion of the fossil fuel industry and of recent Trump Administration efforts to open Alaska's National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling.

More on this contribution to the galloping ecological crisis can be found here:

http://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/366568-alaskas-arctic-nati...

Other headliners include relentless war enthusiast and friend of plutocrats Hillary Clinton, the CEO of the global mobile sweatshop Uber, and dancer Misty Copeland -- "Dance to the beat of eight billion dead..." or something like that...

It's women in leadership roles so that's fiiine. Anyone protesting this has gotta be a MAGA Trump supporter. Oh wait...

Yeah, that's how the ambiguity of the Idpol policy creates an environment of impotence, whereby the so-called democratic choice of the people is rechannelled and diverted into feelgood public relation hype disguising totalitarian rhetoric.

Add new comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
Human?
2
s
P
F
k
D
p
Enter the code without spaces.