General Discussion

63 posts / 0 new
Last post
anon (not verified)
not at all. relations are

not at all. relations are all there are. the relations that make up earth, the universe are not governed by the human mind.

the model of reality is not reality. separations are merely conceptual. how many notions don’t exist outside of the human mind?

being non-ideological allows room back in for intuition, and ‘reading signals from the outside,’ from the living space all creatures share and is the PRIMARY organizing influence of life on this planet. our language stucture orients our beliefs away from treating space as more than a non-actor, non-participant in orchestrating, actualizing, and sustaining life (a continuum without beginning or ending) as an ongoing process we are situated within. the inhabitants and the habitat make up one dynamic.

what’s allowed to come into play without ideology is ‘and/both’ thinking, or ‘the logic of the inclusional third,’ taken over ‘either/or’ thinking. ‘either/or’ thinking leaves out negative causality. one can believe in capitalism, and endless growth as the head of a lumber company. BUT, nothing grew. what was once a forest has been transformed into bald earth. aka, there are externalities to every ideology. every single one.

anon (not verified)
wordy

wordy

see, i like “non-ideological” but fear that it might be a mere pretension of being “above the noise”

i like some of what you’re saying and it kinda makes sense

but my paranoid spidey sense kinda feels the trace of a scent, an aura on the UV spectrum that colors your words with traces of philosophical and ideological precepts.

not that that’s a big bad no-no that you must purify yourself from. precisely the point is that we can try to be clear-headed and not delusional, none of us are exempt or invulnerable to bullshit

anon (not verified)
I think you mean emiley.

I think you mean emiley.

anon (not verified)
Ok emile, come out from

Ok emile, come out from behind the curtains, there is always subjective reality.

daydreamdays
I don't really mean that by

I don't really mean that by it, but, I ultimately can't quite express what I do mean by "non-ideological". I do agree with the general sentiment of what you're saying, though.

anon (not verified)
you know, i meant to say “i

you know, i meant to say “i don’t like feeling swept...”
but the meaning of the version with the omission still makes sense in relation to what was being said above it.

see, i might not like feeling helpless to things beyond my control, but it’s happening all the time

daydreamdays
I see what you mean. I did

I see what you mean. I did mean to imply that such notions pose a danger concerning agency. I'm still a little enchanted by collecitve euphoria, though. As much as I would be critical, I still kind of like that people can somehow come together to create a better world. Idrk what I'm really on about beyond that tbh.

daydreamdays
Has anyone ever seen the film

Has anyone ever seen the film, La Jetée?

anon (not verified)
i did once, lol why?

i did once, lol why?

daydreamdays
I was just curious.

I was just curious.

anon (not verified)
Is that the arty-farty French

Is that the arty-farty French porn movie with jets of you know what?

anon (not verified)
That's right... The official

That's right... The official cut is only a bit more than 20 minutes while in fact it was an hour and a half of hairy, gnarly '60s porn with suspicious fetish like scat and other devious shit.

Pages

Add new comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
%
v
h
5
D
e
Enter the code without spaces.