Kafa on Modern Warfare in Ukraine

From Live Like the World is Dying

LISTEN HERE: https://live-like-the-world-is-dying.pinecast.co/episode/1e9a9c8c/kafa-on-modern-warfare-in-ukraine

Episode Summary

This week on Live Like the World is Dying, Margaret talks with Kafa (they/she), a Ukrainian anarchist fighter and NB from Crimea who is currently resisting Russian occupation, and has been since they were born. They talk about what the shape of modern warfare is like, what it’s like to live under occupation, and what it’s like to be an anarchist fighter in a larger State military formation.

Host Info

Margaret can be found on instagram at @margaretkilljoy. You can find more of her essays on Substack at: margaretkilljoy.substack.com

Publisher Info

This show is published by Strangers in A Tangled Wilderness. We can be found at www.tangledwilderness.org, or on Twitter @TangledWild and Instagram @Tangled_Wilderness and Blue Sky @tangledwilderness.bsky.social You can support the show on Patreon at www.patreon.com/strangersinatangledwilderness.

Find out more at https://live-like-the-world-is-dying.pinecast.co

This podcast is powered by Pinecast. Try Pinecast for free, forever, no credit card required. If you decide to upgrade, use coupon code r-69f62d for 40% off for 4 months, and support Live Like the World is Dying.

 

Transcript

Speaker A:

Hello and welcome to Live like the World Is Dying, your podcast for what feels like the end times. I'm your host today, Margaret Killjoy. And today it is a an interview I have been really excited to do for a long time now. I hope that you all get a lot out of it. I can't even tell you what you're going to get out of it because I haven't done it yet, because I don't record these at the end. I record these at the beginning because why would I record them at the end when I would know what I'm supposed to be talking about? That doesn't make any sense. Anyway, it's a podcast about war and conflict and the way things sometimes go. But we are a proud member of the Channel Zero network of anarchist podcasts. And here's a jingle from another show on the network. The Final straw is a weekly anarchist radio show. It's fucking awesome. And you're never gonna hear me say fucking awesome on our show because we're FCC regulated. There's a black part of my heart that. That just flutters when you, when you talk like that talk.

Speaker B:

Then more yelling.

Speaker A:

It's a weird sort of, like, thing

Speaker B:

in a way, but also can get kind of crushing at times.

Speaker A:

Thefinalstrawradio.noblogs.org. And we're back. Okay, so if you could introduce yourself with your name, your pronouns, and maybe like, roughly where you live and what you're up to these days.

Speaker B:

Hello, everyone. My call sign is Kafa. I use they, she pronouns. And I'm an anarchist, a Ukrainian fighter, a drone operator, and a proud Enby. I was born in Crimea in the early 2000s, and that soul fact somehow started a lot of things in my life, and that ended up being one of the most important things that influenced me later on. I witnessed the Russian occupation when I was a teenager, and a series of events made me realize that I'm both a queer, an anarchist, and someone who doesn't believe in a dictatorship. So that's why I decided to join Ukrainian armed forces when the big war has started. And I guess that's why I'm here.

Speaker A:

Yeah, there's a lot of stuff I want to talk to you about. I want to talk about what's going on over there, but I also kind of want to ask you a lot of questions just about what war in general is like now, because I think it looks very different from what all the movies that I grew up watching looked like, where it's, you know, people with, well, Helmets and guns. Those are still probably part of it. But I guess before we even talk about that, I would like to talk a little bit more about, if you're comfortable with it, like, how did you become an anarchist?

Speaker B:

I like to answer that question in that way that being born into such a sunny, free, beautiful Ukrainian scenery next to the sea as Crimea is, I was not really given a choice to be free myself. Right. I got involved into queer and artisty stuff when I was a teenager. And then later on, after being forcibly displaced and moving to Kyiv, I got involved in the underground anarchy scene and the grassroots movement. And that's why it was very feminist, very trans feminist as well. And it kind of decided the course of my life. The kind of books I was reading, kind of people I was hanging out with were underdogs and punks. So, yeah, that's. That's why that makes sense.

Speaker A:

I want to ask a little bit about what the Russian occupation was like. It. You said it displaced you. One of the reasons I want to ask that is because I think the Tanki propaganda is really strong on the left in America. I don't know if you were aware of this, but I. I'm being sarcastic. You are. Have to deal with this all the time. There is a portion of the left that is convinced that Russia in all of its glory is somehow the same as the ussr, and also that the USSR was good. And there's a lot of propaganda that specifically seeks to kind of muddy the waters, that tries to sort of paint a like, samey samey. You know, Ukraine and Russia are both just modern capitalist nations, so why would we care at all? But it seems like you describe it as the Russian occupation, not like the Russian liberation of Crimea. What was that like?

Speaker B:

So I was a young teenager back then, and I just recently at that time discovered that I like other people that are the same gender as me, and I like weird queer stuff and I don't really feel like a girl whatnot. So all this somehow was at the same time as Crimea was getting occupied. And later, for a year, me and my family lived under occupation, which actually was not as gay as the tankies want to believe, I guess, because a lot of people got imprisoned. A lot of people were captured on the street for their beliefs. A lot of people were forced to move. The ones that actually were involved into any kind of political activities. People that were doing transgressive art as well were forced to move. For instance, I was attending kind of like a theater class after school, and the class got suspended. Because the people that were doing the class didn't really fit into the narrative of what Russia wanted to paint. So they actually, the whole propaganda, the whole political work started from changing the schools and the education system. That's what they were starting with. That was the aim, to kind of brainwash the children, because the children, as we now can see, were to become the soldiers. And they did accomplish that, as a matter of fact. So, yeah, it was not. Not a great experience, to be honest. And the kind of vibe that Crimea had before the occupation of a free, liberated, sexually emancipated place where the hippies and the outcasts would go to party and to dance and to listen to jazz and swim naked in the sea, that stopped immediately. That was not a thing anymore. Because this is not what you do under imperialist regime.

Speaker A:

I guess I'm under the impression that everyone all over the world is forced to pay attention to American politics. And so. And I kind of feel bad because I'm specifically interviewing you because I think that you have a lot of lessons that could be useful to an American audience and to folks who are not currently dealing with the situation that you're in. But I, From. From outside, from when I look at this stuff, and the more I try and read about Putin and resistance to Putin within Russia. It's been a while, but I used to know some Russian anarchists during the, you know, 2010s who were struggling with it then that it seems like Putin's Russia is the. The closest parallel to what Trump's America is trying to become and do this stuff that you're talking about, like, you know, this kind of sexually liberated, you know, queer friendly society or increasingly queer friendly society, and then just like this immediate switch flipped to try and force into totalitarianism, does that. Am I just doing that like Americans see themselves in everything, or does that seem like a reasonable thing to say?

Speaker B:

To be honest, I think it is quite a reasonable thing to say because America is also descending into fascism in quite a biblical sense. But there are definitely some differences, I think, because in America, or maybe this is just my perspective, but I truly believe in the good of American people and in their guns as well.

Speaker A:

So

Speaker B:

I think a brighter future is possible. It's just a matter of how you handle this power within you.

Speaker A:

That makes sense to me. One of the things that I think about a lot, I read history books for a living, and I read about all of these groups. And whenever there's a revolution or a resistance movement or whatever, step one is always where the fuck are we going to get small arms? Like, where the fuck are we going to get rifles? You know? And America, if it ever has to do anything like that, is skipping that step. We have the guns for both good and bad already here.

Speaker B:

Yes, exactly. All good starts with the spirit and a rifle.

Speaker A:

So. Okay. To kind of get the. Okay. The other question that I think a lot of people listening to this might have and that I would love your take on. You know, you're an anarchist, but you're in a state military. What is that like? What drove you to that decision? How do you feel about it?

Speaker B:

That's my favorite question, to be honest. I love this.

Speaker A:

I don't know if that's sarcasm or not.

Speaker B:

I don't think I know even. I think there is no contradiction here. I'm not fighting for the state. I'm fighting for things I believe in. And I truly do believe in them because I'm here because I'm ready to do whatever is necessary to do. And I have seen people do that. And my friends have died for the things that they also believe in, which are freedom, which are human rights, which are the fact that people don't want to be Russia. People don't want to die under occupation. And this also is very important. I don't want another Ukrainian family to be going through what people are going through in occupation and what I had to go through. So, yeah, yeah. So I don't think it is somehow bad to be in the state military because people that are here are of very different beliefs and as well, if we are to do something later, right. We cannot lose this political opportunity because the neo Nazis, when the war is won, right. When we are done with this, are going to come and ask, oh, sorry, what were you doing when I was fighting on the front line? And are we as anti fascists to answer? Oh, sorry, I was selling donors in Berlin.

Speaker A:

No fucking way.

Speaker B:

I'm sorry. Like if you call yourself an anarchist or an anti fascist and you do not participate in this act of civil resistance as defeating Russia is by definition, then I don't have anything to talk with you about. This is my true belief that actually, and this is quite a hard pill to swallow and bone to pick with others because they start talking about personal choice and about, I don't know, individualism. Sorry, I don't really understand that. I don't really think this is a way to move forward as a society, as a community, because some things needs to be done for a good of others. There is a necessary sacrifice to be made. And yeah, that's, that's my opinion.

Speaker A:

No, it's, it's, it's interesting to me because to me it seems so obvious that it, if someone invades and is like killing families and villages and you know, if you have an occupying fascistic force. Right. It seems so obvious that the anarchist choice is to fight that and to fight that in the, the most vigorous way that is available and the most effective way that is available. And it's like, it's confusing to me because I, when I think about individual choice with this, it mostly just seems like, okay, you could individually choose to be a coward, I guess, not do all of the stuff that we say we believe in, like solidarity and fighting fascism, you know, like. But I'm going to think a lot less of this is really easy for me to say. I'm literally in an armchair inside the United States, you know, I, but I, I know that for me, when the invasion first happened, I just did the thing that I try to do anytime something's happening. That's not where I live, which is I just look to see what the anarchists there do and believe because there's anarchists all over the world. In any given conflict, you find the anarchists and you say, all right, what are they up to? And it seems like from outside that most of the anarchists in Ukraine were like, yeah, we support taking up arms and trying to drive out this invading force.

Speaker B:

Yes, that's exactly what happened. And that is also a part of why I did this choice. When the full scale invasion started, I was, as a matter of fact, in Berlin and I was involved in resistance there. And as the days were starting to roll in, right, the first day, the second day, my friends started joining the territorial defense. So to protect the capital, right. Most of them were living in Kyiv at the time. I didn't know if they're going to survive until the end of the week. And then people, I mean, some people, I got some support, right. But others once with different kind of views had the nerve to say something like, oh, there is no need to resist, you're going to surrender soon. Like, just, it's not worth the hustle. And I was like, no, this is just not happening. Sorry. Yeah. So pretty quickly I realized that there's no good there and the only real thing that one can ever do is fight with a rifle in your hands. So that's what I did. I guess I took my time to prepare. I also had to figure out some bureaucracy in Germany and I, in half a year I came back and very soon joined 93rd Mechanized Infantry Brigade. And that's how my way as a drone operator started. Pretty quickly it got messy. It was winter of 2023 and it was the Battle of Bakhmut. And as for me at the time as well, for a very young person, it was quite a tragic. And it was my first deployment to see people that you yesterday had a coffee with Dai. But things like that, actually, the more you experience them, the more you teach yourself to be strong about it. That might sound absolutely ridiculous to some, but at my duty, right, I have to do my job. I cannot really cry. I cannot really show any emotion per se when I'm talking to the radio because people on the other side of the screen are also on duty. They are doing something that needs to be done. You have to finish a task. You have to continue doing your job. And this is an acquired skill. It doesn't really come to you instantly. And as well, at the time, I was lucky to have people that already had experience, that were prior fighters that joined the army before 2022, and they were there to teach me how to be with this and how to not get this. Kill you eventually.

Speaker A:

No, that makes sense to me. I again, I read a lot of history and I look at people and I'm just like, oh, other people have dealt with so much, you know, and I wonder how they do it. Like, is it. In my own life, there is a distinct before and after the time. I, like, I've only seen one person who was dead from gun violence. And there is a before and an after for that event for me, you know, it was a transformative, traumatic experience in my life. And. Yeah. Does it just get easier?

Speaker B:

I would say so. I don't know. I just for the context, maybe some listeners don't really understand what's up. So a drone operator has to see a lot of people that are dead, actively dying or going to die, or has been dead for a very long time. So there's quite some gore going on. And somehow it does get easier because you just get so desensitized by this that it is another. Another day, you know. But at the same time, some events you memorize more than the others. I don't know. Sometimes people are looking directly into the camera, like into the, I don't know, the eye of the storm. Well, some of them are actually our own troops trying to like, show that they're wounded or like you are showing the way for the troops or you're just assessing the sit situations of the command knows what's up. So it really depends. But some of those things I would rather forget, to be honest. Yeah, but that's fine. That's what the therapy is for, so that's okay.

Speaker A:

Well, that's what I was. That's actually. That was literally going to be. My next question is, like, what are some of the tools that you use? Like, do you use therapy?

Speaker B:

Yes. But what actually does help me is creating art. I write poetry. I have been writing poetry for my whole life. And I also wrote a small autobiographic novel. I'm trying to scoop it all together into some kind of an issue. It is very messy as publishing can be, but this is the only way to deal with such intense emotions to. Because especially last year of my service was very, very challenging and a lot of my friends died defending Ukraine. So in order for these feelings to not completely numb me to my core, I have to put them out there.

Speaker A:

Yeah, yeah.

Speaker B:

It's not actually a great choice maybe for hypersensitive person to have a position like this, but this is what we're working with. So. Yeah, I just write and I write and I write, and that helps.

Speaker A:

I mean. Okay. And then just to stay in this, like, sometimes darker topics are not always really dark to me because I take a lot of strength out of remembering that I'm going to die. And I take a lot of strength out of. Out of knowing that I only have a little bit of choice in the way that I die. Like, I have some agency in that, but I don't have complete agency of that. And so how do you deal with the level of danger that you're in? How do you deal with fear? And I'm asking this just both, you know, personally and out of curiosity, but also because I think that. I think that a lot of the stuff that you've learned might be really useful. I think that there's a lot of listeners who are not used to hearing from soldiers that they can identify with, like, socially, gender wise, politically, you know.

Speaker B:

Yeah, sure. So for myself, the answer is I honestly do not care that much. Like, for me, I am more worried for my brothers and sisters in arms, for example, when we're doing a mission together, that they would get injured and then it would be my responsibility to help them in a particular order to, like, make sure they gonna be fine, all this march protocol whatnot. Because it is also quite a big responsibility.

Speaker A:

No, that makes sense to me. That. That way of dealing with it. You are literally wearing a shirt with a skull and crossbones on it right now.

Speaker B:

Yeah, that's San Paoli. So.

Speaker A:

Yeah, okay, fair enough. That's a, that's a football team for. Right, that's the anti fascist football team from Hamburg. Okay. I am, I learned about them when I lived in the Netherlands. That was what everyone was excited about. Yeah, the anarchists of my generation tended to be like non sports people. And so the European anarchists would be like, what's wrong with you all? Why don't you follow football?

Speaker B:

Yeah, they are pretty hardcore actually in Ukraine that's also a thing. A lot of like army boys nowadays, AKA the old generation of anarchists are from the football hooligan saying like Kaifariki boys or some other people that are as well. Anarchists in the resistance committee are football. Football people.

Speaker A:

What is the like anarchist organizing within the ranks? What does that look like? Like how, how lefty is the military? Obviously you know, there's the famous more right wing components of it, but like. And how much is there any autonomous organizing? I know at the beginning of the war there was like a little bit more actively autonomous organizing before everything was kind of taken up by the larger Ukrainian military structure.

Speaker B:

Yes, that's correct. Now the only kind of quote unquote official non state military organizing are the volunteer groups that are doing their own thing, like Ukrainska Dubrovalsha Armia. Ukrainian Volunteer army is an organization that you don't have to be like a soldier to join, but you are a fighter. And on the other hand there is the official apparatus of the military forces that looks rigid, but in reality it is quite often pure chaos. And in the cracks of the chaos there is us. It's honestly just a bunch of different people that are trying to make their own smaller units, be that company, a platoon, a squad, any size element, to be more bearable, democratic and self organized. So for example, in my unit we had this thing where we would vote new people in, we would have particular rules and we would have plenums. Well, something very, very similar to plenums. Think German colleagues would familiar with this term. They really love that.

Speaker A:

So it's like some kind of council?

Speaker B:

Yeah, yeah, it's like a council and then everyone talks and you can't really interrupt them and then you like come to a conclusion of some sorts in a really, really long time. So that's

Speaker A:

democracy. Yep, yeah, exactly.

Speaker B:

I honestly it is quite a fun question to me in a way that every unit is different. If you would ask one of my friends that was serving in the unit where David Chichkan Was serving. Right. David Chan, being a Ukrainian artist, a painter and the mural painter. Yeah, well, he did a lot of different art. He.

Speaker A:

Yeah, the mural paint. I'm just thinking, if I'm thinking of

Speaker B:

the right person, he had very, very particular style. He is quite iconic, I would say. Yeah. So anyhow, if you'd ask that person, Right. They had different style of organizing because everyone has their own approach. But in the end, everyone is somehow connected in this net of contacts. Right. Even if they are in a different unit and different people help each other. And there's also grassroots organizations like solidarity collectives that are used in time of need are also used for networking and create this safety net for people. Because in the end, there are a lot of situations that you can end up in that are quite peculiar. Like when you are in a hospital after you get wounded, or you have a health issue, or you don't have anywhere to live because your house was taken by Russia and now you need to sort that out as well. And you have this service to take care of. So there's many, many ordinary life situations that you also have to sort out. When you are in the military, too, contrary to the popular belief, army doesn't really take care of you completely, as someone in a kindergarten does.

Speaker A:

That actually, that, I feel like, kind of explains a lot. I think that the American conception of the military is like the single most structured and hierarchical force that one could possibly be involved in. Right. And I wonder whether the reason that militaries, well, they believe in hierarchy, so that's a big part of it. But I wonder if part of the reason that they put forward that idea is because war is like the most chaotic place you could imagine where, like, people are acting of their own initiative constantly. And so it seems like the Ukrainian military is not. It doesn't look like, what if America was at war in Ukraine versus Russia? It would look very different, right?

Speaker B:

100%. I think America would also not have great success in this.

Speaker A:

I'm sorry, but you can talk shit on America.

Speaker B:

I mean, I have a lot of American friends. They're going to get upset, but I don't think they're going to listen to this podcast. The truth is actually that what reformed the Ukrainian army and made it an army of the next generation is people, people like me and my friends who were just led by this tireless motivation of protecting what is dear to them and came to join the ranks in 2022, and with their sole force of this belief in good and their own civilian experiences, completely changed the Pat of how things are made and brought so much intellectual, creative new concepts into this rigid Soviet old stinky system.

Speaker A:

No, that makes sense because one of the things, I mean, actually, you know, we're more than half an hour in and we haven't gotten to them. The main question I wanted to ask you about, but because it seems like the Ukraine Russian war is often looked at from the outside as the most modern war that is happening because it is like peer or near peer groups fighting. Obviously the Iran war looks completely different. The American Iran war looks completely different than the Russian Ukrainian war. But I wanted to have you on because I wanted to talk about and kind of hear about what modern war actually looks like. Because I think it's a different set of skills than people might. And one of the reasons I want to do that bluntly is that America has been kind of will we, won't we about falling apart entirely over the past couple of years. And right now it's leaning towards won't we? It's leaning towards the for better or worse, it's going to stumble forward and not entirely collapse, but we'll see. But you know, people are worried about civil war and people are wondering what the next war looks like. And it seems like what you all have going on with like not just drones, but automated resupply robots and fiber optic drones. But also everyone has to dig tunnels to avoid all of the drones. And that some of the war is fought with what a, like a gamepad,

Speaker B:

like a Steam deck sometimes.

Speaker A:

Oh, I said, I said a gamepad.

Speaker B:

Yeah. Xbox joystick. It depends.

Speaker A:

Yeah, okay, yeah, that is your primary weapon of war is an Xbox joystick.

Speaker B:

It depends on kind of system you're operating.

Speaker A:

Okay, but, but so what does that like look like? What is the difference between that and a war 10 years ago? What do we have to look forward to?

Speaker B:

I think it's important to highlight that if something of this scale happens in America, it also might look different and the Civil war would not have the same features as full scale war in Ukraine. But I think what needs to be every civilian's toolkit, if we are talking about skills, is the following. First of all, everyone needs to know how to do medical stuff. I'm not a medic, but I'm a soldier and I know how to do march. I, for example, would not converse a tourniquet because that's a medic's job. But something basic like cls. March is a medical protocol that is used to treat a casualty on the front line. So it is not Implemented in the red zone. But okay, let's say not directly on the battlefield, but somewhere in the safety. You assess the casualty, you check the massive hemorrhages, you check the airways, all this stuff. So it's like a protocol that is used to make someone stop dying, I guess.

Speaker A:

So you all are stuck using the English acronym for this.

Speaker B:

Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. That's very. Okay, yeah.

Speaker A:

Massive hemorrhaging airways.

Speaker B:

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Speaker A:

I actually, I've learned this before, but I can't remember the rest of it.

Speaker B:

Yeah, well, I guess every American needs to do that now if they want to prepare for war or whatnot. That doesn't sound very good when you say it, but prepare for. For a critical situation. Let's call it this way. Right. It's easier to stomach. So it's also a good skill to be in a good physical shape. I know it's not the case for a lot of people and I might get bad karma for saying this. I know that not everyone can be very fit, but at the same time, you can take care of some chronic illnesses that you have to not, you know, have them in a very critical state. Like have a full pill pack of your, I don't know, Zoloft that you're taking. Okay. There's not going to be a pharmacy for a little bit as it was not for the first couple of weeks during the full scale invasion. Right. So this is something to think about. One has to be thoughtful about that as well. It's good to have a bug out bag, but this is also optional. It depends on how things are gonna be a lot of. Yeah, it depends on relief, on the terrain, where you're in and on a lot of factors. Right. If you have children. If you don't have children. I don't know. I don't have children, so I don't have to worry about that. I have two cats. But yeah, as well, I. From the top of my head, I think also a very good skill is to dig, to learn how to make a proper kind of little foxhole for yourself. But this is when you think about it, like now I'm saying to a civilian person, go to your backyard in the United States of America and dig a foxhole. That sounds quite ridiculous, but this is real. Like, I don't know. I think also when you're like planning a house, let's say you're building a house in America, that's not really realistic, is it? But it's also good to include a basement because basement is essential when you are Hiding from bombs.

Speaker A:

Okay. So it's like not even. You don't have to necessarily build a whole bunker, but just actually making sure you have a basement to get.

Speaker B:

Oh yeah, 100% in the basement. You can survive virtually anything in. Well there. There are some experiences attuned to that. And as well as it doesn't have to be super like fallout vibe, you know, it just can be a cover and it would lesser your chances of dying from an aerial bomb threefold. Yeah, yeah. So that. That is something that one has to keep in mind when prepar or something like this. Also it is important to keep things real. Like if you gonna go into a full blown psychosis about this war situation, that's not gonna help anyone. So. Yeah, I also have quite strong opinions on this whole mesh radio situation. Ew. EW is expensive. I mean if you really are a nerd, you can get this mesh radio thing.

Speaker A:

But I don't know about the w. I know about the mesh radio thing.

Speaker B:

So. EW is electronic warfare. It is kind of a system to ward off drones. It is very expensive technology and it's also marked up to be very expensive. And I think it also illegal in America.

Speaker A:

Yeah, you're not supposed to mess with aircraft in America. You can't. You're not allowed to. Like if you own property and you buy a drone and you put the drone in the air and you have a legal gun, you can't shoot the drone that's in the air. On your.

Speaker B:

Come to Ukraine. Come to Ukraine. You can do anything here. Come to Ukraine. I can teach you how to fly drones.

Speaker A:

Freedom.

Speaker B:

I say again, I can teach you how to fly drones. Yeah, that's that. It's incredible fun actually. Everyone should try that. Oh, I'm sure after this in particular allowed to the United States. Oh no. Yeah. I mean when you are flying them just for fun, like you can get a tiny whoop that's really, really small. It fits in the palm of your hand and to fly around like chase the cat, that's really fun.

Speaker A:

Yeah.

Speaker B:

I mean when it is chasing you, it's not very fun. That's for sure. And. But to be a pilot is more fun. Is. I always say it's always better to be on the giving side of the fiber optic. So.

Speaker A:

Yeah, that makes sense.

Speaker B:

Yeah. So.

Speaker A:

And for people, the fiber optic thing. Could you. Could you explain the fiber optic thing? Because I only learned about this kind of recently through like YouTube and stuff. But I follow different youtubes than probably most of our audience.

Speaker B:

So to be very Very simple about it. Right. A fiber optic cable is the same cable that provides fiber optic Internet. It is just very, very thin. And the signal is going through this cable. Right. The controls of the drone are being transmitted through this very, very thin. It's like a spider web almost cable. And the spool of the drone can be 25, 30 kilometers, which if you think about it, is a lot. And as the. This fabric, this little thread is so, so thin, the spool itself doesn't weight too much. So the fiber optic drone is carrying both the charge. Right. So a PG7 and a PG7 is a kind of bomb.

Speaker A:

Okay.

Speaker B:

And a spool. Right. And yeah, that's basically what is it. It's a standard fpv, but it is resistant to the electronic warfare. This is also very important here because. So the normal FPV is controlled by radio signal. It is not physically attached, right. As the fiber optic one to the station. Right. To where the pilot is, let's say. But because it is signal, it can be jammed by the ew. But the fiber optic, as it cannot be jammed, possesses such an immense threat for armor, for personnel, for positions, for anything that is trying to move on the battlefield. And therefore that creates a very particular kill zone that is from 30 to 60 kilometers of the front line. Right.

Speaker A:

Okay.

Speaker B:

And that is why anything that moves in this kill zone is under quite a threat because of this technology.

Speaker A:

And so what do people do to counter that? I know there's. I know with drones in general, people are setting up like nets over the roadways. Can you just like go into the forest and it's too tangly for fiber optics or, you know, what are people doing about it?

Speaker B:

No, no, it's just gonna try to kill you until you're dead, if that makes sense. But no, the way to counteract the fiber optic drones is to shoot them, to physically shoot them with your rifle or with a shotgun. So shooting shotgun is notoriously fun, but now it takes a new turn because you have to shoot flying creature that is there to. To kill you. Yeah.

Speaker A:

Can you use bird shot or do you have to use buckshot? Like what kind of a bird shot?

Speaker B:

You use bird shot. But there are also specialized ammo for drones that is produced in Ukraine so that like this little pieces inside are entangled between each other. So it's like, creates.

Speaker A:

Oh, a little, like web.

Speaker B:

A little web, yes. There are also net guns that are kind of hand pistols, but it's not shooting 9 millimeter, but a net, which are also effective, but close range and you still can be affected by the shrapnel from the warhead if it's anti personnel.

Speaker A:

Okay, what about tunnels?

Speaker B:

We should dig tunnels as well as Russians do.

Speaker A:

Oh, are they the. Are they the masters of the tunnels? Are you all winning on drones and they're winning on tunnels or.

Speaker B:

No, no, they. Actually, I was thinking about this question before and I was like, that's what I'm gonna tell. Do you know about the pipe? There is this notorious Russian warfare thing where they find the old underground communications and send the infantry there into the meat grinder on little kind of pulleys or little small vehicles. Right. That can fit into the tunnel and they just go for tens of kilometers in this dark, moist, horrified pipes.

Speaker A:

Wow.

Speaker B:

And then when you come out and there are Ukrainians waiting for you. What a surprise. Yeah. So it's not only tunnels, but I mean, I guess that also qualifies as a tunnel, right?

Speaker A:

Pre existing tunnels.

Speaker B:

Yeah. Yeah. No, I would say that the trenches, the trenches are kind of this way of surviving. If you are in a trench, if you are in a position in a fortified position that was built there before you, then you have a better chance at surviving. But as well, it is quite hellish because Russian use a lot of fiber optic and heavier drones, heavy lifting drones, when they figure out that Ukrainian personnel is there and they just destroy the position. And the. So the blind dash is kind of a fortified position. Right. And the roof of the blind dash is usually fortified with really thick pine tree trunks. Right.

Speaker A:

Okay.

Speaker B:

So if it was a pre existing position and the force of the explosions is so immense that it over time it breaks through this kind of layers and layers of wood and cement and whatnot. And that possesses a big threat because regardless if you're underground, if you are seen going into that position, you are still not safe.

Speaker A:

Right. And they're watching with like thermal.

Speaker B:

I assume that as well also a way to. In winter, for example. This is a kind of an insight into a drone operating craft in winter when you are using the thermal camera. A skilled operator that knows the terrain well can determine via the thermal imprints on the screen. Right. Via the thermal image which position is occupied or not. Because if people are there, they're still. The position gets warmer, even if they're not using anything to warm themselves up with. Right. Like a trench candle or something like this. So this is also. It works both ways, unfortunately.

Speaker A:

Yeah.

Speaker B:

So yeah, it's a very honorable craft to be an infantryman, infantry personnel. And it is very, very hard. And my heart goes to all the Ukrainian infantry out there. Thank you.

Speaker A:

Yeah. What is it like living in war? This is obviously a big question, but when you cycle off of the front, I'm making this up. I'm guessing that you cycle off the front line and then you're out on the front line and then you're spending time in cities that are like affected, but less affected. And then, you know, like how, how disrupted is everyday life? What does everyday life look like?

Speaker B:

I don't think the listeners are going to believe me, but this is Ukrainian reality. I would make an example. The city of Zaporizhzhia. It's the south of Ukraine nowadays. It's beautiful, it's sunny. So Russians are less than 50 km from the city itself. The front line is there in the city. You can get a beautiful espresso tonic for less than $2. And you sit there on the terrace on your day off, you drink this protonic and life is beautiful. The next day it might be something different, but on this particular day you'll be vibing. And I don't think such a contrast could be happening anywhere in the world, especially in Europe, because people are just resilient, you know. And of course there is the darkness there. There is a funeral procession every day. There is. Well, the job that you do, it doesn't really let you have time off you at any moment. There is. Your phone is chiming all the time because there is like updates and stuff. Even when you have of rotation. Right. And you have a free moment usually when you're not on combat duty, you prepare for your next rotation. You work on the drones, you adjust the settings. You do manual labor with screwing things together and gluing them and whatnot. We have to keep in mind here that most of the things are single use and very cheap. So you have to like make them perfect to fly just once. They have to work only once.

Speaker A:

Yeah.

Speaker B:

So yeah, it's a lot of prep actually goes into this. It's not one button and that's all tedious.

Speaker A:

Yeah.

Speaker B:

So yeah, it's, it's a contrast, but it is very, very precious to me.

Speaker A:

Yeah, well, how can people support you? It seems like one of the things I follow you on Instagram and one of the things that you post about is, I don't remember if it's solidarity collectives or different groups that fundraise to get materials to anti authoritarian fighters in Ukraine. And it seems like one of the things that's happening in the same way that the state is not necessarily that the Ukrainian Military is a little bit more chaotic than people might expect. So it seems like a lot of units are also fundraising for their own equipment. How does all that work and. Or how can people support you and other anti authoritarians?

Speaker B:

Thank you, that's an excellent question. And over the years, me and my team has been supported greatly by anti authoritarian initiatives. And I'm very thankful for that. Usually at this moment, what we are and me on my Instagram, what I fundraise for is the essentials, like stuff that you need for this manual work that I have described. There is a lot of engineering things like for soldering or basic things that you need a lot like zip ties. There is, I don't know, 10 zip ties per one because you have to adjust everything, but without would not be working. And if you yourself would buy the zip ties out of your own pocket, it would be $800 per month. So this is.

Speaker A:

Zip ties are like the cheapest thing I can think of. If I were to think of an object that's cheap, I literally think of a zip tie.

Speaker B:

No, but this is thousands and thousands.

Speaker A:

Yeah, no, no, I believe you. That's what's so crazy about it.

Speaker B:

Yeah. And you know, this, this is something that people don't realize about this. All this is non American tech. Like it needs some enhancements in order to. To be working. But in the end of the day, this is what we are winning with. This is what makes Ukraine stand for such a long time, is the talent of people to make things work. Right.

Speaker A:

Yeah.

Speaker B:

So yes, from time to time I fundraise stuff. I also have a PayPal that we use for such needs. Also, the main thing is obviously not the zip ties, but car repairs, because cars break a lot, especially when people

Speaker A:

are shooting at them.

Speaker B:

Oh, yeah. Well, we don't really do infills on pickup trucks anymore.

Speaker A:

Oh, okay.

Speaker B:

Yeah, the front line has changed a lot. That's very. Not usual anymore. This needs to be a very, very good pickup truck. So it's mainly for logistics. Like, I mean, you have to transport yourself around and the drones as well. Yeah. So the cars are shitty and they break. That's also a thing.

Speaker A:

So would you add car repair to your list of. You talked about some skills that people could learn.

Speaker B:

Oh yeah, 100. Unfortunately, I do not possess such a skill, but if someone's willing to teach me, my dams are open.

Speaker A:

Cool. Okay, well, where are your DMs? Like, how can people follow your work and get more information about what's going on and how to help?

Speaker B:

So my publicly available Instagram account is polycycho and you can find me there. I post pictures and essays and my blog is a mess of all things scare and beautiful.

Speaker A:

Awesome. Well, yeah, thank you so much for taking time out of war to talk to Americans about a possible but probably not likely war. It's appreciated. Thank you.

Speaker B:

Of course, it's my pleasure. I am very happy to be here and I Love your work, Ms. Margaret. It and I hope Americans will find the power within.

Speaker A:

Yeah, that does seem like one of the ways the world would the entire world would do a lot better if Americans were able to accomplish some certain things here. All right, well, thank you all so much for listening. And if you want to support what's going on over there, you can follow Polly Psycho Underscore on Instagram. And if you want to support us, this podcast is published by Strangers in a Tangled Wilderness. We're an anarchist collective publisher and we're primarily supported on patreon, which is patreon.com strangers in a tangled Wilderness. If you follow us there, we'll send you a zine anywhere in the world. Well, anywhere that the post office will take a zine, which is probably fewer places than it used to, but I haven't heard any complaints yet. But I don't know. And if you follow us at $20 a month, I will read your or whoever's the host will read your name or whatever it is strange collection of syllables you want us to read. Like for example, I want to thank the first two chapters of the Eden Project by James Hollis. And I want to thank the Truth that we will outlive them and the Pocono Pink Pistols and the Kiwuna Socialists and the Astoria Food Pantry the Athens People's assembly of Athens, GA opticuna TSNB baby Acab and her three great pups Sarah Mr. Crafty your Canadian friend Mark Tiny Nonsense The Golden Gate 26 the Ko Initiative the incredible Renai Alexander Gopal A Future for Abby, Hyunhi Max the Enchanted Rats of Turtle Island Lancaster chooses Love Karen the Canadian Socialist Rifle association the Massachusetts chapter of the Socialist Rifle Association Farrell in West Virginia Blink Cat Sholva, Jason, Jenny and Phoebe the Cats Aiden and Yuki the Dog Sunshine Amber Ephemeral Appalachian Liberation Library Portland's Hedron Hackerspace Boldfield xcenered X Julia Carson, Lord Harken Community Books of Stone Mountain, Georgia Princess Miranda, Janice Nodell Ally Paparuna, Milica, Theo sj, Paige, David, Dana, Micah Kirk, Chris, Micaiah, Nicole and Tivka the Dog Hoss the Dog and I also want to thank the people who supported one of our most recent Kickstarters. And those people include Simon Weil, Staying Hydrated, brought to you by Hannah Potatoes, Tenebris Press, arguing about what to shout Out, Experimental Farm Network Accordions, Dolly Parton and Edgar Meowlin Poe, the Cats, the Black Trowel Collective, Groot the Dog, the KO Initiative. Again, thank you, KO Initiative. Nico the Waterfront Project, Tivka's favorite stick, Uliksean Alder Na, which I hope means na beer, because I really like na beer. Be kind and talk to strangers. And Cool Zone Media, which I suspect was not actually Cool Zone Media. I suspect that someone put that in there as a joke. But maybe my other job supports this job and that would be nice. All right, thank you all so much and take care of each other and fuck ice and I don't know Russia well, the Russian government and yeah, bye everyone.

 

Comments

Malatester (not verified) Sat, 07/11/2026 - 09:21

"I'm not fighting for the state. I'm fighting for things I believe in."

Well, that about sums it up doesn't it? I wish I was stupid enough to think like this, to think that my beliefs alone could change reality if my job was as a state employee, so that I wouldn't actually be working for the state. Get a job as a cop but say to yourself you're fighting for your anarchist beliefs not the police force and the state and capitalists it serves. Keep lying to yourself and others, it will work out eventually. Anarchy is when you're delusional and try to drag other people down with you.

Billy (not verified) Sat, 07/11/2026 - 14:41

In reply to by Malatester (not verified)

We can't allow ourselves to be corrupted by the impurity of the state. When fascists come to kill me I won't even use a gun if it's been created by, given to me by or stolen from me by the state. I will just sit there and die, knowing I've been so pure as to do what the fascists want. As long as we are not a part of the state we are pure and good. I don't even collect my welfare or drink from the tap because that's the states money and the state controls the water supply. I don't even walk on the roads because the state built them, I just float above them.

You clearly don't just want the Russian state to win. Definitely not based on your other posts.

Everyone must die or run away because the state, the state, the state!

anonymous (not verified) Sat, 07/11/2026 - 15:13

In reply to by Billy (not verified)

the options are not binary: there are things that are possible to do beyond join the state military or die in your chair.

and i for one am not telling people not to join the state military. i just think it's not an anarchist thing to do. you're not being an anarchist inside of a state function. sometimes we're not anarchists. better to be clear about that than to make the label "anarchist" meaningless...

Malatester (not verified) Sat, 07/11/2026 - 18:59

In reply to by Billy (not verified)

Nah, it's the other way around, when I walk on the roads, they magically become anarchist roads because I'm an anarchist! When I collect my welfare and drink water from the tap they become anarchist too. I don't need to just sit there and do nothing, because whatever I do, it becomes anarchist by simple virtue of an anarchist doing it. When you just lied about me and said I want the Russian state to win, lying about anarchists became anarchist as well, assuming of course that you're an anarchist. But if you're a statist, well then everything you do becomes statist. That's the magical power of thought! It doesn't matter in the slightest what the function of the State is, it doesn't matter in the slightest what the cops are and what they're for. All that matters is my personal beliefs and how they override everything else in reality. The crazy thing is that the power of one person's thought is enough to make Russia lose. We don't even both need to believe in it to make it happen. Only one of us has to. Which makes it strange that you're wasting time arguing with me when you could be toppling all the states in the world with your mind alone.

not the other … (not verified) Sun, 07/12/2026 - 19:56

In reply to by Billy (not verified)

do you apply the same logic to supporting hamas, iran, etc ? do you really deny the extreme right influence in ukrainian nationalism? (i won’t ask you whether there can ever be nationalism without statism, ethnic cleansing and so on… you don’t see ready for that)

i just need to point out one thing, which is that most anarchists have no problem mocking the “lesser evil” argument for voting, but a lot also are fine with picking up a gun to fight and die for some state (or state-in-waiting) for the exact same rationale. “but they’re going through a war/genocide!” so what you’re saying is that in a tight spot your dearest principles go right out of the window. cool bro, good to know you have no actual beliefs.

i’m sure your enthusiasm for military adventures isn’t about larping but is actually a really well thought application of “oppression olympics” calculus to the supposedly eternal entities known as “nations”. (don’t think i ought to ask you about rojava and its recent capitulation either)

anonymous (not verified) Mon, 07/13/2026 - 08:40

In reply to by Billy (not verified)

"Everyone must die or run away because the state, the state, the state!"

Yes, flatly and unironically, these are the conditions for random people in Ukraine. Which is why some Ukrainians have managed to flee, while a lot more ended up on the front, by force, and killed. As it seems I need to inform you that Ukraine has a conscription in place.

Billy (not verified) Mon, 07/13/2026 - 09:59

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

Everyone paying attention knows this.

The discourse in the comments section of this site and elsewhere has been dire at times.

You notice I didn't condemn those that fled either.

We can go round and round in circles on this. Those claiming it is anarchist to not fight in this war and determined to sneer at those who give their lives to fight a fascist invasion - whatever. I and almost nobody else cares that you think.

Your beliefs, your identity, your labels, all of those things are your own.

"Is it anarchist to X, is it anarchist to y?" You know what, when it comes down to it, there's a war and you can claim that people are 'fighting for the state' when they are choosing to be a part of it to fight for themselves and their friends and family and everyone else where they live and I just don't care.

The Russians have a website where their citizens can buy abducted Ukrainian children to use as domestic servants. Anyone can look this information up.

There is not going to be an abolition of the state in either of the places we call Ukraine or Russia anytime soon. That is not realistically something that will happen. So no, this war will not end in the abilition of the state form.

I find the purity testing of the people fighting fascists at risk of death to be repellant.

Support these people ffs!

anonymous (not verified) Mon, 07/13/2026 - 12:33

In reply to by Billy (not verified)

a.. you're still operating with an implicit binary. for example we can support people and also be critical of them

b. people are mostly (here) validly pushing back against the statement by both magpie and kafa that she is participating in anarchist activity, which she is not. and you would think magpie would know better

c. you can think that the russian state is worse than the ukrainian one, and maybe right now they are, but that doesn't mean that the ukrainian state wouldn't do the exact same thing (or worse) if given the opportunity. 

d. if you don't care what we think then why are you here arguing your point? 

and so on.

Billy (not verified) Mon, 07/13/2026 - 12:51

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

The Russian state **most certainly is** worse than the Ukrainian one.

This attempt to collapse the two into a relativisation is deeply suspect.

The idea that 'oh if Ukraine wins it will do the same thing to Russia' is just nonsense.

Malatester (not verified) Mon, 07/13/2026 - 14:44

In reply to by Billy (not verified)

"...there's a war and you can claim that people are 'fighting for the state' when they are choosing to be a part of it to fight for themselves and their friends and family and everyone else where they live..."

Your confusion stems from your inability to see that these two things don't contradict each other at all: someone can fully believe they're only fighting for themselves (and friends and family and countrypeople) AND at the same time be a state employee, a soldier for the state, someone who follows the orders of their commanding officer and the state military hierarchy (someone who goes along with conscription of people who don't want to fight and die for the state).

A person can also think supporting the Ukrainian state war effort is the right thing to do and not be an anarchist and not lie and call it the anarchist thing to do. Most people around the world who support the Ukrainian state war effort are not anarchists, they're statists. Unless some state agent literally or figuratively has a gun to your head and is ordering you to lie and call fighting in a state army the anarchist thing to do, you don't have to lie and say that fighting for a state is a form of anarchism! I always have to breathe air, I will die if I don't. I will never lie and call breathing air "anarchist", I will never engage in public morality shaming of other people who also know that breathing air (or fighting in a state army) is not anarchist.

Anarchists are so small in numbers and resources compared to the massive scale of NATO support for Ukraine, I don't even understand how this lie is supposed to support the war effort. What would you rather have, one more fool like Margaret supporting the war on a podcast, or another billion dollars worth of weaponry from a NATO country? If you're relying on anarchists to beat Russia rather than NATO, you're the one who wants Russia to win.

Billy (not verified) Sat, 07/11/2026 - 15:51

She says she's an anarchist because that's what she believes in and who she is.

I find it very hard to see what the other options are. Almost none of us on Earth are ever or always 'outside the state function'.

She's an anarchist and you have to admit she's at least an antifascist. She's also a hero with more courage than either of us so I respect her.

anonymous (not verified) Sat, 07/11/2026 - 17:11

In reply to by Billy (not verified)

i'm not doubting their self identification. there are all kinds of anarchists. and all kinds of confusion. being an anti-fascist is irrelevant to me, as it's a much broader and perhaps even less meaningful label than anarchist is.

there are many kinds of courage. 

Wayne Price@ (not verified) Sun, 07/12/2026 - 15:37

In reply to by Billy (not verified)

The "tag" declares "fighting in State military is not anarchist." It does not distinguish between fighting in a war between imperialist states and the just, defensive, war of an oppressed people (ruled by a state and capitalist class) against an imperialist state's invasion.

If working for a capitalist State is un-anarchist, then is it un-anarchist to be a state teacher in a public school or a librarian in a State library? Or a construction worker on a highway road-mending crew? Or a worker in a private capitalist factory, office, or mine? Oh, you might say, these are (more-or-less) useful and productive activities, not like being soldiers who aim to kill people for capitalism! But when a regular army is used to resist an colonizing invasion, occupation, and massacre, that too is a useful thing (anarchists should criticize regular armies for many things, but not for defending [non-imperialist] countries from colonialist conquest).

Of course, in *any* of these jobs, revolutionary anarchists should look for ways to make anti-capitalist, anti-state, propaganda wherever possible.

While making breakfast may be an example of an anarchist doing something which is not particularly anarchist, taking a job, military or otherwise, should be done *as an anarchist.*

EmmaAintDead Sun, 07/12/2026 - 21:47

In reply to by Wayne Price@ (not verified)

is it un-anarchist to be a state teacher in a public school or a librarian in a State library? Or a construction worker on a highway road-mending crew? Or a worker in a private capitalist factory, office, or mine?

I mean... yeah. None of those jobs have anything to do with anarchy and would not exist if anarchists got their way. Participation in them is definitionally un-anarchist. You know about Bob Black already, though, Wayne. You know this argument has already happened a million times and that the roads won't be patched and the TVs won't be assembled ATR or whatever. All of those things ARE being rejected now, and you'd hear those rejections if you took your fingers out of your ears for just a few seconds. 

But you are on to a distinct difference. The Global Library Industrial Complex isn't carving up the fucking planet we live on. So one IS way worse to participate in during our current moment. 

Still worth keeping an eye on librarians just in case. The shady fucks.

anonymous (not verified) Tue, 07/14/2026 - 07:43

In reply to by Billy (not verified)

Your comment could have just been shortened to: "She's an anarchist because that's what she said she is!"

Same for Elon, who did claim being anarchist (article was posted on this site)... or whatever Neonazi faction with "anarchist pretense" you got in Ukraine.

SPEC OPS: THE LINE (not verified) Sun, 07/12/2026 - 01:20

I guarantee there will be atrocities committed somewhere on the globe, sometime in the near future, under the auspices of a circle A. In the meantime, if you are a true anarcho-NATOist*, join now, save a Ukrainian brother from busification.

*anarcho-BRICians, remember Russell Bentley

Billy (not verified) Mon, 07/13/2026 - 10:02

In reply to by SPEC OPS: THE LINE (not verified)

Atrocities where committed against Mennonites by Anarchists, all the worst forms of violence. Anarchists have done a lot of violent things before.

A circle A symbol is no guarantee of anything because it is a symbol anyone can use.

SPEC OPS: THE LINE (not verified) Tue, 07/14/2026 - 07:50

In reply to by Billy (not verified)

The Mennonites story was blackbaiting, got debunked years ago, https://libcom.org/history/makhnovists-mennonites-war-peace-ukrainian-c…

I’m well informed of violence overstepping the mark, but cooperation with states + the affect of the internet on people’s brains will usher in a new frontier. Rojava was the start, Ukraine is a step up. Asia next?

Cero (not verified) Mon, 07/13/2026 - 05:33

Some interviews should be shelved and integrity preserved. Ain't sh!+ anarchist about a States military. If you want to go fight for the State then take off your anarchist cap and put on your State cap.

anonymous (not verified) Mon, 07/13/2026 - 07:42

In reply to by Cero (not verified)

as magpie indicates (and chisel notes) half way through the conversation is when the point is broached -- what are kafa's thoughts on living through and fighting modern warfare. those are worth skipping ahead to. 

Cero (not verified) Mon, 07/13/2026 - 11:23

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

Yea but did any of it add anything to the conversation from a anarchist perspective? The most interesting part imo was about the fiber optic cable drones and that's been reported on by the MSN 🤷‍♂️

Malatester (not verified) Mon, 07/13/2026 - 17:20

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

Magpie also describes it as cowardly to not fight for the state in Ukraine. This is someone who claims to know anarchist history, who's supposed to know that Makhno and Radowitsky didn't die in Ukraine and would be cowards under her definition.

Wayne Price@ (not verified) Mon, 07/13/2026 - 16:51

In reply to by Cero (not verified)

In a short comment, Cero first suggests that "some interviews" should be banned (that what "put on the shelf" implies here)s, which does not seem to be very freedom-oriented. And then declares, "If you want to go fight for the State then take off your anarchist cap and put on your State cap."

Like so many (not the original interviewee), Cero simply cannot distinguish between the State and a people (nation, country, whatever). As the interviewee says, she wants to fight for her people, her country, against an imperialist invader. She does not want to fight for the State. Unfortunately, at this time and place, the opportunity to organize a non-state revolutionary anarchist army in Ukraine is not (yet?) available. What then do you propose that she do?

I can think of three things: (1) do non-military activities such as provide food, become medics, help refugees and their children, etc. But the issue will ultimately be settled through war; or (2) join the regular State army and fight the invaders while continuing to organize and propagandize for anarchism; or (3) support neither side (the invader and the invaded both have States, after all).

I do not call on Ukrainian anarchists (or anyone) to fight in the bourgeois army. But I defend those anarchists who make the decision to do so. Personally I do not see what is *anarchist* about equating the oppressor and the oppressed.

Cero (not verified) Tue, 07/14/2026 - 08:32

In reply to by Wayne Price@ (not verified)

That's a lot of assumptions you got going on there. Please don't pretend there are not other alternatives to resistance outside of the state because that implies a near loss in one's own agency.

Malatester (not verified) Tue, 07/14/2026 - 09:11

In reply to by Wayne Price@ (not verified)

Simple questions for you Price, which country was the oppressor and the oppressed in WWI when big bad Germany invaded tiny little innocent Belgium (with its big colony in Africa)? Are the Indigenous peoples of Quebec oppressing the Quebecois by interfering with their struggle for liberation from Anglo-Canada?

Wayne Price@ (not verified) Tue, 07/14/2026 - 16:49

In reply to by Malatester (not verified)

To Malatester: In World War I (as I have said repeatedly) both Imperial Germany and the kingdom of Belgium (which, as you say, had a "big colony in Africa") were imperialist nation-states. Revolutionary anarchists, syndicalists, and socialists opposed both sides, and called for revolution against both sides (as did Malatesta, against the small group of anarchists around Kropotkin).

On the other hand, Ukraine, while getting aid from Western imperialism (not so much from the U.S. under Trump), is not an imperialist empire. It is an oppressed nation (even with a capitalist class and a state) which is being assaulted by an imperialist state. I do not care about its state and bourgeoisie, but I am in solidarity with the Ukrainian people, especially its working class. This is consistent with Malatesta's approach.

Issues involving the relations among the Anglo-Canadian state, the Quebecois people, and the Indigenous people are too complex to give a simple answer to. However, since you care so much about Indigenous people, what do you think about the Crimean Tartars? They have been badly oppressed by the Russian state for generations. Now they are generally in favor of Crimea uniting with Ukraine (which is not perfect but much better than Russia for them) rather than with Russia.

Malatester (not verified) Tue, 07/14/2026 - 18:44

In reply to by Wayne Price@ (not verified)

I didn't ask you for a history lesson about anarchist positions on WWI, Price, since I am more aware of that history than you are, as has already been shown here previously in your ignorance of Malatesta's writing on the primary enemy being at home.

The point of the Belgium example is simply that being invaded by an imperialist/oppressor country does NOT determine whether the invaded country is an oppressed country or not! It could be that both countries are imperialist/oppressors, as both Belgium and Germany were. It was not to say that Ukraine today and Belgium circa WWI are identical in every way. It was only to say that it is NOT possible to determine whether or not Ukraine is an imperialist/oppressor or oppressed country on the basis of Russian invasion alone. Other factors and context are necessary.

But since you say you think it's too complicated to tell whether the Quebecois are colonizers of Indigenous peoples are not, you're clearly a lazy and racist thinker, so I won't get into all the ways Ukraine might be imperialist with you (occupying Iraq, arming the Gulf monarchies against Iran, etc.) You are no comrade to the invaded, you are a supporter of settler colonialism. And it's good to know who our enemies are.

slavainsania (not verified) Tue, 07/14/2026 - 06:04

"I'm not fighting for the state. I'm fighting for things I believe in." - meanwhile the leader of the state you actually ARE fighting for (no matter what kind of mental gymnastics you do in order to convince yourself that you are not!) finds time out from his schedule of forcing military age men into an absolute fucking human meat grinder of a conflict to pop over to Israel and give them tech to commit further genocidal attacks against the Palestinian people and more recently this fucking state that you have convinced yourself you are not fighting for is now gleefully destroying the environment by targeting oil and other fuel infrastructure in Russia! But I'm sure there are some deranged Ukrainian eco-anarchists who aren't fighting for the state either who will try and school us all on how it is necessary to carry out an environmental holocaust for the final anarchist victory against Russia and how I must support Russian because I can see through the sheer hypocrisy of the Ukrainian Anarchist contingent of the Ukrainian National Armed Forces.

anonymous (not verified) Tue, 07/14/2026 - 06:06

Violent Mobilization Clash in Lviv Sparks Official Backlash
https://www.kyivpost.com/post/79920

"In brief: On Tuesday, a confrontation between military recruitment officers and local residents in Lviv escalated after a man wanted for violating military registration rules was detained. Authorities announced investigations into both the actions of the officers and those who obstructed them, while the Office of the President and the Ministry of Defense condemned the attack on servicemen and called for those responsible to be held accountable."

SPEC OPS: THE LINE (not verified) Tue, 07/14/2026 - 07:37

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

No one ever responds to these. There is no busification, there is no mass desertion, there are not cannon fodder in the trenches. Slava Ukraine, *kawaii peace sign gesture*, “what about Russia”, etc etc.

Then people will cry when the same tactics are applied at home. :P

Wayne Price@ (not verified) Tue, 07/14/2026 - 17:09

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

A series of Comments inform us that the Ukrainian government does some bad things. It enforces conscription. It forces men into the army. It maintains a regular bourgeois army. It gets aid from NATO members and helps Western imperialism and Israel. It has police. It enforces austerity and union-busting on its workers. And so on.

These and other repressive policies demonstrate that Ukraine has a state (for all its limited democratic features) and a capitalist upper class. This is why revolutionary anarchists support workers and others in opposition to the state (support strikes, for example). It is why we do not give *political* support to Zelensky (we don't vote for him; we don't join his government; we oppose his policies; we support strikes and demonstrations). It is why we advocate the goal of a popular revolution to overturn the Ukrainian state and replace it with alternate institutions.

But none of this changes the fact that the people of Ukraine are being invaded, occupied, and massacred by the Russian empire! Or that the Ukrainian workers and others are being attacked and killed, while they are fighting back and dying (the Ukrainian people, not the people of Western imperialist nations). The people are not the state and the state is not the people.

SPEC OPS: THE LINE (not verified) Wed, 07/15/2026 - 10:07

In reply to by Wayne Price@ (not verified)

And then the people of Donbas say they’re being shelled by Ukraine. Ukrainians by Russians. The Russians by THE WEST. The West amongst themselves (soon), War is a business, and it’s none of ours. I wish all sides defeat.

anonymous (not verified) Wed, 07/15/2026 - 12:52

In reply to by SPEC OPS: THE LINE (not verified)

I agree. Cheerleading for a victory by Ukraine, like Wayne and 1-2 others here did, ain't a very anarchist thing to do... as regardless the meaning you apply to it, it'll be a victory for the Ukrainian state and especially its foreign backers/profiteers, more than the "Ukrainian People" (which I'd rather honestly just be calling, "the poor", or just "people"). There's also a related ongoing ecocide resulting from this war.

And whatever's at the end of it, the great tech advance of this particular war will be drones. That will be turned against us all, sooner or later. And no the Global Mass Proletarian Revolution likely won't work against fleets of killer drones. It maybe *could*... but we're already vastly behind schedule on this one, so it might have to become a widespread anti-tech revolt, anyways.

anonymous (not verified) Wed, 07/15/2026 - 13:35

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

but have you considered that it’s WAY COOL when anarchists have guns, just like MAKHNO did? who cares if we have to fight alongside fascists to get our hands on them? hey maybe we should try that here. anarchists get deputized by ice - get trained in violence and defend the american “people” -!

note to mods, this is sarcasm (they don’t seem to like this type of joke in the past)

Billy (not verified) Wed, 07/15/2026 - 14:31

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

This discourse is just purity politics.

'Victory for the Ukrainian state'. I guess when we defeated the Nazis that was a victory for all the states they were invading and attacking, so that's a bad thing? Nah.

The victory of the Ukrainian state is also a victory for the people there. This isn't something any sane person would deny. It's actually literally insane for any anarchist to claim the state should be worse because I the anarchist is about to overthrow it and all that matters is my purified separation from it. We would end up saying it's bad that there's any welfare or healthcare at all.

Absolutely no serious anti fascist militant plays a game where they relativize every state. They try to work out what it will do and how to survive and what can be done in its wake.

I don't see ethics this way - where you see the state as this kind of thing, over there, like nature, and our goal is just to purify ourselves by pretending we can escape it. Then we can't. Then that's it. Then the fascists come and we just whine that others aren't running away.

The state is an abstraction but it is also real, and thus it is interwoven into our lives. We can rarely escape it fully, and if we can, where do we end up? Often in unsurvivable deserts and isolation, wherein we don't find salvation but other people who turn out to be their own problem for us.

Until anarchist theory moves to update itself and reframes it's definition of the state we won't get anywhere. We just spectate other people's suffering then cynically snark at them.

I think there should be some serious theoretical work done here. I am not satisfied at all with the way the state is used in discourse. It needs redefined as does our relation to it and we need a proper and rigorous theorisation of it's nature and relation and function and our strategies within it.

Claiming this war is the cause of drone war rather than a manifestation of what was already inevitable.

The people that want to kill us have drones. That much is certain. I prefer to survive and figure out how the new tech works first or at least catch up to them.

Anti tech doesn't matter and awful lot in this world today.

The idea being implied in a lot of these posts is that being anarchist is some sort of pure pacifism that can save us. It's not.

I am not interested in this kind of 'you can't be the label because you're not pure enough because you don't live in a shack in the middle of nowhere' stuff.

anonymous (not verified) Wed, 07/15/2026 - 15:37

In reply to by Billy (not verified)

not just purity politics, but it's not hard to read purity politics into stuff, especially when you're being simplistic. 

as someone who has been disagreeing with you here, i applaud your understanding that the state is not something outside of ourselves. we certainly agree on that. and of course, disagree as to the appropriate responses and consequent concerns. 

anyway, not that interested in continuing to talk to someone who simplifies everything into yes or no. again, NO ONE is talking about people just dying, at least not except you. many of us just think there are more options than you seem to believe in. not easy options. not simple options. maybe not realistic options. but options that are worth talking about and considering, and certainly options that are not abandoning anarchist principles and then calling it anarchist

 

Billy (not verified) Wed, 07/15/2026 - 16:24

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

You haven't explained those options.

Antifascism comes down to an ugly us Vs them struggle sometimes.

It just does.

There is no realistic option for this war to be stopped by anarchists today other than making sure Russia loses.

Other situations, there are other options, absolutely. But not in this one.

Malatester (not verified) Wed, 07/15/2026 - 18:10

In reply to by Billy (not verified)

Assuming you are 100% correct that only the Ukrainian state (armed in part with Israeli weapons) and its NATO allies can defeat Russia, this still leaves you the option of not lying, of owning up to the fact that this has nothing to do with anarchism. Labeling non-anarchists things, like state armies, as "anarchist" isn't going to get you any closer to winning your statist war. It's actually extremely foolish to rely on a handful of anarchists to win the war when you already have billions of dollars in NATO weaponry. Ukraine is the biggest importer of arms in the entire world. How does a few anarchists being delusional compare with that?

Also, the Nazis being defeated in WWII can be a good thing and at the same time not be anarchist. If, by your definition, defeating the Nazis was "anarchist" then the Soviet Union and the United States became anarchist states after the war. This kind of delusional thinking has nothing to do with purity, aside from it being purely delusional, deceitful, manipulative and moralistic.

anonymous (not verified) Wed, 07/15/2026 - 20:23

In reply to by Billy (not verified)

"There is no realistic option for this war to be stopped by anarchists today other than making sure Ukraine AND Russia loses."

FTFY.

As either winning will not be a win for the Ukrainians. And likely you know this but are too hypocritical to recognize it. The goal of this war is a total takeover for either NATO or Russian oligarchs. There's zero in-between.

SPEC OPS: THE LINE (not verified) Thu, 07/16/2026 - 04:19

In reply to by Billy (not verified)

“Serious”, “realistic”, “real”. As cliched as join a union or talk to friends and colleagues. Look Billy, if you want to do a WW2 popular front, knock yourself out. But put some skin in the game at least, bit commissarish to want others to do the dying. Even in the Battle of the Somme the officers lead from the front.

Billy (not verified) Thu, 07/16/2026 - 10:06

Watching this thread degrade into one big cowardly strop where men shout at a woman risking her life to fight fascists because they can't tolerate her using their precious label 'anarchist' incorrectly.

I'm sure the fascists are terrified of you guys. You're real heroes.

Malatester (not verified) Thu, 07/16/2026 - 12:19

In reply to by Billy (not verified)

She has the protection of the Ukrainian state and NATO. Ukraine is getting more arms than any other country on earth. Why does she need the support of anonymous anarchist commenters on a website? Why does she deserve more support than Palestinian or Lebanese women who are being slaughtered by Ukraine's allies? How is she fighting fascism by joining an army with multiple fascist regiments? The Solidarity Collectives platform the fascist Right Sector and OUN/UPA flag. You and her tolerate antisemitism and pogroms in the name of fighting fascism? My grandparents fought the Nazis that your OUN/UPA heroes were busy collaborating with and making public proclamations in support of. We are on opposite sides of the anti-fascist struggle. You're on the same side as the Active Club fascists of North America who idolize and work with Ukrainian fascists.

Billy (not verified) Thu, 07/16/2026 - 12:45

In reply to by Malatester (not verified)

I guess you can accuse me of whatever made up shit you want lol.

But guess what, my grandfather also fought the Nazis, he was in the British army. My grandmother worked hard on the home front too.

We won. It would have been a longer and harder fight had the Americans not shown up late in the game.

I hope Ukraine wins too.

anonymous (not verified) Thu, 07/16/2026 - 14:38

In reply to by Billy (not verified)

Well Russia's definitely not Nazi Germany (despite being fascistic), nor it has the capacity to invade more European countries. That can barely hold their ground in Ukraine these days. All these fears about a Russian invasion of the EU are just for pushing the military industry and the profits that come with it.

Malatester (not verified) Thu, 07/16/2026 - 16:35

In reply to by Billy (not verified)

I'm not American either.

I didn't make up the Act of Restoration of the Ukrainian State where the OUN pledged to work with Hitler and then did a pogrom in Lviv. Here's the receipt, as they say.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Act_of_restoration_of_the_Ukrainian_state

I also didn't make up the fact that the Solidarity Collectives platform those fascists' flag. Receipt:

https://www.solidaritycollectives.org/en/annual-report-of-solidarity-co…

I asked a question, are you and the army anarchists in Ukraine okay with this? Because if you are, you're not against fascism, you're pro-fascism. And this just scratches the surface of this shit in Ukraine and its army.

Billy (not verified) Fri, 07/17/2026 - 08:40

In reply to by Malatester (not verified)

No? Obviously? Nobody here is ok with that.

What do you expect Ukrainians to do?

"Oh the murderous genocidal fascist invaders killing us to steal our resources who have abducted children and sold them on 'domestic help' (slavery) websites in Russia, who have put our people in 'education' camps, who are going to keep killing us until they take over and steal what little we have left, who are shooting us and killing civilians and stealing our houses and giving them to Russians, who have EVEN more neo Nazis in their army and Wagner group, and who behave as Nazis towards us - we better just let them do this because there's a small amount of fashcrap on our side like there is in literally EVERY PART OF THE WEST and the rest of the fucking world.'

https://english.nv.ua/nation/russia-creates-online-catalog-for-selling-…

That is what Russia is doing.

There is not a people on Earth that you cant find right wing people in. Not one. It doesn't exist.

My own country has plenty of fascists. The country below me has them too. So does the ones to the West and the east and the north and the south and any direction you look except space, but who knows... If my country is dissolved and becomes a part of another it will still have them.

Your country, or if you prefer, the place on planet earth where you live that is called whatever it is generally called, it has them too.

There are probably fascists or fascist sympathizers living within a few mile radius of most humans on planet earth. You've probably been served in a shop or paid a plumber that would if it came down to it goose step.

I get a strong sense from reading the way some people talk about this conflict that they think it's a videogame and something you can just select a form of moral purity from a distance.

It's not. It's a war. In war you face these choices. Kill or be killed. In war you have to win or die. A part of winning means working with anyone who is going to help you.

This is the horror of what is happening.

If I am getting the shit kicked out of me and the guy that comes over and scares off or beats up the people doing it is a right winger, am I going to reject their help? Nah. Sorry. Nope.

This is a war and it's rare that there is ever a war with more moral clarity about who is in the wrong.

Many Russians have recognized this. They have switched to fight for Ukraine or sabotaged trainlines. They have been tortured and murdered in Putin's jails. Anarchists, Christians, people of whatever political, ideological, secular or religious persuasion.

Im sure some of these people don't share my views on trans rights etc. so. what.

When there are fascist Invaders the point is to stop them. You work with anyone who is doing the right thing. We don't sit there and come up with ideological purity tests when there's not enough manpower. You do that if you want to lose.

So all this crap being talked trying desperately to claim someone can't be an anarchist because they don't fight in the perfect impossible fantasy way that isn't possible in reality... whatever.

If a bunch of right wingers are doing the right thing and fighting the good fight then they're proving they can redeem themselves. Maybe afterwards they won't, who knows. I don't know.

What matters is the actions, not the labels, not the identities or philosophies or hashtags.

I don't personally see any of those latter things as static, absolute and even fully present or coherent ideas in the minds of those who embody them.

This stuff doesn't come before stopping fascist invaders. It doesn't and it shouldn't be allowed to.

Nobody in Ukraine has the power to magically politically purify everyone else who lives there and never will.

anonymous (not verified) Fri, 07/17/2026 - 10:13

In reply to by Billy (not verified)

*facepalm* You're using an obvious nationalist propaganda outlet as your source, dude... You're sinking to lower depths. Anyways send us Mariana Trench pics when you get there.

Malatester (not verified) Fri, 07/17/2026 - 12:45

In reply to by Billy (not verified)

"Nobody here is ok with that."

Well, obviously the Solidarity Collectives are ok with it or they wouldn't have posted it and kept it up. Or is your argument that the states of Russia or Ukraine are forcing anarchists in Ukraine to platform and regurgitate Ukrainian Nazi propaganda and paint and post tributes to Russian Nazis like Sergey Petrovichev? You have a lot to say about Ukraine for the very little awareness you show of the connections between Nazis and anarchists there.

Billy (not verified) Fri, 07/17/2026 - 14:14

In reply to by Malatester (not verified)

No you fucking idiot. It's been brought to attention, as it should be, it's not been hidden.

Jfc nobody is perfect here but one side is clearly the aggressor, clearly the invader, has created a war economy that would collapse without more of this and won't stop until it's forcibly stopped. It has a mountain of its own Nazis and they the ones who started and are fighting the war!

I'm sorry about this fact because it's an ugly brutal fact but this is how it is. There is no anarchist solution that can erase this fact of reality.

Please continue to make things up about what I think forever I guess. Idc.

God damn man, I will never fall for this Russian trap and give up on people fighting fascism because oh look there's some right wing dumbasses on their side, that means we can just dismiss them all. That's not how reality works.

anonymous (not verified) Fri, 07/17/2026 - 14:37

In reply to by Billy (not verified)

billy, 90% of the folks here (maybe more) would stop disagreeing with you if you'd just agree that joining a state military is not anarchist. doesn't make it the wrong thing to do, just makes it not anarchist.

if you can' address that and continue just repeating your same points, than i will accept that your'e some kind of bot, and we can all move on.

Billy (not verified) Fri, 07/17/2026 - 15:26

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

Well I won't.

This is about trying to deny an anarchists identity/beliefs because when she faced fascist invasion she worked with the state.

She was not in a position to abolish the state. Nobody there is.

I won't ever say someone stops being an anarchist when they have x job or work in y role or work with z because we all do that. We can't even extricate ourselves from the state in our everyday lives 90% of the time

anonymous (not verified) Fri, 07/17/2026 - 17:25

In reply to by Billy (not verified)

This is where you fail, dude. Being the citizen of a country, and benefiting from state-provided programs where they exist, doesn't make one an *agent* of the state. Even relatively obeying to its laws (like most people and even many anarchists do) doesn't even make you one.

Just being "part of the state" doesn't mean you're fighting for it, and collaborating with it against other people, like the police and military does. That's a stupid "but you use the internet!!!" logic fallacy.

Malatester (not verified) Fri, 07/17/2026 - 15:33

In reply to by Billy (not verified)

It's a matter of fascism being praised at the highest level, by Zelensky himself when the Nazi Melnyk was reburied recently, when military units are given honorary Nazi names by Zelensky, etc, not just "some right wing dumbasses."

Sometimes Nazis fight each other. See the Night of the Long Knives. Russia's fascists don't cancel out Ukraine's, and some Russian fascists are fighting for Ukraine because they see more potential in a NATO-backed fascism than in a Russian fascism. That's just how reality works. You don't get to point at Nazis in Russia and absolve your own Nazis in Ukraine and the rest of the world. You're not against fascism, you're just against Russia. Some of us are against fascism everywhere.

anonymous (not verified) Sat, 07/18/2026 - 07:43

In reply to by Billy (not verified)

again, you're misreading,maybe intetionally. people are attempting to explain to you that while you may not want to support nazis (as an example of something most people would not want to do), that you are in fact supporting people who you strongly disagree with (presumably) and who would not mind killing you (and the rest of us). 

but wayne price is on your side. surely you take some comfort from that. 

Billy (not verified) Sat, 07/18/2026 - 09:11

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

I'm not supporting them, whatever that word even means in regards to people I don't know in a place far far away from me.

The agenda coming through on this replies is obvious though.

I'm done. This is the last time I'll reply to this. Enjoy your last word. Anyone else can read this if they want and make up their own mind.

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
#
P
W
8
#
&
P
!
Enter the code without spaces.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.