not at all. relations are all there are. the relations that make up earth, the universe are not governed by the human mind.
the model of reality is not reality. separations are merely conceptual. how many notions don’t exist outside of the human mind?
being non-ideological allows room back in for intuition, and ‘reading signals from the outside,’ from the living space all creatures share and is the PRIMARY organizing influence of life on this planet. our language stucture orients our beliefs away from treating space as more than a non-actor, non-participant in orchestrating, actualizing, and sustaining life (a continuum without beginning or ending) as an ongoing process we are situated within. the inhabitants and the habitat make up one dynamic.
what’s allowed to come into play without ideology is ‘and/both’ thinking, or ‘the logic of the inclusional third,’ taken over ‘either/or’ thinking. ‘either/or’ thinking leaves out negative causality. one can believe in capitalism, and endless growth as the head of a lumber company. BUT, nothing grew. what was once a forest has been transformed into bald earth. aka, there are externalities to every ideology. every single one.
see, i like “non-ideological” but fear that it might be a mere pretension of being “above the noise”
i like some of what you’re saying and it kinda makes sense
but my paranoid spidey sense kinda feels the trace of a scent, an aura on the UV spectrum that colors your words with traces of philosophical and ideological precepts.
not that that’s a big bad no-no that you must purify yourself from. precisely the point is that we can try to be clear-headed and not delusional, none of us are exempt or invulnerable to bullshit
I think you mean emiley.
Ok emile, come out from behind the curtains, there is always subjective reality.
I don't really mean that by it, but, I ultimately can't quite express what I do mean by "non-ideological". I do agree with the general sentiment of what you're saying, though.
you know, i meant to say “i don’t like feeling swept...”
but the meaning of the version with the omission still makes sense in relation to what was being said above it.
see, i might not like feeling helpless to things beyond my control, but it’s happening all the time
I see what you mean. I did mean to imply that such notions pose a danger concerning agency. I'm still a little enchanted by collecitve euphoria, though. As much as I would be critical, I still kind of like that people can somehow come together to create a better world. Idrk what I'm really on about beyond that tbh.
Has anyone ever seen the film, La Jetée?
i did once, lol why?
I was just curious.
Is that the arty-farty French porn movie with jets of you know what?
That's right... The official cut is only a bit more than 20 minutes while in fact it was an hour and a half of hairy, gnarly '60s porn with suspicious fetish like scat and other devious shit.
More information about text formats