lol

Topic of the Week - I personally don't take explicit participation in totw threads as a sign of either success or failure. There have been too many thoughtful and provocative topics raised over the years--topics that got little to no engagement--and by too many people, to think that explicit, written responses are the best, much less only, measure of success. That's not even talking about other writings, like thread posts here and on other forums like antipolitics.net (long may it linger), etc. 

But of course it's nice when a topic gets a conversation started here, where we can learn more about what we (singly and sometimes together) agree on and disagree on and how to talk about it and how not to talk about it (that last has many examples, obviously, but still...), and why some of us do things and/or don't do things. 

So, in the interest of having us think about why we do/n't do things, what is your thought of what makes a good topic of the week, and for extra thinking, what makes a good post? Do you like a pithy short question, open to interpretation so you can take it where you want? Do you like a fleshed out question more likely to lead you to a place you might not have gotten to on your own? Do you not care what the comment thread includes, and just want to hear what the podcast conversants have to say about it? Is it more fun to respond to something when you're clear about what you think, or when you're trying to figure something out? What causes you to actually imagine or ponder how something would or has happened in your life, ie to apply it to your own experience? 

 

XD

Comments

anonymous (not verified) Mon, 08/24/2026 - 20:15

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

Nah.... The decline started with the all-time classic "Asking Questions While Walking Outsir".

So ever since, we might be having a global nukular war erupting, and some carefree fool from Academiastan will still be posting a TOTW about Sports for Anarchist, or "Availability for Dummies", or something.

anonymous (not verified) Tue, 08/25/2026 - 09:20

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

Was a typo for "Asking Questions While Walking Outside" TOTW, but likely it's no longer around due to past Anews server outages and a lot of the database being lost?

anonymous (not verified) Tue, 08/25/2026 - 18:32

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

"Best of " is not in the direction we should direct our scrutiny, but it was interesting. I thought last weeks was good, semiotics is, after all, "what it's all about". I'm sounding like a salesman for a multinational tech corporation, but I will dash that accusation with this astounding artiste semiotician's criticism ---
Has the AI cell phone replaced the rosary as the unifying myth enslaving the masses?----

anonymous (not verified) Wed, 08/26/2026 - 10:02

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

Nope. AI's a mental crutch for the same normie dumfucks who thought Zuckerbot offered great solutions to make their social lives better.

I'm starting to fall into line with Nietzsche on the need for a new aristocracy. Save with a major correction on his failed beliefs: not an aristocracy of Artistes (sorry!)... but one strictly for AUTONOMOUS beings. i.e. ppl who'll rather do and THINK the shit by themselves, instead of depending on others (physical or not) to do shit.

Artists nowadays are just a bunch of privileged producers of spectacle for the system. They do create useful abstractions, but as distractions away from the torture of daily life.

anonymous (not verified) Fri, 08/28/2026 - 09:19

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

Umm, I'm old school artisté/poet, I lie in the gutter but my eyes see the cosmos,,,I am not churning out useless abstractions, I'm more like a poor unknown Banksy, just sayin'

totw enjoyer (not verified) Mon, 08/24/2026 - 20:06

all totw are good but, the anarchistier, the gooderer.

anonymous (not verified) Wed, 08/26/2026 - 04:52

To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of their women!

Wait, what was the question?

anonymous (not verified) Sat, 08/29/2026 - 21:23

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

I might have posted this already but "ressentiment" is just the French word for "resentment". Or a sassy academic way of calling it. Perhaps some popular translator of Nietzsche used "ressentiment" in order to sound astute, but the two words mean the exact same thing. It is a reverse anglicism (...there's apparently no word for the English equivalent).

Quit using it, that makes you sound like wannabe intellectuals from the outside.

anonymous (not verified) Sun, 08/30/2026 - 03:46

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

I used the Neechian terminology because it has a unique meaning, like many other words. Like "lust" for instance, -having a lust for life-, or - lusting for one's mother's loins- are 2 totally difference meanings, anand in Neech's meaning it carries the explanation for the origins of morality and the suppression of the unique individualist ubermensch.
So you morons who think it means -- The French peasant resents the English because their cuisine is boring--- must be a very boring person to have a conversation with. You fools,,,

anonymous (not verified) Sun, 08/30/2026 - 07:31

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

The definition in English and French are the exact same thing, regardless. But dictionaries are boring!!! Better be sticking some academic translator's glossary instead for bonus wannabe-intellectual etiquette points. After all there's an aristocracy to build!

anonymous (not verified) Sun, 08/30/2026 - 16:17

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

Yes, yEs, YES! These damn boring weak peasants with their addictions, their amour habite, their le fatale obsessione. Viva le revolutionaire,,,
Also, with the 25 year anniversary of La Trading Tower debacle, the horrors of binary warfare within the dualistic universe should be TOTW next week.
Well, I have exhausted my intellect enough on all you illiterates, adios seniors and seneritas,,,

anonymous (not verified) Sun, 08/30/2026 - 19:51

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

Sort of agree if you mean Trumpian supporters as being the intellectual "peasants'.
Nothing can be gained by revisiting 9\11.
Resentment [ressentiment] is no big deal, it's an innate human emotion, competition between hungry siblings can either be tamed or unleashed, it's a parental responsibility, but Neech was never a father nor a hero for the family institution, much like Stirner. Maybe they are the ones who actually lack a nuanced interpretation of collective psychology?

anonymous (not verified) Sun, 08/30/2026 - 20:52

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

I don't recall (someone correct me if I'm wrong) Neech saying anything against resentment... The slave morality has rather got to do with being based upon a resentment. Instead of an affirmation of being, or liberty, it is driven by, like, hatred for those who "STOLE our 'lection", or "STOLE ur cuntry", "STOLE our jobs/wives", or "mimigrants gunna STEAL our kids" or whatever the likes.

The übermesch assert themselves, even against unlikely conditions. Their drive is to surmount the limitations of existence, and assert their power. This includes a will to gain more knowledge, more understanding, ergo science.

I knew a blind man who had built a house on his own, just with partial help from a relative. That is Will to Power. City council assholes who would have enforced regulations against him for this (thankfully this happened before the housing regulations epidemic), they're the slaves of resentment. They seek to control and limit those who're being creative.

anonymous (not verified) Mon, 08/31/2026 - 08:28

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

NooOoo, ressentiment is nOt an innate human emotion, it is an acquired malignant cultural control mechanism used by weak and whining sheeple steeped in victimhood and jealousy. Neech and Max were polygamous free love advocates and not irresponsible hedonistic bachelors, and loved children. Max was a teacher in a girl's school.
You are the one lacking in a nuanced interpretation of Neech's "ressentiment"

anonymous (not verified) Mon, 08/31/2026 - 18:19

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

Too bad for u to not get basic human psychology... Resentment exists since very early childhood. Is it innate? What in humans is really innate?

BIG QUESTION for a bird brain like you, I knows! So let's keep it simple, stupid. Resentment is part of human development whether you like it or not. Fantasizing about some acausal utopian world where you can rob & rape in broad daylight and then keep your friends and get away with it? Well, be patient, son.

anonymous (not verified) Tue, 09/01/2026 - 16:41

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

Huh, I don't fantasize about acausal Utopian worlds, that's a spook, I live and think in the moment. What kind of brainwashed academic creep are you who dreams about property and rape all day? I'm glad I'm a simple Stirnerian/Neechian fool!

CalvinSmith Sat, 08/29/2026 - 18:29

You seem to think that if I think a TOTW is good for one moment, then I always think it's good, and somehow my positions are part of my anarchist identity, and there's actually some ground work to be gained by TOTWs. Most of these topic of the weeks pretend to invite honest introspection in a space that's historically redundant and kinda repressive (as if i'm supposed to appease "anons" that do not give a fuck about me and never will unless I do some crystal meth motorcycle stunt).

"good posts" and "good topics" are just sentiment based, and trying to come up with some moral around them to base future actions is really fucking boring. If i say something is a "good point" or a "good essay", it's just one way for me to say "i currently like this" with fewer words.

I guess if I had to torture myself to find a "good" in these conversations, if they're thoughtful, entertaining, and original, then that's what I'm going to end up reading more carefully.

anonymous (not verified) Sun, 08/30/2026 - 09:10

post more questions about polarizing shit. it’s good, it’s not “making the site decline” to clarify and develop discourse.

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
Z
G
K
7
X
Q
Z
U
Enter the code without spaces.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.