Add new comment

Except there was no earlier time when the student movement wasn't in the bureaucrats pockets. Have you ever been a student union exec? I was. Even when it's carried for "good" reasons that connect to real issues, the student bureaucracies -both the formal and the less formal- are those setting up the stage, initiating the dance.

But my point was also that these movements are not needed, and reliance upon The Movement is in itself a source of political alienation. People can do shit on their own -no matter the numbers, it's a question of quality not quantity!- and find ways to let others know about it if deemed necessary. That is the true character of anarchist insurgency, imo.

Camatte was one of the rare instances of a Marxist theorist who ended up realizing that the dead horse of marxist theory is no longer "alive", but is rather part of capitalist society's merry go-round. This happened during the 20th century. Earlier in the U.S. and Europe and later in Canada. There were wildcat worker strikes back in the '70s in eastern Canada, and they were focused on resisting the State integration of the labor unions. The "workers" are active (and aggressive) agents of the capital. You appear to be an essay addict, I don't get how you didn't read from him already, but that's one of the most important essays to read if you're into that plane of sociology of resistance.

And stop thinking about "penetrating", for the love of... lol I hope you don't need a puppet theater to explain you what pragmatism is, even in the context of analyzing social dynamics. Also it is not to be confused with that other thing, political realism.