Submitted by DoubleLife (not verified) on Fri, 10/25/2019 - 04:28
Is that it's a very thorough critique of hierarchy and all the weaknesses/stupidities that stem from it.
Emma Goldman had a big audience because people of the era were more ready to hear a plethora of criticisms of the powers that be. The people were relatively "un educated politically". Since her there have been rapid info exchange advances and people are more often under a democratic illusion that they understand things.
And of course leftists have monopolized on rebellious thought, but this is just another mass-media political nuetralization game.
We shouldn't need speakers when were still able to speak...if someone rejects the idea that they are free to do as they please, well fuck em
Is that it's a very thorough critique of hierarchy and all the weaknesses/stupidities that stem from it.
Emma Goldman had a big audience because people of the era were more ready to hear a plethora of criticisms of the powers that be. The people were relatively "un educated politically". Since her there have been rapid info exchange advances and people are more often under a democratic illusion that they understand things.
And of course leftists have monopolized on rebellious thought, but this is just another mass-media political nuetralization game.
We shouldn't need speakers when were still able to speak...if someone rejects the idea that they are free to do as they please, well fuck em