Add new comment

SirEinzige
I'll give you my proposal/idea

Mind you it's more of a second hand approach on my part because I do not intend to practice politics but for those that do...

Consider returning to some pre-ww1 elective positions and proposed solutions. The right is basically taking on what are now old and played out 20th century positions on things like national protectionism and national production side economics. I say break out some Benjamin R Tucker and Pierre J Proudhon and re-conceptualize some of their polyecon positions for a 21st century exist strategy. I say exit strategy in the context of Albert O. Hirschman's ideas on exit, voice, and loyalty. Libertarian and anarchist ideology has to be exit based if it is to be anything. You have things like blockchain machinology and cryptocurrency that can make this much more attainable then you could in Pierre and Benjy's time(though the scientific managed statist infrastructure REALLY makes things hard as compared to the 19th and early 20th century).

These are things that can be done. One of the few good things about the IDpol neolib libleft is their sudden embrace of open borders and anti-protection. This COULD be a good thing if you re-conceptualize it in neoclassical libertarian ways.

Those are my thoughts for some preferable general ideological positions regarding things like stealthy secession and exit.

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
i
w
z
4
9
^
T
!
Enter the code without spaces.