Add new comment

Done before you started? Many of us don't have access to Corrosive Consciousness. It's confusing what you even still agree of what you wrote there if we did. The only critique of substance you have seems to be that nihilism to you means a rejection of ll -isms, and that the "righteous violence" (Bellamy) of the eco-extremists is a contest over who is more nihilistic, and is "theological", "revolutionary", "reactionary", and "total moralism" (Bellamy).

Are you not embracing spiritualism and some elements of what's sometimes called reactionary anarchism yourself at this point?

Has Bellamy read into eco-extremism much at all? How about others here? Or did everyone stop after the accusations of fascism and Atassa controversy? For example, have you read any of the Regresion journal? Atltlachinolli: Eco-extremist Dialogues (where J. Jacobi debates them)? Eco-extremist reflections? Invocation? Chichimecas of War? What about Chahta-Imas writing? Eco-extremism seems to have more in common with postanarchism, antihumanism, and animal studies than anything Bellamy has asserted it's about in the past. The ethics of eco-extremism is still an interesting field of inquiry and discussion could continue. Can anti-humanism have an ethic when morality is a wholly humanistic concept?