Add new comment

20:21 here. As Tarantino said, cinema can be put into 2 broad descriptions, Movies or Films. There can be an intersection between the different schools of aesthetics, which pleaes the most people most of the time. Lets face it, actors like to get paid these days, revenue drives the industry, freelance amateur cinema stays makes it to youtube and makes money 1 per million maybe, and often look like crap. Good a tors are drawn to Hollywood, and the whole industry is parodied beautifully in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, but you'd have to be up on the 60s to laugh at the Bruce Lee segment. Pure joy to watch, script, acting, it deserves all the compliments its received. Now take political masterpieces, these are Films, not Movies for the masses, usually starting from books, like 1984, or the unknown ùnderrated THX 1138, or the more recent Snowpiercer, which combined the visceral desperation of apocalyptic futuristic scenarios with the old Marxist class warfare narrative, allegorical in its description òf the authoritarian hierarchical State. We are all in the end carriage, 99% , we've known this for centuries, for millenia. Revolutions come and go, like lemmings, Nature just chews us up and spits us out, and what do we remember, only from a photo of someone who meant something to us, who we felt for. Let them have their wealth and palaces, look at Priince what's his name and Meagan, even they know that this false hierarchy is ending. Scifi is about not having the alienation of the alien, of not being from Mars, Bowie's deliberate reversal of identity, to defeat the capitalist human's, who are the real aliens to the future of this world.