Add new comment

We got some mails following this post, asking whether our "queer, anti-civ insurrectionary anarchy perspective is coming from a tiqqunist/communization theory perspective, or an individualist/anti-left/anti-communism perspective." and just wanted to clear this up.

Fuck appelists/tiqqunists- out here they perform the roles of 'cop' and 'controller' and want to turn all kinds of individual revolt/destitution into their own pet commune project so no we are not with them, and never will be.

Neither are we communizers, we are for the abolition of civilization, and search critiques which have an eye to the totality of civilization (which predates capitalism). Communizers fail to see this totality in favour of adopting a marxist perspective routed in 'fuck capitalism' rather than 'fuck civilization'. Where we see a slither of use in communization is in the perspective of self abolition/identity abolition and it is for this reason that we share/utilize some texts from this trajectory/

We are against leftism/left unity and collective organization, and posit affinity/individual action as our priority.

We are not strictly individualists on a philosophical level though, as we feel that some tendencies within individualism especially those or sternerite and egoist perspective, tend to elevate the existence of self/self hood and entrench the existence of 'the individual'. something which as nihilists primarily and identity abolitionists we find hard to stomach.

In search of co-combatants

D&E