Add new comment

"Under anarchist-socialism, once everyone rules, no-one rules. When all are empowered then no one will have power--in a classless, stateless, society. "

a classless, stateless society - which, since you apparently only see one society - is clearly MASSive society. if you seriously think it is feasible to have a single society of many billions, that is classless and stateless, and without some form of overarching control and coercion, you are far more delusional than any individualist i have ever conversed with.

if your goal is to bring everyone - or even many/most - under a single way of living and relating, then you are not only authoritarian, but less "realistic" than even the ideological primitivists that would also be ok with dictating how EVERYONE lives. (at least they acknowledge the inherent hierarchy and authoritarian relations of mass society.) any "solution" (as if there is one) that presumes mass society, is imo already doomed to "failure". and fyi, i am not a primitivist, or a nihilist, or an indivualist, or anything-ist. i am me, and my worldview might include aspects of any and all ideologies that make sense to me. there are even aspects of social anarchy that are appealing.

progress is subjective.