Submitted by anon (not verified) on Thu, 03/12/2020 - 16:56
the piece on individualism, that one was flat out hegelian to the point of being un-intelligable.
However, this piece also makes similar mistakes:
"Thus, the refusal of identity is an integral part of the process of becoming Unique, freed from the grasp of language and symbolic thought altogether, that is, being itself: union with the One, with the Real beyond being and essence."
Union with the One?! I can't decide if that's more absurd and la-la land than "true gender nihilist". There's no such thing. Period. There is no true gender nor true nihilist.
the piece on individualism, that one was flat out hegelian to the point of being un-intelligable.
However, this piece also makes similar mistakes:
"Thus, the refusal of identity is an integral part of the process of becoming Unique, freed from the grasp of language and symbolic thought altogether, that is, being itself: union with the One, with the Real beyond being and essence."
Union with the One?! I can't decide if that's more absurd and la-la land than "true gender nihilist". There's no such thing. Period. There is no true gender nor true nihilist.