Add new comment

I was talking about how the affinity group has been brought in opposition or competition with the more above-ground gatherings.

Affinity groups are necessary for security reasons, I don't deny that. Yet they fail at being an expandable model of social networking for the same reasons.

And what defines this "affinity" is another issue as well. My contention comes from witnessing plenty of petty-bougie anarchoids who're all about affinity groups, yet this affinity eventually equated with a class affinity...