Add new comment

I don't get why "Bats Transmitting Fire" in the article claiming responsibility released this patronizing article when the most they accomplished was catching part of a room on fire and melting a few cables. People in France have been trying to destroy or light relay antennas on fire for months prior to what "Bats Transmitting Fire" did on may 17-18. Those other French aren't really open with ratting on themselves and claiming responsibility for trying to destroy relay antennas. Ironically enough, "Bats Transmitting Fire" intention seems like they were just trying to receive attention for their patronizing article. They bought in the addition of assisting the authorities in determining the groups in France that've tried to damage and destroy antennas prior to "Bats Transmitting Fire" arriving on the scene running there mouths by writing an article about how they did minimal damage to a relay antenna.

People in Canada, US and UK that have actually caught entire towers and relay stations on fire the past few months and haven't really staked claims of responsibility. The most you'd get out of them is the 5G corona-conspiracy regardless if they believe that. The sheer number of people that ironically or unironically talk about destroying 5G corona-cellphone towers and relay stations is huge and narrow down.

Claiming responsibility, bragging and writing patronizing articles about doing minimal damage to relay antennas & stations does absolutely nothing for "Bats Transmitting Fire" professed beliefs/cause. There are times when claiming responsibility for some act can be beneficial and easily turned into propaganda. However, "Bats Transmitting Fire" causing minimal damage to relay antennas that barely affected people is not one of those times to claim responsibility and write articles.

Cool copy pasta questions from sites like okcupid and peoples blogs