Add new comment

I think the schematisation you're proposing is maybe of a certain use it seems, even i'm sceptic about it.

I think, the thing you're posing is that you can ally with left and right which so far is logical - seen from this schema. But what if you cannot ally with any of them?

Personally i'm not against doing stuff with any people in certain situations. But the problem is, i think, with for example antilockdown protests, or protests in general, that you are moving in a political field, and in their field. I think proposition is direct action against domination, so excludes all politics and all progromic situations.

Personally, to "work" together with political organisations i'm totally opposed, and i would differ between rank-and-file people that are part of an organisation, and working together with them as individuals moving beyond party, or working with them as member of this or that. I thinkt this is an important aspect. I think the destruction of all hierarchical organisations should be the aim. So to create a dynamic of people against also the hierarchical institutions they themselve use(d) to propose and reproduce.

Left anarchists are ugly and the "radical left" prooved worldwide to be the left wing of capital during lockdorn. Political Correctness is absurd and i think that people who want to create their perfect milieu can do so, but leave us alone. And if they ally with authoritarians, which is what happens most of the times, there should be hostility.

Anyway: i think the so called "apolitical" people are more interesting for revolt than organized left- and rightists...