a. playing the game "who is that anon" can be done privately or in public
b. if it's done in public, then you're inviting other people (including the guessee) to play with you, but also inviting others to play, potentially in the name of the guessee, which has all sort of other (possible) ramifications
c. it's a latently aggressive act (if someone posts as anon, usually ? it's for a reason? maybe not. maybe it's just as often by mistake or laziness...) by refusing to let anonymity speak for itself
d. it's also that incorrigible human trait of looking for patterns, and finding them even where they don't exist (edit: no wait, there is a pattern, it just doesn't mean what it seems to mean - so that's about misattributing meaning)
there are more but that's enough for now.
and no, to answer your question. i'm not the only one who would like people to address content meaningfully, thank the great godds below (assuming i'm correct in the post you're attributing to me).
a. playing the game "who is that anon" can be done privately or in public
b. if it's done in public, then you're inviting other people (including the guessee) to play with you, but also inviting others to play, potentially in the name of the guessee, which has all sort of other (possible) ramifications
c. it's a latently aggressive act (if someone posts as anon, usually ? it's for a reason? maybe not. maybe it's just as often by mistake or laziness...) by refusing to let anonymity speak for itself
d. it's also that incorrigible human trait of looking for patterns, and finding them even where they don't exist (edit: no wait, there is a pattern, it just doesn't mean what it seems to mean - so that's about misattributing meaning)
there are more but that's enough for now.
and no, to answer your question. i'm not the only one who would like people to address content meaningfully, thank the great godds below (assuming i'm correct in the post you're attributing to me).