Add new comment

Stirner really is made more for unelective anarchy without the ist/ism. He mentions anarchy along with selfhood and lawlessness which is preferable terrain for the egoist as opposed to the law order and limited freedom of liberalism.

Again the term anarch is the better term an extended Stirnerian theoretical language. Anarchism was made by political economic ideologues. The Stirnerian can still have a relationship with anarchism but a substructural one that is compatible but parallel to it. The fact that the crapformist crapflame type anarchism is so prevalent shows that there is something in the structure of anarchism that brings that out to the point that a post-left break off from elective anarchism is needed. Anarch after anarchist anarchy after anarchism.