Add new comment

is the first couple of paragraphs are not at all at odds with what stirner was saying:

"One important starting point is that we cannot be more free by having fewer connections or fewer responsibilities."

striner actually wrote in the writings of "stirner's critics" that getting outside of yourself to free yourself would also be in the benefit of egoism...however, the author of this booklet is saying something much more absolutist above. In reality, it all depends on the context and the situation. Sometimes severing connections is very liberating, for example, a dickhead boss, shitty and demanding families, etc. Sometimes it's best not to burn bridges as well and try to improve the shitty connections you already have in a selfless way.

According to the writer of the anti-stirner text, severing connections CANNOT liberate us! Looks like the oppressed need to ad to their shitty repertoire of servitude and altruism rather than grow an increased trust of one's own desires and egoism...another critique of the last chapter is vague spewing of the concepts of "interdepence", "freedom", "domination" without explaining what they mean. TLDR all of it.