Add new comment

Is that it is not congruent with Trump's historical power ambitions which are essentially building and maintaining capitalist legacy wealth. Why would he risk a Mussolini type ending to end it all? Trump is not exactly a Machiavellian like Benny and the angry dolphin before him. In all honesty this is really just a constructed emergency from the emergent professional managerial class(PMC). The PMC have a plan for the world and it goes back to the responses to energy and ecology limits that came came about in the early 1970s. Trump is a hiccup to this. That doesn't make him any good by any means but let's call a spade a spade.

What anti-historical/political radicalism should be trying to do is get back to authentic everyday discussions such as what were occurring in the mid-late 60s. That is the spot where anti-apolitical individualists anarchists do best. There is a reactionary period coming but it is multi-structural and not local to right wing ideology in the US and the Western World. The It's Going Democrat types just don't get this.

It's a pity that Peter is a part of all this 'cause I otherwise like him and his analysis. I think he's wasting his energy by helping out the legacy left and what are essentially neoliberal adjacent anarchists who's values are informed by the greater IDPol PMC discourse of thinking.