Submitted by SirEinzige on Sat, 10/10/2020 - 08:35
Is that it is not congruent with Trump's historical power ambitions which are essentially building and maintaining capitalist legacy wealth. Why would he risk a Mussolini type ending to end it all? Trump is not exactly a Machiavellian like Benny and the angry dolphin before him. In all honesty this is really just a constructed emergency from the emergent professional managerial class(PMC). The PMC have a plan for the world and it goes back to the responses to energy and ecology limits that came came about in the early 1970s. Trump is a hiccup to this. That doesn't make him any good by any means but let's call a spade a spade.
What anti-historical/political radicalism should be trying to do is get back to authentic everyday discussions such as what were occurring in the mid-late 60s. That is the spot where anti-apolitical individualists anarchists do best. There is a reactionary period coming but it is multi-structural and not local to right wing ideology in the US and the Western World. The It's Going Democrat types just don't get this.
It's a pity that Peter is a part of all this 'cause I otherwise like him and his analysis. I think he's wasting his energy by helping out the legacy left and what are essentially neoliberal adjacent anarchists who's values are informed by the greater IDPol PMC discourse of thinking.
Is that it is not congruent with Trump's historical power ambitions which are essentially building and maintaining capitalist legacy wealth. Why would he risk a Mussolini type ending to end it all? Trump is not exactly a Machiavellian like Benny and the angry dolphin before him. In all honesty this is really just a constructed emergency from the emergent professional managerial class(PMC). The PMC have a plan for the world and it goes back to the responses to energy and ecology limits that came came about in the early 1970s. Trump is a hiccup to this. That doesn't make him any good by any means but let's call a spade a spade.
What anti-historical/political radicalism should be trying to do is get back to authentic everyday discussions such as what were occurring in the mid-late 60s. That is the spot where anti-apolitical individualists anarchists do best. There is a reactionary period coming but it is multi-structural and not local to right wing ideology in the US and the Western World. The It's Going Democrat types just don't get this.
It's a pity that Peter is a part of all this 'cause I otherwise like him and his analysis. I think he's wasting his energy by helping out the legacy left and what are essentially neoliberal adjacent anarchists who's values are informed by the greater IDPol PMC discourse of thinking.