Add new comment

One of the best anarchists I have known called herself a pacifist, so in the knowing of actual individuals who called themselves such, I have shifted my thoughts. It is possible to disagree with an ideological stance and also to not condemn the person holding that stance. Given the violence of the world as it is now, the world I want to see burn, there is some sense in holding a pacifist stance, in not wanting to add to the general violence. Others have called this jettisoning one's ressentiment. I tend towards this stance with the exception of self-defense (self-defense broadly defined). I personally don't think pacifism for the sake of pacifism is any more coherent than violence for violence sake.