Add new comment

that they are more correct, except the problem is that "anarchist moralism" doesn't really exist except in some vague un-defined form acted out through real life anarchist behaviors: call-out culture, anti-colonialist and anti-racist politiking, liberalism, anti-capitalist rationals, etc.

With that comment I originally wasn't trying to bash the eco-extremist, only to point out that their lense for viewing reality pits "humans" in a binary against "nature" or "the cosmos", which simply isn't accurate. Looking at those terms more carefully it's easy to see that it's all part of the same thing, even if the human presence on this planet is mostly just parasitic. There are still a few species of animals which benefit from human beings.