Add new comment

Are you agreeing with the slingshot article?

Three guesses and he first two don't count -- why would I post it if i didn't agree with it? And if you think the Slingshot piece is missing something, please explain.

With any act of supposedly subversive or anti-capitalist vandalism, the physical destruction of property is about five percent of what matters -- the other ninety five percent is communicated with language. If it isn't communicating effectively to people outside of the vandals immediate social set, then the vandalism has failed, regardless of how much glass ends up on the sidewalk.