Add new comment

They finally did. This kind of farce is also performed in China, which arouses fascism. Now I think that nothing can be solved simply in the network debate. Network siege is just what vulgar people are good at. It was a kind of Protestant moral fanaticism, believing that they could do anything because of the belief that "evil holds authority.". Those who do not conform to their morality are likely to be stigmatized and bullied by public opinion because they are complicit with "evil authorities".
This provides the poor with a laissez faire environment in which they become illiterate, and then the economic, legal and technological elites take control of authority. Intellectuals and elites use populism to bring down dissenters, and then, on the other hand, the popular "justice" movement oppresses themselves. This is the American background of "democratic anarchism".
Of course, many people can be bystanders in other countries, but it is also left to the poor to suffer in such an environment. I think it is not enough to rely solely on ideological propaganda, activists and political incitement. But I don't know what to do. My wife and I only have $269 a month, and then I'm fuckin 'worried about Americans, and then I'm ridiculed and insulted. Maybe people should learn to take on their own responsibilities.