Add new comment

This is a much more clever analysis than the tuff insurrecto braggart above you.

A civil war is more likely to get pushed (as it's been already, in a bloody way) by the neofascist reactionaries, and it's not exactly in any anarchist interest to fight such a war.

Even anarchist fighters aren't interested in such warfare, not because they're "cowards", but because the end goal of a civil war is to replace, or restore, a gang to power.

At best a civil war can be a destabilization of a country, but in the case of the US, in the current context of China's hegemony and Russia also pulling the strings, it's pretty fucking dumb to be thinking of the US as a "separate issue". If the US gets destabilized, as it was already, this means "opportunity" for any invasive foreign force. That was the great mistake of the Communards in Paris, as the brutally reactionary enemies at the gates were also German, not just French, as they did their revolution in the context of a military invasion by Bismark's forces.

What is needed as an anarchist insurgency is a pervasive opposition to the tech industrial complex, that is really the superstate currently in charge atm.