Add new comment

this question is not challenging at all, the boring answer is i don't attack.
broken church windows are not an attack.

people that attack or do food drives have the reasons that justifies it for them, or the do it without thinking about it too much.
knowing a place can come from a familiarity of living there for a long time and paying attention, or by doing diligent research.
i'm not enthusiastic about giving homework, whether it be history, sociology, anthropology, urbanism, so that kids can aim rocks at windows. both are pointless and sad activities, only very tenuously connected. does the information heightened the felt high of the thrill with self-righteousness and smugness? i think they felt justified enough.

the balance you seek is for a brilliant essayist, strategist and tactician also be a mentally disturbed reckless hooligan with nothing to lose.

no one is attacking, this is less harsh than erosion, corrosion, and other deterioration and decay that comes about from the environment. there is rhetoric with rocks, ink, vegan burritos. just as valid and laughable as lighting a scented candle to ward off bad vibes, or throwing a coin down a wishing well. i hope the kid that did it had fun and has a nice day, i'm happy it ruined some other people's day, and i will never meet them.