Add new comment

Yes.

Now I will offer my free labor to the author of this piece by pointing out some typos.

Each instance of "tenancy" should be "tendency".

At first I thought this change was intentional, but I suspect it might not be, after noticing other typos.

It says "first and for most", instead of "first and foremost"

"Stalinism and and of class struggle Anarchism." it has an extra "and".

"..must spontaneously, and immediately, undue capitalist society" it should say "undo".

"His theory never cought on..." it should say "caught".

"...rather than it's replacement by communism." it should say "its".

"share holders" should be "shareholders".

"Of coarse", it should say "Of course".

Apart from the typos, some inaccuracies that could be corrected:

"The Anarchist Murray Bookchin..." whether Bookchin is considred or considered himself anarchist can be disputed, so you could say the same sentence while omitting the anarchist qualifier.

Describing communizing theory as "...some kind of new, nihilistic strategy that is designed to not really be a strategy in the first place." is not really accurate, nor makes sense by itself. This can be replaced by a clearer sentence.

With regards to the content, I like that it makes Leninism, vintage "class struggle" anarchism, and communisation theory look bad, by pointing out some of their flaws. I like how it makes anarcho-syndicalism look bad just by being themself.