Add new comment

Perhaps framing my question in terms of practicality is unfair, to only evaluate communisation within the narrow confines of some of their practice.

Gilles Dauvé says that in a in a nutshell communisation is:
The idea is fairly simple, but simplicity is often one of the most difficult goals to achieve. It means that a revolution is only communist if it changes all social relationships into communist relationships, and this can only be done if the process starts in the very early days of the revolutionary upheaval. Money, wage-labour, the enterprise as a separate unit and a value-accumulating pole, work-time as cut off from the rest of our life, production for value, private property, State agencies as mediators of social life and conflicts, the separation between learning and doing, the quest for maximum and fastest circulation of everything, all of these have to be done away with, and not just be run by collectives or turned over to public ownership: they have to be replaced by communal, moneyless, profitless, Stateless, forms of life. The process will take time to be completed, but it will start at the beginning of the revolution, which will not create the preconditions of communism: it will create communism. - from: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/gilles-dauve-communisation#toc2

Is doing communisation projects in the now the revolution? creating communism now, but gradually?