Add new comment

... you see morality in this analysis? that's weird ... I don't. ever wonder what that says about your own perspective?

also, the "oppressed classes" supporting reactionary politics is carefully reasoned through with the opening paragraphs explaining how all this stuff is linked to "motor resonance" or water to fish, if you will. put another way, since power can easily stay mystified, far outside of people's conceptual framework, they never grasp these dynamics in a functional way, reflexively deferring to the power of others in an almost totally subconscious process. this is very easy to see in the wildly different ways that people will interpret videos of police violence, that's not just ideology distorting facts imo, it's more fundamental to how the mind builds its interpretations.

I've often thought that a shallow analysis of power is a glaring weakness of much of the anarchist analysis I see but that's a bit unfair because almost every other position has this problem too. The trick is to have a good analysis of power without being seduced by the will to dominate, something to always be wary of ... and no, I don't think that's just "moralizing" when I say that.