Add new comment

A lot of the currently dominant global system and everyday practices are European/colonial in origin. We need to have serious discussions about which of them are irreducibly dominatory and which are not. The state is inherently dominatory whether or not it has colonial origins, and police were initially designed as an occupying force. But there's a lot of grey areas with other things. For instance, I see discussions about "decolonizing education" which don't seem to recognise that mass schooling is a European-derived system. The idpols recognise that hierarchies of access are racialized and reproduce racial hierarchies, but they're broadly pro-schooling. They see decolonizing in terms of equalizing access and changing the content of curricula and having more POC teachers and so on. I don't see how stuffing a European-derived hierarchical institution full of non-European people and contents is decolonization, but I suppose this is also what largely happened in the countries which were decolonized in the 1950s-60s: local POC officials filled the exact same roles in the same state structures that existed under colonialism, and replaced European content with nationalist content. And I guess that's the limit to decolonization as a metaphor: the anti-colonial revolutions were failed revolutions, they removed the European powers but didn't liberate the people of the South.

Personally I don't think it's very useful to use colonialism and decolonization as a root-metaphor for everything. It makes a lot more sense to me, to think in terms of different ways of life. Indigenous ways of life are/were alternatives to capitalism with non-capitalist economies - subsistence, petty commodity, gift economy, mutual aid, resilience not efficiency - and more immediate social relations and relations to nature which aren't necessarily extractivist or dominating. Rebuilding these kinds of relations, or reinventing new kinds of systems which aren't capitalist or ecologically or socially alienated, is and always was an important part of anarchism. I don't think race has any particular place in this, besides the fact that anarchist communities shouldn't be proactively racist (& in the same way shouldn't be discriminating based on any other spook). Anti-capitalism has a major place because capitalism is today the main way the elites of the North plunder the South, as well as being one of the biggest forms of alienation. But it's also absolutely essential to keep the focus on desire, agency and fighting the system.