Add new comment

"They slit people's throats, burn the homesteads in the fields, embed iron nails in good wood to destroy sawmills, and design explosive devices. They block participation in war and destroy arsenals ...... a group of true supermen with evil superhuman powers, everywhere and nowhere."
This passage is the media's description of anarchists. Some might say that this is enemy propaganda. But, as a propaganda, the super villains in the movie are equally a portrayal from the mainstream values. So, there seems to be a common language and the topic is inevitable.

Super villains are usually portrayed as powerful enemies whose fate is to be defeated by a righteous partner (e.g., a vigilante). While super-villains often have exaggerations and toxic impurities in them, I think it is worth examining. In other words, the invention of the villain is not empty, but has some basis. For example, Hellraiser, the hellish monks' preference for the hedonistic pleasures of flesh and blood is due to the need for mainstream culture to portray an evil. Although these images are often one-sided and scandalized, they point to the fact that there is an evil lurking deep underneath that is constantly being discussed, proliferated and aberrated. It is even a self-made ethic that makes super-villains so happy.

Super-villains are invented not just from mistakes (for example, Bane in Batman, who represents the bad side of the French Revolution), but as characters who make mistakes the mode of pleasure. So they are often not simple characters. If a man makes a mistake, he recognizes his mistake and blames himself. But the super-villain makes a mistake, and he feels happy. In other words, an affirmation of great mistakes is formed. Essentially, this creates a kind of debate. What exactly is evil? What about the realization, hierarchy and style of evil? -- This is from Plato's habit, that evil must have its representation, its rank, its typicality, its style. So there is a constant stream of super-villains being created there. But the question must be asked in turn, is evil really so childish and something like being styled by hairspray?

The power of the super villain is very often to make the story attractive. But if you look deeper you will find that their power is of a completely different type than the protagonist. If viewed through modern eyes, they are essentially powerless and weak, and therefore destined to be defeated by the hero. But if viewed in ancient times, perhaps those super villains may well represent some of the best character. The ancient Greeks were well aware of the emptiness and pain of life, yet Dionysus gave meaning to that pain, and to a large extent, it constitutes what modern people see as evil. It has a masochistic quality - it's like saying that a demon king, most likely, is empty, so he needs brave men to beat themselves up for entertainment. This is the breadth of mind and temperament of a super villain.

Because of the different modes of power, super villains are not destined to be the protagonists of the story. Even, sometimes they are not a person, but a group, a wasp in the desert, a swamp, or a shadow of the protagonist himself. It waits for justice to thwart itself, because it loves everything it has created and likes to have someone to share his joy. However, this joy is not accepted and condemned, which makes the super villain feel sad and upset. Needless to say, the supervillain represents tragedy. Even, he wants to leave the world of justice actively, because he wants people to be happy.

However, this does not mean that the world has thus entered the happy time. Because the righteous world loves self-torture and chastisement so much, suffering fills every corner, so much so that the super-villain once again sheds tears. He just felt sad for the stupidity of people. So he decided to destroy the world, so that people can be happy again in the destruction.