Add new comment

His argument, I mean. If seen through a merely “descriptive” type of lens laying out how the world really works, then what’s wrong with it? At what point do you stop to consider that the natural world isn’t some pink and blue padded playpen for kindergarteners where the lions lay down with the lambs and everyone lives happily ever after. Redbeards book calls on us to summon the moral toughness and spiritual strength to stand up and do single combat with Life on Life’s terms. “Might makes right”, well, maybe you should stop whining and go about acquiring some ‘might’. If you had might, your freedom would naturally follow.

Serious question, what is actually logically wrong or incorrect with that argument?

I’ll wait.