Add new comment

Marxists are for "proletarian internationalism" in theory: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proletarian_internationalism

But, also part of their theory and part of their practice now and in the past, Marxists see nationalist movements as potentially *progressive* movements, capable of creating anti-capitalist states. So they often times wind up creating a form of Left-Wing Nationalism and support National Liberation Struggles, hoping to politically out-maneuver capitalist and right-wing nationalists that also compete for the same demographics. Like the supposed withering-away of the State that Marxists presume will come from transcending the categories of class struggle, they basically believe that nationalism will also wither-away. So their support for nationalism is instrumental and their ultimate goal is the erasure of national identities.

Anarchists have always been critical of this. Although sometimes developing their own ideas about proletarian internationalism, anarchists would never accept the goal of such nationalism as the creation of nation states. And anarchists have also been friendlier to national identities, even though critical of national liberation struggle's aims of state-formation.

This is why anarchist voices are so unique and capable of providing so much perspective when it comes to ethnic nationalist conflicts, like those we are seeing in Israel-Palestine. But that is only if anarchists have the courage to speak as anarchists and center this critical position. Otherwise, as said earlier, anarchists become fuel for Marxist's instrumental use of national liberation struggles... which means we basically hype up a cause that leads to the election of civic nationalists (liberals, capitalists) or left-wing nationalists currently aiming to create their own nation-states, like many of the groups that form the PLO.