sincere question: is A! really saying "those Damn homeless kids dont know REAL anarchy and therefore must be Idpol loving reds"? Or is this a sentiment being expressed by maybe-loosely-affiliated-other-people and getting lumped in with A!'s expressed opinions? I see this happen a lot.
"Have the smallest bit of respect for people and maybe you won't get your shit stolen by people who experience dangerous spaces beyond an abstract concept." <-- is the implication here that dangerous spaces are ones where people steal your shit, like a 'anything goes, no honor among thieves' scenario? Is this supposed to be revenge? Is it supposed to reduce the undesirable behavior in the future?
"Or did the dangerous space idea get interpreted as everyone can do whatever they want without consequence?" <-- I think you're saying here that A! was 'doing whatever he wanted' (i.e. being rude) but how is stealing someone's shit not 'doing whatever they wanted'? Weren't both parties just 'doing whatever they wanted'? So why is one a social transgression worthy of punishment and the other an acceptable consequence? (i.e., how is the answer anything but 'because one party is the ingroup and the other is an outgroup')?
sincere question: is A! really saying "those Damn homeless kids dont know REAL anarchy and therefore must be Idpol loving reds"? Or is this a sentiment being expressed by maybe-loosely-affiliated-other-people and getting lumped in with A!'s expressed opinions? I see this happen a lot.
"Have the smallest bit of respect for people and maybe you won't get your shit stolen by people who experience dangerous spaces beyond an abstract concept." <-- is the implication here that dangerous spaces are ones where people steal your shit, like a 'anything goes, no honor among thieves' scenario? Is this supposed to be revenge? Is it supposed to reduce the undesirable behavior in the future?
"Or did the dangerous space idea get interpreted as everyone can do whatever they want without consequence?" <-- I think you're saying here that A! was 'doing whatever he wanted' (i.e. being rude) but how is stealing someone's shit not 'doing whatever they wanted'? Weren't both parties just 'doing whatever they wanted'? So why is one a social transgression worthy of punishment and the other an acceptable consequence? (i.e., how is the answer anything but 'because one party is the ingroup and the other is an outgroup')?