Add new comment

SirEinzige says the holocaust, for example, is disgusting though not wrong? Not wrong because SirEinzige does not believe in morality. Morality is supposedly a social norm, right? When an action is classed as wrong, it is because it is believed to be bad, universally bad, universally wrong, universally disgusting. Likewise rape and paedophila. How can an action be disgusting and not wrong? Why can't SirEinzige say the holocaust, for example, is wrong, morally wrong? Is human rights seen in a similar light: that morality and rights are can be given and taken away by whoever is the powerful at the time: that morality and rights are subject to time? Yes, there was a time when rape and paedophilia was acceptable (to those perpetrating such acts) but that didn't mean such acts were right, acceptable? Nihilism is the 'belief' in amorality, is this correct? My feeling is that even more despicable acts would be carried out in nihilistic society than in our supposed moral society. Enforcing social norms is a tricky one. Great topic of the week and could be useful for Anarchy Bang to flesh out over a couple of hours?

As for Aragorn! and publishing ATASSA: Aragorn! sees himself as the Malcolm Maclaren of Anarchy USA: A modern-day Situationist...and possibly an attention seeker?