Add new comment

"Is your understanding of power so first-level as to only be seeing the coercion part?"
Your's apparently is. Why did you limit the word "exploit" to only mean "preventing abuse or "crimes" through control measures" when nothing I wrote imposed such a limitation.
No, you're not any better at constructing stawmen than any other dullard.
Exploitation by a third includes "ruse, grooming and restriction to knowledge" and "horizontal peer influence". etc., etc.

Please clarify this, "Doesn't look like a very powerful position agaisnt abusers and other despots." Are you saying that "power over a third party that might try to exploit you and you exercise it to deny them of that ability" is statist and therefore not 'anarchist' whilst also being not "a very powerful position agaisnt abusers and other despots." which should be butressed in order to be more in line with anarchy. Your stance comes across muddled and confusing. Thanks.