Add new comment

A lot of those debates are about whether something is anarchist or not. A lot of the commenters on this site are sceptical of all forms of action - a decade ago, this would not have been considered anarchist, now it is. Their critique has entered the anarchist space. Similarly, a decade ago, there would have been no way anyone organising in the DSA could call themselves anarchist. Its not on this site, but its happened. Perso, anarchy involves eliminating the separation between ideas and their consequences, so if an idea leads to a good democratic life or to one cynically devoid of conflict with the existent, its not anarchist. Contrasting ideas on the level of theory won't reveal this, so more communiques snd less empty talk would help.

That said, "anarchist" isn't a synonym for "interesting", so read what you want.