Add new comment

Replying in good faith to excellent question critiquing my different description for women and men. Likewise I should also word the male section to satisfy the gender fascists obsessive hair-splitting regarding lexical semantics in the following identical manner, hereby erasing the creative poetic flair in the original sentences.
" men should be free and not forced into any binding relationships because they are not property, also, though their personalities and physiological functions and desires are nuanced, women should be free and not forced into any binding reĺationships because they are not property. Also, the homeless guy you took into your van to help with chores in exchange for shelter and food should be free and not forced into any binding relationshipbecause they are not property. Also, the homeless puppy you squeezed into the van should be free and not forçed into any biñding relationship because they are not property. But your lazy husband who bongs too much and is unemployed should be thrown out into the street and be replaced.