Add new comment

I understand the Post-Left's stance on organization. It seems to proceed from Jacques Camatte's On Organization which I, in part, agree with. This could be an anomaly, but, I had recently encountered a Post-Left Anarchist who was against democracy. I think that they were just simply misguided, but, that such a position could be indicative of crypto-Fascist quasi-Third Positionist tendencies, and, would, therefore, not be willing to trust that I, and, such Anarchists could work in tandem, or, in short, that we, being myself and whoever agrees with me, really are "so-called" allies. If there is an anti-democratic bent within the Post-Left tendency, could someone help to clarify it for me? It seems to be the case that "radically decentralized affinity-based relationships" would be a form of participatory democracy. I think that slant against participatory democracy could be resultant from the confusion of the concept as solely being consensus based decision making. Democracy is just engaging in dialogue so as to come to decisions within a community. Participatory democracy can refer to vaguely Platformist consensus based decision making, but, it just simply refers to an emphasis upon broad participation within a democratic project. This can be interpreted as that decisions are decided upon by freely associated groups. The concept does not exclusively refer to what is known as "Platformism".