Add new comment

I guess I see the project of Anarchism as an attempt to bring about some form of participatory democracy. It's not just some thing that people are into. It is more or less just that. If decisions are not to be made through dialogue within groups or communities than I am not sure as to how they are supposed to come about. I fully understand the critique of the historical democratic project and its current manifestation as Liberal democracy, but, I see being against democracy in general as being, at best, either recalcitrant or misplaced, and, at worst, indicative of that a person wants to make an appeal to Fascists. I don't see how Anarchists can agree to operate together when a particular tendency threatens to blight the cause of the general movement. If the Post-Left Anarchists intend placate Fascists with their discourse than they can leave the movement altogether. They can not, however, leave as "Anarchists".

I, of course, do not think that this situation is so dire, and, just suspect for this to arise out of a simple misunderstanding. No limited culture of people that a person meets online is representative of any inclination as a whole. We, again, being myself and whoever agrees with me, which probably consists of myself, just think that this matter should be adressed.

I honestly don't think that crypto-Fascism is as much of a problem within the community as you might expect that I would. I'm sort of just polemicizing. I do mean some of this in partial sincerity, though. I've been accused of being too divisive before and merely wanted to state that if that was the state of affairs that I do intend to be divisive. I don't actually think that that is really the state of affairs, though, and, so, do apologize for being a bit too divisive.