Add new comment

anon (not verified)
"I honestly haven't really

"I honestly haven't really read too many Post-Left texts and don't really claim to know too much about it"
and yet here you are, claiming to know all sorts of things about the discourse. i fully expect this kind of pontificating despite ignorance on the more open pages, but here in the less free-for-all forums it is a little more surprising. relying on rumor, caricature, mischaracterization, and the smears of anarcho-leftists to pass judgement on their ideological opponents is... well, all sorts of negative things, but it all comes down to this: it's not how to engage in an actual discussion, let alone debate.

since you're obviously no longer interested in making dismissive comments about an entire discourse, perhaps you'll deign to read something. here's a specifically post-left critique of morality and moralism that has nothing to do with your misunderstanding that the critique derives from Marxism. it's easy to read and is relatively short.
http://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/jason-mcquinn-demoralizing-morali...

as for the analytical category of Empire, talk about derivatives from Marxism; Hardt and Negri are explicit Marxists and their technophilic and heirarchic absurdities are on full display in their stupid books "Empire" and "Multitude."

tl;dr: do some homework before spouting off and being called on it

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
G
*
Z
C
Z
g
)
y
Enter the code without spaces.