Add new comment

anon (not verified)
the problem is not one of

the problem is not one of agreement.

if a person or group decides to accumulate resources and power, and another decides to not do that, guess what will happen throughout time? The powerful will become more powerful, or at least remain relatively more powerful than those who abstain from that.

of course, this is mere ahistorical manichean oversimplification. but it’s also well known how politicians can promise freedom and good things, while working on the opposite.

we offer nothing and work towards nothing, the results are not surprising, and i don’t disdain them.

can you be a pebble on gov’s shoe? a grain of sand on the state’s eye? evasion may provide a longer life than direct confrontation. compliance gets you what everyone else gets. choose according to your preference.

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
i
(
B
T
d
F
(
q
Enter the code without spaces.