Add new comment

Land can't be owned for one thing, you can go after this canard the way Stirner went after Proudhon accept it's even more obvious as the entire leftist buzzword concept is even more counter sensical. Obviously there was displacement but that's not the same thing as theft.

It really is stunning to see how far the Maoist structured masquerade runs when it comes to bad radical language. Even 'anti-leftists' like Zerzan end up getting affected by it. All the more reason to dispense with uncritical orthodox 1968 language such as 'stolen native land'. Maoism really is syphilis as described by the classical bacteriologists(the great masquerader). It's BS as far as actual science goes but the analogy will do to describe the multi-factorial maoist disease that infects and affects so much radical language.