Add new comment

That would be would be what I'm saying in regards to indigenous groups reifying ownership. What I am counter proposing is the baseline libertarian view that land is lived on not owned. I'm not against using legalistic language and means when you have to, however this should not structure your discourse and identity. A truly non leviathan indigenous approach is to repeat the old cliche that this land is yours and mine which is really to say I live on this land you live on this land. The rest is territorial demarcation and association.

What makes my discourse interesting and stupid to some is that it's new and not derivative of any mainline radical discourse that has been thus presented. There are a few however who get that what I'm saying will register in a more radical future.