Beyond Anti-fascism, But Not Without It

  • Posted on: 22 December 2017
  • By: thecollective

From the Institute for Anarchist Studies

Since Trump’s election, fascism has barged onto center stage, moving more brazenly into public space, mainstream media and public discourse than it has in decades. This renewed and emboldened presence of overt fascism has been met by an explosion of analysis and discussion about its history and politics, and the conditions necessary for its emergence. A proportionally growing attention is also being paid to the history and politics of anti-fascism.

This is welcome, and it is crucially needed. However, it’s also true that the bulk of the writing and speaking on fascism and anti-fascism—the better-selling books, the high-profile interviews–are being done by white men.


Meanwhile, women, queer and trans and communities of color, particularly Black and Indigenous communities, have been experiencing related forms of violence and raw hate for years with full cognizance of the implications. Yet their analysis and resistance has not been accorded the same urgency and attention—even keeping in mind the major tectonic shifts initiated by the Black Lives Matter and No DAPL anti-fossil-fuel pipeline movements, for instance.

(You know, like when a liberal sees something happening and is shocked, SHOCKED! While an anarchist just nods grimly and says “Yeah, that’s what we’ve been telling you this whole time.” It’s often that way with the perspectives of cis-white-male and not-cis-white-male points-of-view too.)

When the first great global anti-fascist Popular Front emerged in the 1930s, Pan-Africanists and Asian anti-colonialists pointed out to their white leftist comrades and allies that what appeared unprecedented and alarming to them when it reared its head in Europe was already long-familiar to those on the wrong side of the color line. The logics of white supremacy, its institutions and systematized practices, the brutal dehumanization (racialization, criminalization) of the “Other,” the violent misogyny, had all been routine components of the apparatus of colonization, conquest, and dispossession. Those logics, rhetorics and practices had merely continued along their obvious trajectories by blossoming into fascism at home, where the shock was that they appeared close by and visited upon “us” rather than far away and visited upon “them.”

Black and brown revolutionaries declared (and proved) themselves ready and eager to step up and join the fight against fascism, while also insisting that these connections not be overlooked; that Hitler, Mussolini and Franco could not be confronted without simultaneously dismantling the British and French empires and the US racial regime, or the whole enterprise would be fatally flawed. Maybe what we’re seeing now shows that they were right.

Italian partisans in Milan, April 1945.

(Italian partisans in Milan, Italy, 1945)

So what about now? What comparable connections need to be stated and foregrounded?

We need analysis and historical contextualization of fascism and anti-fascism, but we also need analysis and historical contextualization of its relationship to longstanding anti-racist resistance and decolonization efforts. We need to talk about how institutionalized forms of white supremacy connect to the racism and imperialism of US world interventions. We need to understand what’s different and distinct about the present moment, while also understanding its intersections and continuities, in order to provide fuller perspective and therefore a more effective ability to fight back.

And for that, we need to be hearing from more people than just white men, who may sometimes miss some of these connections, or may feel unauthorized or unequipped to address them. We need to be hearing more from those who have never stopped experiencing, recognizing, calling out and fighting back against the not-so-dormant forces which have produced this latest crop of malevolent blossoms.

We appreciate those who have laid out their analyses; they are essential to our struggle. And we also need to hear from the rest of the comrades, organizers, writers, and everyday folks. This is happening, and we want to amplify it. (For example, check out the work of Alexis Pauline Gumbs, Dilar Dirik, William C. Anderson and Zoe Samudzi, Robyn Spencer, Upping the Anti collective, among others.)

If you are writing, talking, and speaking out publicly, and if you want another forum for what you have to say, write us at: Whether you only have an idea, or a rough draft that needs work, or a fully formed and polished piece, we’d like to see what you’re thinking and consider it for publication.

~ The Perspectives on Anarchist Theory collective, of the Institute for Anarchist Studies



it’s great for anarchists to reach out beyond the self-imposed restrictions of Eurocentrism, but this call, coming from the official voice of alarmist antifascism, rings hollow; what they’re calling for is material not specific to any geographical context, but to be part of a generalized anti-colonialist/anti-imperialist front. without any challenge to the pro-statist agendas of virtually all anti-colonialists and anti-imperialists, this can easily be construed as a call for the continued subordination of explicitly anarchist analyses and projects with the facile condemnation of being from straight white cismales.

"Those logics, rhetorics and practices had merely continued along their obvious trajectories by blossoming into fascism at home, where the shock was that they appeared close by and visited upon 'us' rather than far away and visited upon 'them.'"

Are there any PoC in the "Perspectives on Anarchist Theory collective"?

I know that Maia Ramnath comes from an Indian background. I don't know about the others though.

Ashanti Alston has been part of their speakers panel. both he and Ramnath are definitely smack dab in the middle of left-anarchism, and are therefore soft on standard pro(to)-statist anti-colonialism...

I always maintain that race and racism is an aesthetic judgement fueled with emotionally excessive envy, and the same could be said about the adoration of a race, all of these concepts are delusionary fetishes and spooks propagated by those full of ressentiment.

"Let the past die. Kill it if you have to." Beyond AND without.

PS TLJ sucked btw.

I'm not surprised so many of yall are choosing the dark side (fucking Stirnerites, all of you), but I am still disappointed. I need to get near some sociopaths to model their minds and regain my darkside skills. But there aren't any sith raves around portland.

Nice spook, NERD! Get THE guillotine! We need Huey P. Newton, not Bernie Sanders!

Paul Z. Simons, a true Anarcho-Journalist who's been to Rojava, sent me an email saying he found some of my work "quite impressive." What has he said about your work, robot man?

Blessed be.

From Dr Fetish, bone-through-nose, dreads, fake 1000 yard stare, spook substitutes for gods, morality to replace taboos.

...and capital to replace what used to be a revolutionary agenda. So quaint. Commies still bigger fakesters than any anarfakes... It's lack of substance for the latter, versus sheer deception for the former.

Add new comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Enter the code without spaces.