New Poster Series: What Does Democracy Mean?

  • Posted on: 29 April 2012
  • By: worker

<table><tr><td>From <a href="

Just in time for May Day, we are excited to debut a new line of posters: <a href=" target="_blank"><strong>“What Does Democracy Mean?” [PDFs 700k]</strong></a> Together, the posters explain how democracy depends upon policing, borders, and other institutions of control. Please print, photocopy, and circulate widely!</p>

<p>We hope that this series will help to clear up lingering confusion about the differences between democracy (a form of government) and anarchy (i.e., freedom). Democracy, even direct democracy, is not the same as self-determination. Democracy is premised on the idea that only one decision-making body should have legitimate authority, while anarchism proposes the decentralization of power: not just horizontality, but also autonomy. Just as anticapitalism has entered public consciousness in the US since we published last year’s <a href=" of anti-capitalist posters</a>, the coming year may see people looking for alternatives to democracy as well. It’s up to us to offer liberating possibilities, since the other alternatives to democracy are even more oppressive.</p></td><td><img title="Alternatives are poop. We offer nothing!" src=""></td></tr></...
<p><a href="" rel="lightbox[dm]"><img src="" /></a><span class="invisible">-</span><br />

<p><strong>What Does Democracy Mean?</strong></p>

<p>Our forebears overthrew kings and dictators, but they didn’t abolish the institutions by which kings and dictators ruled: they <em>democratized</em> them. Yet whoever operates these institutions—whether it’s a king, a president, or an electorate—the experience on the receiving end is roughly the same. Laws, bureaucracy, and police came before democracy; they function the same way in a democracy as in a dictatorship. The only difference is that, because we can cast ballots about how they should be applied, we’re supposed to regard them as <em>ours</em> even when they’re used against us.</p>

<p><a href="" rel="lightbox[dm]"><img src="" /></a><span class="invisible">-</span><br />
<strong><em>Democracy means police.</strong></em> Democracy doesn’t just mean public participation in making decisions. It presumes that all power and legitimacy is vested in one decision-making structure, and it requires a way to impose those decisions. As long as anyone might defy them, there have to be armed personnel to <em>regulate</em>, to <em>discipline</em>, to <em>control</em>.</p>
<p>Without police, there would be <em>anarchy</em>: people would act on their own initiative, only implementing decisions they felt to be in their best interest. Conflicts would have to be resolved to the mutual satisfaction of all parties involved, not suppressed by a gang with a monopoly on force.</p>

<p><a href="" rel="lightbox[dm]"><img src="" /></a><span class="invisible">-</span><br />

<strong><em>Democracy means borders.</strong></em> Democracy presumes a line between participants and outsiders, between legitimate and illegitimate. Only a fraction of the men could vote in ancient Athens; the Founding Fathers owned slaves. Citizenship still imposes a barrier between included and excluded, shutting over 10 million undocumented residents out of the decisions that shape their lives.</p>

<p>The liberal answer is to expand the lines of inclusion, extending rights and privileges until everyone is integrated into one vast democratic project. But as long as all power must flow through one bottleneck, there are bound to be imbalances and outsiders. The alternative would be <em>anarchy</em>: abolishing centralized power structures and all the borders they impose. Without borders, people would only live and work together of their own free will, flowing freely between communities without top-down control.</p>

<p><a href="" rel="lightbox[dm]"><img src="" /></a><span class="invisible">-</span><br />

<strong><em>Democracy means prisons.</strong></em> Those who don’t accept the authority of the state must be isolated, lest their disobedience spread to the rest of the population. We’re told that prisons protect us, but the only constant since their invention has been that they protect the state from those who might threaten it. In practice, by breaking up communities and fostering antisocial tendencies, they only endanger us—even those of us who aren’t behind bars.</p>

<p>Without prisons, there would be <em>anarchy</em>: people would have to work out conflicts directly rather than calling in the authorities, and it would no longer be possible to sweep the inequalities of this society under the rug.</p>

<p><a href="" rel="lightbox[dm]"><img src="" /></a><span class="invisible">-</span><br />

<strong><em>Democracy means surveillance.</strong></em> Democracy presumes transparency: a marketplace of ideas, in which decisions are made in the open. Of course, in an unequal society, transparency puts some people at risk—the employee who could be fired for expressing the wrong opinion, the immigrant who fears deportation—while the powerful can feign transparency as they make back-room deals. In practice, political transparency simply equips intelligence agencies to monitor the populace, preparing reprisals for when dissidents get out of hand—and what government could maintain its authority without intelligence agencies?</p>

<p>Without surveillance, there would be <em>anarchy</em>: people would say and do what they really believe in. Those who defend centralized power fear nothing more than privacy—the keeping of secrets—which they call <em>conspiracy</em>.</p>

<p><a href="" rel="lightbox[dm]"><img src="" /></a><span class="invisible">-</span><br />

<strong><em>Democracy means war.</strong></em> Democracy means constant competition. Just as corporations contend for resources in the marketplace, politicians and governments vie for power. When power is centralized, people have to attain domination over others in order to determine their own destinies. Those in power can only hold onto it by waging war perpetually against their own populations as well as foreign peoples: hence the National Guard troops brought back from Iraq to suppress domestic protests.</p>

<p>As long as we remain at a distance from our own potential, being governed rather than acting freely, being <em>represented</em> rather than acting on our own interests, people will seek power over each other as a substitute for self-determination. The alternative is <em>anarchy</em>: a world in which people fight only for themselves—not for empires, flags, or gods—and conflicts cannot produce hierarchy and oppression.</p>

<h2><strong><em>We have to be tireless in our critique of democracy, as the alternative people in this society intuitively fall back on against the excesses of capitalism. The more unpopular this is, the more important it is that we do it. Private property and government are the two great sacred cows of our age—the ones for which our lives and the earth itself are being sacrificed—and challenging the ways they monopolize legitimacy is one project, not two. They are two heads of the same beast; they cannot be beaten separately.</em></strong></h2>
<p>–<a href="">Nightmares of Capitalism, Pipe Dreams of Democracy</a></p><br>

<p>For more ammunition: <a href=""></a></p>


These are great. A little late for us to make them for Mayday here, though. Damn.

Make 'em for the entire month of May!

These people have done a lot of stuff this month.

crimethinc is building power!

really, they're not doing too bad.

Of course. They don't have jobs and don't organize since they are consummate lifestylists so they can spend all their time churning out garbage like this that isn't the one true way to revolution.

ugh, the anti-crimethinc troll repping his reactionary, apparently snitch-loving website

I bet you have bagel breath.

Do you like our redesign? We're trying to learn from you style obsessed train riding hipsters and diversify our readership into The Youth market.

*you'll never take us alive!!!*
-the yout'

Guys, this is Crimethinc! I'm waiting for the ridiculous criticisms about bagels and trains and smelling bad!

Mayday is still a day away; I know you all aren't rioting yet!

What, you think riots just organize themselves? We're all very busy in our respective committees, sub-committees, and sub-sub-committees, voting on the actions we are going to take, and submitting them to our regional delegates so they can be approved by the national office. It's serious business, you understand.

Can we do an AMA?

What is up with this NYPD report from the RNC that alleges that the leader of CrimethInc. was arrested in Iowa before the RNC and that they were a juvenile at the time?

That old report is so awesome. If memory serves, some other part of it says that the leader of CrimethInc. burned down a school or something when they were like 12. We can't make that shit up.

wait, here it is:

The social worker contacted ______'s mother and asked specifically if her son had ever started any fires.
____'s mother advised that when he was 9 or 10 years old, he had burned a building
______s believed to be responsible for the $300,000 arson at Mountains Edge in Las Vegas).


The FBI knows too much! Hahahaha.

Best. Mom. Ever.

Fuck yeah this is the shit Im fuckin talkin about yeah fuck those smug liberals up now like that fuckin joker gump, fuck that identity up !!






// FREE BEER (best on a vandalized liquor store)


Add new comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
Enter the code without spaces.