Review- ‘Makhno: Ukrainian Freedom Fighter’

From Aotearoa Workers Solidarity Movement Urcuchillay

Authors:Philippe Thirault (Writer)
Roberto Zaghi (Art)
Nanette McGuiness (Translation)

Date:Mar 22, 2022

Edition:Softcover TradeFormat:120 pages – Color
7.6 x 10.2 in

ISBN:9781643379692

Ukraine has become a focus of attention lately due to the war there. For many this will be a temporary and superficial interest, related to the duration of that conflict and media interest in it. Clashes between nation-states and their elites is a deeply saddening feature of today’s world. Such a war brings up the question whether some better alternative is available? There are contemporary alternatives, but its also possible to look at the past for inspiration. In the case of Ukraine, there is a set of interesting historical events that do provide bits and pieces that suggest another way of being.

There was also a war in Ukraine between 1917-21. It was a complex mess and involved various factions competing to control the Ukrainian state. Among them were the Bolsheviks (later misnamed ‘Communists’), Germans, Nationalists and Monarchists. In reaction to this, a movement developed in Eastern Ukraine. It was based on workers and peasants who were fed up with all these different groups claiming to rule over them. Though there were many people involved, over time the main personality the movement threw up was a peasant called Nestor Makhno. He became a clever military tactician who helped liberate large areas of the country and attempted to put into practice more democratic ways of organising the economy. It was an intriguing experiment that was eventually crushed by the Bolsheviks.

There are books, articles, documentaries and even a multi-part Ukrainian-language TV series about Makhno. He isn’t forgotten in his homeland, though sometimes his politics are hijacked and misrepresented. Now there is another way to access information about him. Prolific French novelist Phillipe Thirault and Italian cartoonist Roberto Zaghi have collaborated on a graphic novel that offers a fictionalised account of Makhno’s life. It is now available in English.

Like anything there are plusses and minuses to this publication. Firstly, if you look at the pictorial elements of this graphic novel, there are some nicely rendered elements. The palette adopted is mostly a range of muted browns, greys and blues, the latter being particularly effective at showing night time scenes. It all fits the rural landscape that most of the action takes place in. There are bits of red used for uniforms or blood during fighting episodes, but they are also low key. The combined effect of all this is to give the whole thing a serious and realistic look.

An appendix shows that there was an honest attempt to make the Makhno character look like the real guy. His representation is based on actual photos of him. In addition there is an impressive effort to make each person shown, a distinctive individual, even for nameless peasants who appear in only a single frame. There is something appropriately democratic in that. On the other hand, it has to be said that Makhno and his closest allies, are given a smooth airbrushed treatment. This sometimes makes them look more like Parisian fashion models than the rugged and rough types they were. It does therefore tend to hollow out the more democratic impulses but perhaps is excusable? We are being given a fictionalised version rather than strict accuracy, so why not make them nice to look at?

Another aspect of the visuals that is largely successful is the way the panels propel the narrative. A page near the start shows Makhno in exile in France in the 1930s’. At the end of the page is a panel showing a close up of a nail being struck into the sole of a shoe, with an accompanying “Tchock!” sound. A panel inserted into a wider one at the top of the next page repeats the sound and has a close up of a nail being hit into a coffin. The action then pulls back and a caption tells us we are now in Makhno’s home village with him as a child at the grave site. The economy of this flashback is reminiscent of the editing you find in the work of famous Director David Lean, in films such as Dr Zhivago and Lawrence of Arabia. Elsewhere the use of sequences showing mid shot to close up then extreme close up and the use of multiple mini-panels inside a larger one, add to this sense of momentum. Its clever and probably the feature of the story that works best.

Other parts of the story fair less well. There is some clever jumping around in time using flashbacks and flashforwards. There is a backstory provided, explaining Makhno’s early life. It sounds very much like a version of Dicken’s Great Expectations or something out of an Leftist-version of an Horatio Alger or O. Henry short story. Many contemporary readers will consider this melodrama cloying. Anyone of a romantic bent who is less interested in the political angle, might find this aspect rewarding. As an effort to explain the psychological origins of Makhno’s class hatred this is less satisfying.

His political stance is something the dialogue often fails to explore adequately. That is due to it also often being expressed in a romantic vein. His character and other key participants make improbably grandiose statements such as “If I died, a thousand cherry trees would rise in my native land” (p. 72) spoken during a knife fight! Perhaps he did speak like that at times, but there are just too many similarly flowery speeches inserted at improbable moments, to make things seem credible. It mostly comes across as clunky rather than charismatic. Perhaps it can be justified. That is, if the target audience is the uninitiated reader who wants an exciting adventure or action story and isn’t too fussy about realism.

Nestor Makhno was an Anarchist. You would struggle to read this book and get a detailed or sophisticated idea of what that entailed. You won’t get much information on the economic arrangements the movement named for him actually put into place. The military actions carried out by the Makhnovists are given priority. The economic and social ideas they were fighting for are pushed into the background. Possibly this is done because it is more exciting than if there were pages of peasants collectively farming and discussing how to equitably divide the beetroot crop. There are hints of it here and there but not really enough. Perhaps its unfair to expect more from this format or from something of limited length.

Before concluding, a quick comment about Makhno’s attitude towards women as depicted here. On a positive note, some of the female characters in the text are given a prominence that many of the better-known books about Makhno don’t give them. This includes female guerilla leaders such as Fania Askarovna. There were also anonymous peasant women who grabbed the initiative at key moments in the struggle. Having said that, Makhno had a rough and misogynistic attitude to women at times and the narrative doesn’t shy away from that. It shows the complexities of his character and movement. Its also worth remembering that depiction is not necessarily full endorsement.

Historical figures can be discovered in a number of ways. We can find out about them to varying depths and with degrees of intricacy. For somebody who knows little about Nestor Makhno and his role in forging an alternative to authoritarianism, this graphic novel gives sporadic glimpses of what that was. Glimpses, but no more. It looks good visually, has a flare in its style and shows Makhno as a flawed but intriguing character with personal contradictions. However, in many ways it only gives a surface level understanding of the bigger picture. Is it worth getting? Yes. While lacking depth in some ways, it could be an easy entry approach to finding out about a fascinating movement. A movement that played an important part in Ukrainian and world history and still has something to tell us today.

Comments

Charles Hatfield (not verified) Sat, 08/13/2022 - 12:12

Surprised to see Makhno being called a misogynist here. I'm not saying he wasn't, or he was, just that I've never read anything about his attitude to women one way or the other.

Wayne Price (not verified) Sat, 08/13/2022 - 14:32

The review is positive about the work and about Nestor Makhno himself and his movement. However the charge that Makhno was misogynist is one of the various slanders used to attack him at the time and posthumously--along with charges of anti-Semitism, anti-working class, oppressor of Mennonite farmers, nationalism, and being a petty bourgeois bandit. All of which are false. We do not have to deny that Makhno was imperfect and not a saint to celebrate him as a great revolutionary anarchist.

BTW I wonder if the book (which I have not yet seen) covers his latter years when he co-authored the Draft Platform,, advocating anarchist democratic self-organization.

I am Makhno (not verified) Mon, 08/15/2022 - 11:14

You mean Leninist organization, don't you, Wayne Price? The Platform is one part of my namesake's legacy of which I am not proud.

Wayne Price (not verified) Mon, 08/15/2022 - 14:16

In reply to by I am Makhno (not verified)

Anarchist self-organization is different from Leninist vanguard parties in two key ways: (1) its aim is not to take power for itself through a revolution or getting elected. Its aim is to help the workers and their allies to organize themselves and make a revolution for themselves. It wants to oppose and expose the Marxist-Leninists, social democrats, liberals, etc. who will try to take over a popular movement.

(2) Its internal structure is that of a voluntary democratic federation, not of any kind of "centralism" ("democratic" or otherwise).

I am Makhno (not verified) Mon, 08/15/2022 - 19:21

In reply to by Wayne Price (not verified)

Yeah, well, I challenge anyone, including Wayne Price, to provide evidence from the text of the Platform itself that it is anything but Leninism with a thin veneer of anarchist rhetoric:

"In order to coordinate the activity of all of the Union's affiliated organizations, a special body is to be established in the form of an Executive Committee of the Union. The following functions will be ascribed to that Committee: implementation of decisions made by the Union, as entrusted; overseeing the activity and theoretical development of the individual organizations, in keeping with the overall theoretical and tactical line of the Union; monitoring the general state of the movement; maintaining functional organizational ties between all the member organizations of the Union, as well as with other organizations."

https://libcom.org/library/platform-5

anon (not verified) Mon, 08/15/2022 - 20:08

In reply to by I am Makhno (not verified)

Leninism, as Wayne correctly pointed out, incorporates an internal policy of democratic centralism. Clearly the Platform is not Leninist because their centralism doesn't even pretend to be democratic -- it's just hierarchical centralism. From an authentically anarchist perspective, it's hard to decide which is worse in practice, but I'll happily go out on a limb and say that the Platform, and all the neo-Platformist fans who've invoked "ideological and tactical unity" are a bunch of charlatans. There's nothing remotely anti-authoritarian about that paragraph or about much of the rest of the Platform. There are very good reasons why virtually every anarchist who had the misfortune to read the original Platform in 1926 denounced it as authoritarian nonsense.

AsceticWanker(… (not verified) Tue, 08/16/2022 - 01:58

In reply to by anon (not verified)

But thank Dawg these flat-headed platformists and the neo ones never came any close to the power Leninists have attained a 100 years ago in Russia, being just too lame and flimsy to grasp the power they're after.

Tho it's good to learn that in contemporary France they're achieving the same shit levels of empowerment due to being actually the same crowd than these Leninist Appelistas... as they yet did not have the Schism R&Bs had with MLMs a few decades back in NA.

Wayne Price (not verified) Tue, 08/16/2022 - 13:14

In reply to by I am Makhno (not verified)

The document was titled the "Draft Platform," for a good reason. It was not a final statement and was meant to be worked on. It had passages, such as the one quoted by I Am Makhno which may be interpreted in an authoritarian way and other passages which are much more libertarian, federal, and radically democratic. I do not know of anyone today who regards themselves as strict Platformists; rather they take the basic ("dual-organizationalist") concept as their central perspective.

It should be contrasted not only to Leninist vanguard parties but also to its anarchist alternative of disorganized, local-collectives-only, loose networks and self-determined zines, and individual actions unconnected to popular struggles.

anon (not verified) Tue, 08/16/2022 - 14:16

In reply to by Wayne Price (not verified)

None of the things Wayne deigns to identify as anarchist are disorganized. They may not be federated, and they may be obnoxiously self-referential, but they are hardly disorganized. And if "popular struggles" are dominated by nationalists, small capitalists, leninists, and/or other kinds of authoritarian pro-state and pro-police creeps, that's plenty reason for anarchists -- organized, federated, isolated, whatever -- to remain aloof instead of acting like beggars at the banquet. Begging to be taken seriously as an organized force capable of mobilizing masses is what "dual organizationalists" have been trying to do for as long as any of their parodic projects of dual power and especifismo have existed. And what a track record! They've all accomplished way more than any loose network ever could! I just wish I could remember what they have to show in terms of staying power and influence. Oh that's right! They don't have any. Oh well, just one more hyperorganizationalist cadre-based formal membership outfit and the anarchists will finally triumph!

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
(
h
p
e
a
g
w
t
Enter the code without spaces.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.